TGTGInsightтелеграм анализLIVE / telegram public index
← Такты, стеки, два колеса

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Намери подобно съдържание

Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #40 · 6.06

Некоторые области удивительным образом игнорируют прогресс в других областях. Для меня самым характерным примером являются, пожалуй, бортовые компьютеры автомобилей. Вчера я ехал на такси Комфорт+, это была вполне приличная и не старая Kia Optima. Водитель параллельно со своим телефоном включил встроенный навигатор, и он ожидаемо оказался очень плох. Мало того, что даже близко не адаптирован под Россию, с убогой не детализированной картой, так ещё и жутко тормозил: FPS анимаций в районе 1-2. Потом я вспомнил, как мы с друзьями в Москве брали в каршеринге Genesis G70 — Южно-Корейский автомобиль премиум-класса с ценой от 2.5 млн рублей. И там стоял адаптированный бортовой компьютер под управлением Android. Надо ли говорить, что скорость его работы была настолько необъяснимо отстойной, что даже самый дешманский ноунейм китайфон справился бы с задачей навигации лучше? Каждый раз, когда я вижу экран бортового компьютера автомобиля, я будто смотрю через маленькое окошко в прошлое 20-летней давности. И по скорости работы и по функциональным возможностям всё поразительно плохо. Можно оправдывать это якобы безопасностью (сторонний софт нельзя ставить, чтобы он не мог повлиять на движение автомобиля), но на деле эти цепи легко разделяются: двигатель и важные узлы в одном месте, а навигатор, информация с датчиков, климат-контроль — в другом, на другом процессоре с другой областью памяти. Автомобильная промышленность в целом довольно консервативна. Поэтому большинство серийных моделей выглядят одинаково скучно, о каких-то крутых новых функциональных фишках мы слышим раз в десятилетие, а какие-то изобретенные полвека назад вещи до сих пор есть далеко не в каждой модели (например, парктроники). Но иногда до абсурда доходит: в тачке за пару лямов компьютер хуже, чем китайский планшет за десятку. #gadgets#life

Резултати

Намерени 13 подобни публикации

Търсене: #myth

当前筛选 #myth清除筛选
Sayohatnoma: Bagajsiz!

@bagajsiz · Post #73 · 28.01.2025 г., 23:03

#myth Chetga chiqsang, ba’zi stereotiplar parchalanadi deydiku. Ha afsus koʻpchiligi haqiqat boʻlib chiqadi. Masalan, Uzbekistanni Pakistan deb oʻylash. Bu mif emas, men bilan bir necha marta boʻldi. Nafaqat studentlar, balki teacher koʻpchiligi bilmaydiyam bizni mavjudligimizni.

Hashtags

On dragons The dragon Smej Gorynytsch was terrorizing the region around Kiev during the 11th century. The hero Dobrynja vanquished the dragon ultimately. This story follows the same pattern as Zeus defeating Typhon or Perun destroying Veles. #dragon#myth @EuropeanTribalism

Hashtags

Doniyor Olimjonov English | IELTS

@doniyorieltss · Post #451 · 08.01.2023 г., 05:58

#StudentsQuestionsAnswered#myth Let's debunk one common myth surrounding the word count in IELTS Writing: writing more / fewer words than necessary will lower your score. In the past, there was a fixed penalty for writing fewer words than required, as per instructions. But IELTS abolished that as of 2018, and you will not lose marks for being under word. It is also evident that there is no such thing as an upper limit in IELTS Writing. However, there is still a debate over whether or not going way over the recommended number affects your score. Now, does writing 200-220 words for Task 2 universally mean you will lose marks? NO! It's not the number of words that would lower your score, it is what is associated with it: main ideas that lack development. Clearly, your main ideas need to be developed sufficiently, warranting relevant reason(s), explanation(s), and example(s). This means that you would need at least 5 sentences to write a decent body paragraph, which would probably contain 10-20 words each — if you do the math, you would need to write at least 250 words no matter what! This goes to show that if you were to actually write fewer words than required, your ideas would be left under-developed (Task Response: Band 5-6 as per the band descriptors), which means that it's not being underlength per se that would impact your score — it is its result that does so. However, it's also a matter of the task at hand — whether or not it calls for a lot of words. There are certain questions that you could fully respond to with only 250-270 words, while there are also some that require far more words than necessary, say 500 words. In this case, it is perfectly fine to produce what you might assume is an overly long essay, as slashing this word count could compromise your TR score — you would not be able to fully cover the topic. So think twice before you pounce on my 400-word long essays. There is also an issue of 'redundancy' — writing too many words than necessary language-wise — that ticks off many IELTS Instructors such as myself. I check dozens of essays every week only to find out that most of the words and sentences in them are simply unnecessary. In an attempt to impress the reader, students go out their way to use seemingly high-level words/phrases such as 'due to the fact that' instead of a simple 'because'. I completely disapprove of this practice and argue that efficiency and communication should be prioritized in any type of writing — you should treat your words as if you treat your money. Thus, especially at lower levels (Band 5-6), candidates are highly recommended to keep the word count hovering at 250-300 words. Finally, let me also shed some light on Task 1, which is the part of Writing that doesn't receive the level of attention it deserves. When summarizing a chart/diagram, it is important to understand that there are usually a lot of key features you need to highlight and report. If you want to pull off Task 1, you should cover all those key features fully and clearly (Task Achievement: Band 8). Missing even one of such features would set you up for failure: Task Achievement: Band 4. As such, you might want to care less about how many words you need to write and more about what actually matters. I, for one, never think about the number of words when writing something; I focus on the message — so should you! @ieltsulugbeks

12
ПредишнаСтр. 1 от 2Следваща