TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← () => "翠楼屋"

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

查找相似内容

Source channel @lambdaexpression · Post #206 · 4月20日

前段时间一直被MajdataPlay的外键输入问题困扰:有玩家反映majplay会无征兆地出现拖判和吃音,但是内屏一切正常 因为我是第一次接触游戏开发,IO这方面也完全没经验 一开始我和bb本怀疑是线程调度的问题,即:IO线程时间片被其他线程挤占了,导致IO线程无法及时处理HID设备回报。为了验证这个猜想,我们尝试提高了IO线程的优先级,照旧 接下来我怀疑是我那套框架有问题:majplay是根据上一帧与这一帧的按键状态判断按键是不是"click"。为此我重写了这部分的实现,改进了IO线程与主线程之间的交互,问题照旧....... 到这里我已经怀疑这不是majplay的锅:IO线程没有任何异常,IO线程与主线程的交互没有问题,Note判定逻辑也没有问题,那就是设备确实没有回报给majplay或者设备发过来的回报中按键确实没有按下,但是大佬说hdd没有这种问题.....(人已经快崩溃了,这完全看不透也摸不着,因为我用单片机模拟玩家打高速纵连是完全没有问题的,我在家里用手台测试也没有问题) 到最后,bb本灵光一闪,说有没有可能是led刷新率过高,把按键控制板干爆炸了?我们让大佬把led刷新间隔从16ms改成100ms,吃音问题瞬间没有了,无语了 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 adx是一个控制板同时管理按键和led,为什么我没有遇到吃音问题呢,因为我的手台不是adx的... #dev

Hashtags

Results

找到 2 条相似帖子

搜索 #deterrence

当前筛选 #deterrence清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5576 · 2026/04/05 23:59

📰 The Fire Has a Chain of Command Iran’s retaliation is not random, and that is the bad news for everyone pretending this is just a chaos machine with missiles. Ynet reports that Tehran is now targeting parallel sectors — energy for energy, nuclear for nuclear, universities for universities — instead of merely answering one strike with one strike. That is not rage. That is calibration. Danny Citrinowicz said the fire “isn't random” and argued the pattern shows command and control is still intact; in other words, Tehran is not emptying the magazine, it is choosing the rooms. The ugly part is that the target list keeps widening. Haifa follows South Pars, Dimona follows Natanz, Ras Laffan follows the Gulf strikes, and now even universities are being floated as legitimate targets. So the “eye for an eye” slogan has already become a business plan for escalation. Everyone keeps speaking the language of deterrence while the region is being taught, sector by sector, what retaliation looks like when both sides insist on calling it strategy. #Iran#Israel#war#deterrence#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5062 · 2026/02/05 20:02

📰 The Nuclear Arms Control Era Is Over — and Everyone Is Going to Arms The last nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia is dead. On Thursday, New START expired, and for the first time since 1972, the two superpowers are left with no formal limits on the size or structure of their arsenals — just as both are racing to build new nuclear weapons and delivery systems that even the drafters of the original deals never imagined. The era of “managed doom” is over. The era of open‑ended arms racing has begun. Donald Trump has framed the expiration as a feature, not a bug. When asked in January why he hadn’t accepted Vladimir Putin’s offer of a one‑year informal extension, he shrugged: “If it expires, it expires,” he told The New York Times. He insisted a “better agreement” could be negotiated later — one that includes China and “other parties.” Beijing has already made clear it is not interested. The result is a triangular nuclear race where the U.S., Russia, and China are all expanding their arsenals, while the old treaties that once constrained them lie in the dust. The U.S. is preparing to deploy more nuclear warheads on its largest submarines, and to build up a new generation of nuclear‑capable cruise missiles and hypersonic platforms modeled after Russian and Chinese designs. Russia is experimenting with undersea and space‑based nuclear weapons and openly floating the idea of battlefield use; China is abandoning its old “minimum deterrent” posture and moving toward an arsenal that could rival Washington and Moscow. While the U.S. and Russia have cut their stockpiles from Cold War peaks, other countries are doing the opposite — Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Poland, and others are quietly asking whether they can still rely on the American “nuclear umbrella” — or whether they need their own warheads. Trump’s National Security Strategy barely mentions this shift. The only real acknowledgment appears in the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, which documents Beijing’s 600‑plus warheads, on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030. The strategy also sidesteps another danger: Putin’s repeated, barely veiled threats to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The White House seems to be betting that deterrence will hold, even as the world returns to the logic of the 1950s and 1960s — when every serious politician was expected to understand the nuclear balance. Back then, nuclear weapons dominated presidential debates, front‑page headlines, and pop‑culture nightmares. Today, nuclear danger is everywhere but rarely debated. The question is no longer whether the U.S. can “eliminate nuclear weapons,” as Barack Obama promised in Prague. It is whether Washington can prevent the next arms race from spinning out of control — and whether the rest of the world is ready to join the game. #nuclear#NewSTART#Russia#China#US#Trump#Putin#Xi#armsrace#deterrence#NYTimes 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸