mindvomit

any time any commercial product does poorly in reviews, joomers come crawling out of sodom to accuse (sometimes implicitly) the reviewers of being conspirators today's example: https://www.pcgamer.com/games/action/earth-defense-force-6-gets-review-bombed-on-steam-over-a-surprise-epic-account-requirement-when-we-should-all-be-bombing-giant-bugs-instead/ I disagree with his thinly veiled premise: the reviews are not invalid just for being negative, or harsh, or numerous. if a shitty and undisclosed requirement to sign in wrecks it for most people, then it wrecks it for most people. easy.

How to access Archive.org's Google+ communities archive? https://reddit.com/r/WaybackMachine/comments/em62y0/how_to_access_archiveorgs_google_communities/

stolen version

lol, via lament jr Only a dictator would want things looking clean and orderly

A friendly reminder: Neither of the two old farts would give a shit if you got shot, let alone spend his day following the news about your condition. Don’t spend the entire day online today and go do something that will make your life better because neither of those two will, regardless of which one of them eventually gets elected.

вы прикиньте, КАК ему повезло. 7-10 мм ближе и все, ггвп, черный экран. семь миллиметров нахуй решили исход ВСЕГО. это удача нереальных масштабов просто, это пизда

Still no official CUDA repo for Ubuntu 24.04.....