TGTGInsightтелеграм анализLIVE / telegram public index
← Такты, стеки, два колеса

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Намери подобно съдържание

Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #381 · 13.06

Семь откровений для меня о нашем дорожном движении. На одометре уже более 1500 км. Конечно, по меркам тех, кто ездит на автомобиле на работу, это мало. Но я до сих пор считаю, что в качестве регулярного транспорта автомобиль подходит только для редких сценариев. Мои поездки это в основном КАД, ЗСД, область, передвижение между окраинными точками. В город стараюсь не соваться. Но иногда приходится. Что я заметил, чего раньше не знал или не замечал: 1. Люди не сильно заморачиваются относительно своего положения в полосе. Раньше я боялся, что моё пока не развитое чувство габаритов будет мешать мне ехать по центру полосы. Но очень многие едут не по центру, и им пофиг. 2. На сигнал обычно плевать. Ещё ни разу, услышав сигнал какого-то другого водителя, я не идентифицировал ни его источник, ни причину возникновения. «Просто какой-то нервный тип гудит» — вот так это ощущается. 3. Самое часто нарушаемое правило, кроме скоростного режима — знак 5.15.1 «Направления движения по полосам». Кажется, на него водители кладут самый большой болт, который возможно. Просто едут как им удобнее. 4. Очень опасных мудаков меньше, чем рассказывают, но они опаснее, чем кажется. Есть люди, полностью отбитые на голову. К сожалению, система допустила их к вождению (и вообще к нахождению на свободе, а не на лечении). Но их довольно мало, я за полгода встретил 2-3 случая критически опасных нарушений. 5. Поток по непонятной мне причине пропускает вклинивающихся мудаков. Бывает, когда водители "легально" вклиниваются в плотно стоящую колонну: например, при выезде на дорогу с прилегающей территории, при обозначенном разметкой сужении итд. Но часто удивительно большой процент водителей объезжает пробку по обочине или по полосам "только налево"/"только направо". Я не понимаю, зачем водители в основой стоящей колонне их пропускают перед собой. Это плохо и с личной точки зрения (ты сам не двигаешься вперёд, пока пропускаешь) и с общественной (поощрение мудаков). Я стараюсь в таких ситуациях максимально близко держаться к впереди идущему автомобилю и не пропускать. Но многие (прям многие!) притормаживают, давая мудиле проехать. Я не понимаю, почему. 6. Мест, где дороги спроектированы с очевидными ошибками, много, а сама ошибка становится видна после буквально одного проезда по заданному участку. Люди, которые отвечают за проектирование дорог, сами по ним не ездят, по крайней мере, будучи за рулём. 7. От припаркованного транспорта вреда для водителей не меньше, чем для пешеходов. Я думал, что водителям просто плевать на условных мам с колясками (хотя некоторые из этих мам — их жёны). Но улиц, на которых из-за припаркованных автомобилей не разъехаться самим водителям, поразительно много. Приходится подвергать опасности себя и свою машину, выполнять небезопасные маневры, которые порой не предусмотрены не только правилами, но и конструкцией автомобиля. Такого много не только во дворах, но и на внешних улицах, как на окраине, так и в центре. Тоже за пределами моего понимания. #life

Hashtags

Резултати

Намерени 4 подобни публикации

Търсене: #armscontrol

当前筛选 #armscontrol清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5145 · 15.02.2026 г., 21:59

📰Xi’s Inland Nuke Empire: China Builds, Treaties Burn While Washington and Moscow let the last big arms-control treaty die, China has been quietly thickening its own shadow on the map — not with speeches, but with concrete, vents and blast doors in misty Sichuan valleys. Sites like Pingtong and Zitong, built in Mao’s old “Third Front” as an inland nuclear refuge, are now being rebuilt as the engine room of Xi Jinping’s nuclear upgrade: double fences, new bunkers, dense piping for hazardous materials, a 360‑foot stack over what analysts say looks like a plutonium pit plant — the core factory for future warheads. From orbit, even Xi’s slogan above the gate is visible: “Stay true to the founding cause and always remember our mission.” The mission is not subtle. Pentagon estimates say China has pushed past 600 warheads and is on track for 1,000 by 2030, a stockpile still far smaller than America’s or Russia’s but now growing fast enough to reshape crisis math over Taiwan and beyond. Add in the vast laser ignition lab in Mianyang — perfect for tuning warhead designs without live tests — and what you get is a state racing to move from “minimum deterrent” to something closer to peer status, all while refusing to join any arms‑control talks that might cap the trajectory. US officials now publicly accuse Beijing of flirting with test‑ban violations at Lop Nur; Chinese state media calls it slander, and outside experts argue over the evidence in footnotes while the excavation continues. The real danger isn’t just the numbers. It’s opacity. No one outside Zhongnanhai knows whether these upgrades are aimed at a modestly larger, more survivable second‑strike force or a sprint toward something much bigger, and Beijing shows no interest in clarifying. That pushes Washington to plan for worst‑case scenarios, Moscow to hedge, and every medium power in Asia to watch the great‑power nuclear ladder shaking above their heads. Xi’s inland nuclear empire sends one clear message: China intends to be untouchable by US nuclear pressure in any future Taiwan war. Everything else — stability, arms control, guardrails — is someone else’s problem. #china#nuclear#usa#armsControl#taiwan#war 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

@RusEmbMalta Press Release On the Development of a Global Missile Defense System by the United States 🇷🇺 The Embassy of the Russian Federation underscores that the concept of a global missile defense system is fundamentally flawed and cannot ensure protection against a potential retaliatory strike by Russia’s strategic forces. Its creation is therefore not only ineffective but also strategically unsound. ️🔹 NATO bears direct responsibility for the dismantling of international legal mechanisms that once upheld strategic stability and predictability in global affairs. The persistent unwillingness of NATO member states to engage in constructive dialogue with Russia further exacerbates military–political tensions, undermining collective security. ❗ We recall that the United States unilaterally rejected cooperation under Russia’s 2010 initiative for a collective European missile defense system – an approach that could have fostered genuine partnership rather than confrontation. Equally untenable are the deceptive assurances of NATO leadership that the deployed missile defense infrastructure is not aimed against Russia’s nuclear potential. These claims directly contradict NATO’s own recent statements identifying Russian strategic forces as a primary target of the system. Such inconsistency reveals the real nature of this project. 🔹It is evident that the driving force behind the expansion of U.S. missile defense capabilities abroad is not global security, but rather the financial interests of the American military–industrial complex. 🔹 Russia reaffirms its commitment to strategic stability, predictability, and equitable security for all nations, and calls upon partners to return to serious dialogue rather than the pursuit of illusory and destabilizing military solutions. #MissileDefense #GlobalSecurity #StrategicStability #ArmsControl

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5076 · 07.02.2026 г., 19:04

📰 Trump calls for ‘modernized’ nuclear treaty after New START expires President Donald Trump has let the New START nuclear‑arms treaty with Russia lapse, confirming in a social‑media post that he will not extend the deal and instead wants experts to craft a new “modernized” agreement. New START, signed in 2010, placed the last major limits on the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, capping each side at 1,550 deployed strategic warheads and 700 deployed launchers. With its expiration on February 5, there is now no formal nuclear‑arms‑control pact between the world’s two largest nuclear powers for the first time in over half a century. The Trump doctrine: “New, improved, and modernized” Trump dismissed New START as “a badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated.” In his Truth Social post, he argued that the U.S. should instead design a new treaty that includes China, whose nuclear arsenal is growing rapidly, and better reflects the strategic realities of the 2020s. He did not say whether formal talks with Russia have already begun. The White House has refused to confirm reports that U.S. and Russian officials drafted a plan in Abu Dhabi to keep observing New START limits for at least six months while negotiating a successor deal. The Democratic and arms‑control backlash Democratic lawmakers and arms‑control advocates had urged the administration to at least keep observing the treaty’s limits while talks continued. Rep. John Garamendi of California said New START’s expiration had thrown the world into a “terrifying new era,” with no constraints on the nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia. “History has already shown us where that road leads,” he warned. The strange dance of deterrence and dialogue Even as the treaty lapsed, the U.S. and Russia quietly agreed to reestablish high‑level military‑to‑military contact, their first such channel in over four years. The communication line was restored after a meeting in Abu Dhabi between Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, head of U.S. European Command and NATO’s top general in Europe, and senior Russian and Ukrainian military officials. That hotline is meant to reduce the risk of miscalculation and escalation, at a time when Russia is again pounding Ukraine’s energy grid — despite Trump’s earlier public appeal to Putin to halt strikes on Kyiv and other cities. So now the world has a paradoxical arrangement: no formal nuclear‑arms‑control treaty, but a renewed hotline between the world’s two biggest nuclear powers, and a president who wants a “modernized” deal — once the world is already on the edge again. Because the real question is not whether Trump can design a better treaty. It’s whether he is ready to live in a world where the guards are gone and the bombs are bigger. #Trump2026#NewSTART#Nuclear#Russia#US#ArmsControl#Diplomacy#Ukraine 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Crypto M - Crypto News

@CryptoM · Post #65045 · 10.04.2026 г., 16:04

🚀 Brazil and U.S. Collaborate on Project MIT to Combat Organized Crime Brazil and the United States have initiated Project MIT, a collaborative effort aimed at combating organized crime. Bloomberg posted on X that the project focuses on tracking arms and drug shipments while facilitating real-time intelligence sharing across borders. This initiative marks a significant step in enhancing cooperation between the two nations to address transnational criminal activities. #Brazil#UnitedStates#ProjectMIT#OrganizedCrime#TransnationalCrime#IntelligenceSharing#LawEnforcement#DrugTrafficking#ArmsControl#InternationalCooperation