TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #309 · 2 фев.

Метод строки split() разделяет строку на несколько строк по указанному символу >>> "a_b_c".split('_') ['a', 'b', 'c'] Можно указать максимальное количество разделений >>> "a_b_c".split('_', 1) ['a', 'b_c'] Или резать с другой стороны с помощью rsplit() (right split) >>> "a_b_c".rsplit('_', 1) ['a_b', 'c'] А что будет если оставить аргументы пустыми? >>> "a_b_c".split() ['a_b_c'] Получаем список с одним элементом, потому что по умолчанию используется пробельный символ. >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] То есть это равнозначно такому вызову? >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', 'b', 'c'] Кажется да, но нет! Давайте попробуем добавить пробелов между буквами >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', '', '', 'b', '', '', 'c'] И вот картина уже не так предсказуема 😕 А вот что будет по умолчанию >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Всё снова красиво! 🤩 По умолчанию в качестве разделителя используется любой пробельный символ, будь то табуляция или новая строка. Включая несколько таких символов идущих подряд. А также игнорируются пробельные символы по краям строки. >>> "a\t b\n c ".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Аналогичный способ можно собрать с помощью регулярного выражения. Но пробелы по краям строки придется обрабатывать дополнительно. >>> import re >>> re.split(r"\s+", ' a b c '.strip()) ['a', 'b', 'c'] Здесь тоже можно указать количество разделений >>> re.split(r"\s+", 'a b c', 1) ['a', 'b c'] А что если мы хотим написать красиво, то есть split() без аргументов, но при этом указать количество разделений? В этом случае первым аргументом передаём None >>> "a\n b c".split(None, 1) ['a', 'b c'] Данный метод не учитывает строки с пробелами, взятые в кавычки 'a "b c" '.split() ['a', '"b', 'c"'] Но для таких случаев есть другие способы. #tricks#basic

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #mediterraneansecurity

当前筛选 #mediterraneansecurity清除筛选
Red Nile

@rednile12 · Post #10450 · 22.12.2025 г., 19:24

🔺Continuation from above @rednile12 ⚔️ Turkey: Strategic Catalyst While Greek officials publicly deny targeting Turkey, the logic is clear: ▪️Turkish Blue Homeland doctrine ▪️Naval assertiveness near Cyprus and drilling disputes ▪️40,000–60,000 troops in northern Cyprus ▪️Expansion in Syria The Xenophon concept is deterrence by coordination, raising the cost of Turkish escalation while avoiding overt provocation. Turkish responses online and politically reveal strategic irritation rather than indifference. 🛢️ EastMed & the U.S. Energy Play The security and energy dimensions are inseparable. EastMed — signed in Athens in January 2020 — was designed to link Israeli and Cypriot gas directly to Greece and onward to Europe, bypassing unstable intermediaries and reducing Europe’s exposure to Russian energy coercion. Consider the broader context: 🔹Nord Stream sabotage and closure of the Ukrainian transit corridor left Russia’s gas flowing via TurkStream, allowing Ankara to profit while Europe remained dependent. 🔹 U.S. President Trump explicitly pushed the EU to stop importing Russian gas while sabotaging Nord Stream, aiming to reroute Europe toward alternative suppliers. 🔹Analysts note the difference between Biden and Trump is one of style, not strategic logic — both administrations favored managing intermediaries over creating truly sovereign connectivity. 🔹 Other attempts, like IMEC linking India, the Gulf, and Europe, reveal the limits of Washington’s approach: symbolic agreements without Mediterranean anchors cannot secure reliable energy corridors, leaving Turkish leverage intact. 🇪🇬 Egypt: Bridge and Buffer Israel’s growing gas cooperation with Egypt complements EastMed rather than undermining it: ▪️ Egypt provides an immediate, pragmatic export route via existing LNG terminals ▪️ EastMed remains the long-term, direct corridor to Europe Together, they offer flexibility without reducing sovereignty. But Egypt’s role is also constrained: it is increasingly a logistics node in an Israel-centric Mediterranean security and energy order, limiting its diplomatic maneuvering, especially regarding Gaza. 🇵🇸 Palestine: Sidelined Palestine remains absent from regional security and energy calculus. Gaza is treated as a permanent security zone, not a political partner, while Israel embeds itself into Mediterranean and European security networks. Arab leverage erodes, and Palestine is reduced from a regional cause to a managed file. 🔻 Strategic Takeaways 🔹Xenophon Force: Multinational rapid response, signaling pro-Western deterrence, complicating Turkish ambitions. 🔹Energy Security: EastMed + Egypt LNG = sovereign flexibility for Europe, bypassing unstable intermediaries. 🔹U.S. Influence: Preference for managing intermediaries (Turkey, Ukraine, Central Asia) over eliminating dependency, risking strategic incoherence. 🔹Regional Impacts: Egypt partially integrated, Palestine structurally marginalized, Turkey forced to recalibrate. This is not peace architecture. It is conflict management for the strong — and structural invisibility for the weak. 🔴Follow @rednile12 for critical geopolitical analysis #RedNile_Geopolitics #EasternMediterranean#XenophonForce#IsraelGreeceCyprus#Turkey#Egypt#Palestine#EastMedPipeline#EnergyGeopolitics#BlueHomeland#NordStream#USEnergyStrategy#MediterraneanSecurity#RedNileMedia