Post #5544

For seven years now, my lawyer and I have been asking the judges what exactly I am supposed to have said or done that forms the basis of their prosecution. "Where and how, exactly, did I incite to hatred?" It is still completely unclear to this day. Judge Mieke Butstraen (Court of Appeal) finally iresponded to this in the ruling. She only did so because she was obliged to do so due to the 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪 objection we raised in our written submissions. Judge Butstraen wrote: “It is not the case that it must be specified which concrete material acts the accused is precisely alleged to have committed.” Well, if even 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 isn’t required anymore, what is your 𝐫𝐔𝐥𝐄 𝐨𝐅 𝐥𝐀𝐰 still worth then? What does such a ruling even mean anymore? Absolutely nothing! The 30th of December, the Supreme Court will decide wether this ruling, that convicted me to a prison sentence, holds.