TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #146 · 16 сеп.

Функция sub в regex может принимать функцию в качестве аргумента repl. 📄 Из документации: If repl is a function, it is called for every non-overlapping occurrence of pattern. The function takes a single match object argument, and returns the replacement string. То есть для каждого совпадения будет вызвана функция для вычисления замены вместо замены на одну и ту же строку для всех совпадений. Иными словами, для замены разных совпадений на разные строки не потребуется запускать re.sub() много раз для каждой строки замены. Достаточно определить функцию, которая вернёт строку для каждого из совпадений. Описание слишком запутанное🤔, давайте лучше рассмотрим на простом примере: Создаем карту замены. То есть какие строки на какие требуется менять. remap = { 'раз': '1', 'два': '2', 'три': '3', 'четыре': '4', 'пять': '5', } Пишем функцию поиска строки для замены. Единственным аргументом будет объект re.Match. Используя данные этого объекта мы вычисляем замену on-the-fly! def get_str(match: re.Match): word = match.group(1) return remap.get(word.lower()) or word Пример текста. text = '''Раз Два Три Четыре Пять Вместе будем мы считать Пять Четыре Три Два Раз Мы считать научим вас ''' Теперь запускаем re.sub и вместо строки замены (repl) подаём имя функции. (Данный паттерн ищет отдельные слова в тексте) >>> print(re.sub(r'(\w+)', get_str, text)) 1 2 3 4 5 Вместе будем мы считать 5 4 3 2 1 Мы считать научим вас Думаю, достаточно наглядно 🤓 #libs#regex

Hashtags

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #shootings

当前筛选 #shootings清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #4966 · 26.01.2026 г., 16:59

How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Hours after federal agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse and American citizen, the Trump administration was already spinning the story: Pretti, they claimed, was a “domestic terrorist” out to “massacre law enforcement.” But video evidence tells a different tale—Pretti was seen stepping between a woman and an agent, pepper-sprayed, then pinned down before agents opened fire, killing him in a barrage of at least ten shots. The rush to blame Pretti and exonerate the agents wasn’t just premature—it flew in the face of standard law enforcement protocol. Officials at DHS and the White House coordinated their response, crafting statements before all facts were in, and some details were even removed from the official narrative as they struggled to reconcile it with what the videos showed. “The facts are going to come to light as to what exactly happened,” insisted Border Patrol chief Gregory Bovino, when pressed for evidence. The administration’s narrative—that Pretti “approached” officers with a handgun and “violently resisted”—was directly contradicted by bystander footage. Pretti’s gun was recovered only after he was already subdued, and he never drew it. Yet, DHS and Trump allies, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, labeled him a “domestic terrorist” and claimed to know his motive: “to inflict maximum damage.” Democrats, Republicans, and even gun rights groups expressed outrage. Senator Bill Cassidy called for a “full joint federal and state investigation,” warning, “The credibility of ICE and DHS is at stake.” Polls show most voters believe ICE has “gone too far,” and even some administration officials began to backtrack, with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche admitting, “I do not know, and nobody else knows, either. That’s why we’re doing an investigation.” So who’s really on trial here—the victim, the agents, or the narrative itself? #Minneapolis#Trump#ICE#shootings#narrative#investigation 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸