@forbid_403 · Post #232 · 22.12.2023 г., 13:24
Google 与美国政府就一垄断案达成和解协议,将支付 6.3 亿美元以补偿用户。 和解协议中,Google 承诺将简化用户直接从开发者处下载软件的能力。 reuters.com/~ #Google#US#Antitrust
Hashtags
TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS
Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #374 · 6.06
Много новых людей пришло, расскажу ещё историю из бытия фрилансером. Делали мы как-то с другом проект для одной большой конторы (в своей области самой крупной в городе, миллиардные обороты). И вот там на старте нужно было подписаться в техзадании. А техзадание это такая увесистая папка страниц на сто. И подписаться мне, как руководителю проекта, нужно было на каждой странице. Когда проект запустился, ядро мы собрали быстро. Полный план был что-то типа полгода, но в конечном итоге заняло полтора, потому что после сборки ядра мы практически непрерывно занимались правками и замечаниями. Каждый месяц мы приезжали к заказчику и показывали, что сделали. А нам составляли список из 10-20 новых пунктов. За доработки доплачивали, но в какой то момент стало понятно, что мы в некотором смысле работаем на аутсорсе, хотя подписывались на один конкретный проект. А оставались мы работать, потому что проект не был введён в эксплуатацию, и бросать его без запуска не хотелось. Заказчик в итоге не переставал заваливать правками, шли месяцы. Впоследствии директор компании сменился, новому проект был без надобности, он заплатил нам остаток, который должен был, и проект остался навечно похоронен. Как так вышло: огромное и очень подробное техзадание, но всё равно непрерывные правки и замечания? Я позже рефлексировал этот момент и пришёл к таким выводам: 1. Заказчик описал в техзадании конечную систему, которую хотел бы видеть. Нам была нарисована практически каждая кнопка будущей софтины: очень детально и подробно. При этом результат, который требовался заказчику, был описан только в общих чертах (ещё и менялся по ходу дела). ТРИЗ учит нас обращать внимание на результат, а не на способ его достижения. 2. Заказчик не был готов ничего менять со своей стороны. Представьте, я прихожу в спортзал к тренеру и говорю, что вот вам деньги, а я хочу мускулистое тело. Мне тренер предлагает программу занятий. Но я заявляю, что нет, мне некогда, у меня нет времени и возможности ходить. Вообще для меня слишком дорого будет перестроить процессы в своей жизни. Так что нет, никаких походов на занятия. Я же плачу деньги, в конце-концов. Давайте, заплачу ещё больше, если требуется. Дам тренеру больше времени. Так же и тут: в компании были не готовы перестраивать процессы, обновлять софт и железо, обучать персонал. Поэтому новую систему пытались интегрировать со старой, а в интерфейсе использовать не лучшие решения, а привычные. #dev#freelance
Hashtags
Търсене: #antitrust
@forbid_403 · Post #232 · 22.12.2023 г., 13:24
Google 与美国政府就一垄断案达成和解协议,将支付 6.3 亿美元以补偿用户。 和解协议中,Google 承诺将简化用户直接从开发者处下载软件的能力。 reuters.com/~ #Google#US#Antitrust
Hashtags
@perspectiveix · Post #1761 · 21.03.2019 г., 13:30
💰Google Hit With Another Antitrust Fine in Europe The European Commission announced yet another #antitrust fine against #Google today, imposing a €1.49 billion ($1.69b) penalty for unfairly shielding its AdSense advertising platform from competition. "Today the Commission has fined Google €1.49 billion for illegal misuse of its dominant position in the market for the brokering of online search adverts. Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anti-competitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites", commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in an official statement. The European Commission’s latest ruling against Google is by no means the first time that the EU’s watchdog has taken action against an American tech company. In fact, Google itself got a taste of EU antitrust regulation as recently as last year. In July 2018, the European Commission hit Google with a record-breaking €4.3 billion fine for allegations related to #Android after having fined the company €2.4 billion ($2.7b) for anticompetitive behavior related to Google Shopping in July 2017. As the following chart illustrates, other tech giants have felt the wrath of the European Commission as well. #Microsoft alone has been fined four times over the past two decades including three times for allegedly ignoring previous antitrust sanctions and for breaking promises made in an earlier antitrust settlement. The EU’s competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, has made U.S. tech companies a central focus, cracking down on anticompetitive behavior, tax avoidance and mishandling of user privacy. 🚀@PerspectiveIX via Statista.
@ai_and_law · Post #516 · 28.02.2025 г., 08:04
🇺🇸Chegg Takes Google to Court Over AI Overviews Chegg has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, claiming that AI-generated search summaries are siphoning traffic and revenue from its platform. The lawsuit, filed on February 24, marks the first known legal challenge by a single company against Google's AI Overviews. Chegg alleges that Google is leveraging its market dominance to pressure companies into having their content used for AI-generated results—without compensation. CEO Nathan Schultz argues that Google is “reaping the financial benefits of Chegg’s content without having to spend a dime.” Facing declining revenues, Chegg is now considering going private or seeking acquisition. This case could set a precedent for how AI-generated content interacts with copyright and competition law. #AI#Antitrust#Copyright#AIRegulation#Google
@ai_and_law · Post #722 · 12.12.2025 г., 08:04
🇪🇺EU Opens Antitrust Probe into Google’s AI Training Practices The European Commission has launched an antitrust investigation into whether Google is using web content and YouTube uploads to train its AI systems without appropriate compensation, opt-out mechanisms, or equal access for competitors. Regulators are examining Google’s AI Overviews, AI Mode, and the use of YouTube content, noting that creators are required to grant Google permission for AI training without remuneration, while AI rivals are simultaneously blocked from using YouTube data for their own models. According to the Commission, the probe will assess whether Google imposes unfair terms on publishers and creators or grants itself privileged access to content in a way that may constitute abuse of dominance under EU competition rules. Google rejects the allegations, arguing that the inquiry risks slowing innovation and stating that tools like Google-Extended and robots.txt give publishers control, though the Commission noted concerns about the practical effects of blocking Google crawlers. T #AI#Antitrust#CompetitionLaw#DataGovernance#AIRegulation
@ai_and_law · Post #240 · 14.02.2024 г., 08:04
US FTC Hosts Inaugural AI Policy Summit Greetings everyone! The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held its first public summit on AI policy on January 25, 2024, focusing on antitrust and consumer protection challenges posed by AI technology's rapid evolution. The event convened experts from academia, industry, and government to discuss competition and consumer protection considerations in AI. FTC leaders expressed concerns about anticompetitive practices and consumer protection risks stemming from the adoption of large language models and generative AI. The agency is exploring enhanced enforcement in the AI sector while developing its liability regime. FTC Chair Lina Khan highlighted worries about incumbent tech companies consolidating control of the AI sector through vertical integration, leveraging their influence over training data and infrastructure. The FTC also signaled intentions to address consumer protection issues related to harmful AI applications and privacy violations in training data collection. The FTC announced a Section 6(b) inquiry into recent AI investments and partnerships between developers and cloud service providers to study their competitive impact. The summit reflects the FTC's commitment to understanding and regulating AI's impact on competition and consumer welfare. #FTC#AIPolicySummit#Antitrust#ConsumerProtection
@CryptoM · Post #64920 · 10.04.2026 г., 09:33
🚀 Meta's Legal Challenges May Impact Long-Term Share Recovery Meta Platforms Inc. is facing legal challenges that could affect its long-term stock recovery. Wall Street Journal (Markets) posted on X that the company, known for its social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram, is dealing with various lawsuits that may influence investor sentiment and stock performance. These legal issues include antitrust cases and privacy concerns, which have been ongoing for some time. The company's shares have experienced fluctuations due to these legal battles, and analysts suggest that the outcomes could have significant implications for Meta's market position. While the company continues to innovate and expand its services, the legal environment remains a critical factor for investors to consider. Meta's leadership is focused on addressing these challenges while maintaining its growth trajectory. However, the uncertainty surrounding the legal proceedings could lead to volatility in the stock market. Investors are advised to keep a close watch on developments in these cases as they unfold. #Meta#LegalChallenges#StockRecovery#Antitrust#PrivacyConcerns#InvestorSentiment#MarketVolatility#WallStreetJournal#Facebook#Instagram#StockPerformance#InvestorWatch