DN42 access
本服务为那些无法轻松访问自身网络的用户以及希望体验 dn42 但又不想承担维护自有网络成本的用户提供 dn42 连接
默认情况下,地址从/96地址块中分配,如果您希望租用独立的/96前缀或更大的地址空间,请按照联系方式联系我
所有公开的PoP均已屏蔽来自中国境内的 IP 地址。如果您确实需要dn42 access,请与我联系并提供合理的理由
该服务由AS4242423377提供
- - - - - - -
The service provides DN42 connectivity to members who cannot easily access their own networks, as well as to those who would like to explore DN42 without the overhead of maintaining their own network.
By default, addresses are allocated from a /96 block. If you wish to lease a dedicated /96 prefix or a larger address space, please contact me using the methods provided in the contact information.
All publicly accessible PoP are blocked for IPs originating from within China. DN42 access from within China is not publicly available. If you genuinely require access, please contact me and provide a valid justification.
Hosted by AS4242423377.
Policy
本服务需要花费时间和金钱才能运行,但为了您的利益,我们免费提供。使用本服务是一种特权,而非权利。您必须合理使用本服务,以确保其他用户也能继续享受同样的便利。任何滥用、误用或干扰服务或其他用户的行为都可能导致您的访问权限立即被暂停或终止。
滥用行为包括但不限于:
- 过度使用资源
- 黑客攻击、病毒、木马等,或任何其他可能损害服务或对服务及其用户造成风险的干扰行为
- 传播可能导致民事或刑事责任的不良内容
- - - - - - -
This service require real time and financial resources to operate, yet are provided free of charge for your benefit. Access to the services is a privilege, not a right. You must use the services responsibly and considerately to ensure that other users can continue to enjoy the same opportunities. Any misuse, abuse, or activities that disrupt the service or other users may result in immediate suspension or termination of access.
Abuse could include, but is not limited to:
- Excessive use of resources
- Hacking, viruses, trojans etc or any other disruption that could harm or create risk to the services or its users
- Distribution of objectional content that could create a civil or criminal liability
PoP
## Toronto, Canada
Prefix: fdb6:fc6a:e66c:724f:fad1:d2cf::/96
Zerotier: 4753cf475f65b0fb
## Los Angeles, USA
coming soon
#announcement#service
📰 The Fire Has a Chain of Command
Iran’s retaliation is not random, and that is the bad news for everyone pretending this is just a chaos machine with missiles. Ynet reports that Tehran is now targeting parallel sectors — energy for energy, nuclear for nuclear, universities for universities — instead of merely answering one strike with one strike.
That is not rage. That is calibration. Danny Citrinowicz said the fire “isn't random” and argued the pattern shows command and control is still intact; in other words, Tehran is not emptying the magazine, it is choosing the rooms.
The ugly part is that the target list keeps widening. Haifa follows South Pars, Dimona follows Natanz, Ras Laffan follows the Gulf strikes, and now even universities are being floated as legitimate targets.
So the “eye for an eye” slogan has already become a business plan for escalation. Everyone keeps speaking the language of deterrence while the region is being taught, sector by sector, what retaliation looks like when both sides insist on calling it strategy.
#Iran#Israel#war#deterrence#MiddleEast
📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events
🇺🇸
📰 The Nuclear Arms Control Era Is Over — and Everyone Is Going to Arms
The last nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia is dead. On Thursday, New START expired, and for the first time since 1972, the two superpowers are left with no formal limits on the size or structure of their arsenals — just as both are racing to build new nuclear weapons and delivery systems that even the drafters of the original deals never imagined. The era of “managed doom” is over. The era of open‑ended arms racing has begun.
Donald Trump has framed the expiration as a feature, not a bug. When asked in January why he hadn’t accepted Vladimir Putin’s offer of a one‑year informal extension, he shrugged:
“If it expires, it expires,”
he told The New York Times. He insisted a “better agreement” could be negotiated later — one that includes China and “other parties.” Beijing has already made clear it is not interested. The result is a triangular nuclear race where the U.S., Russia, and China are all expanding their arsenals, while the old treaties that once constrained them lie in the dust.
The U.S. is preparing to deploy more nuclear warheads on its largest submarines, and to build up a new generation of nuclear‑capable cruise missiles and hypersonic platforms modeled after Russian and Chinese designs. Russia is experimenting with undersea and space‑based nuclear weapons and openly floating the idea of battlefield use; China is abandoning its old “minimum deterrent” posture and moving toward an arsenal that could rival Washington and Moscow. While the U.S. and Russia have cut their stockpiles from Cold War peaks, other countries are doing the opposite — Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Poland, and others are quietly asking whether they can still rely on the American “nuclear umbrella” — or whether they need their own warheads.
Trump’s National Security Strategy barely mentions this shift. The only real acknowledgment appears in the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, which documents Beijing’s 600‑plus warheads, on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030. The strategy also sidesteps another danger: Putin’s repeated, barely veiled threats to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The White House seems to be betting that deterrence will hold, even as the world returns to the logic of the 1950s and 1960s — when every serious politician was expected to understand the nuclear balance.
Back then, nuclear weapons dominated presidential debates, front‑page headlines, and pop‑culture nightmares. Today, nuclear danger is everywhere but rarely debated. The question is no longer whether the U.S. can “eliminate nuclear weapons,” as Barack Obama promised in Prague. It is whether Washington can prevent the next arms race from spinning out of control — and whether the rest of the world is ready to join the game.
#nuclear#NewSTART#Russia#China#US#Trump#Putin#Xi#armsrace#deterrence#NYTimes
📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events
🇺🇸