TGTGInsightтелеграм анализLIVE / telegram public index
← Такты, стеки, два колеса

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Намери подобно съдържание

Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #404 · 30.06

На днях предъявили обвинение разработчику, который создавал и продавал бота для игры в World of Tanks. Собираются его посадить на 1.5 года. Программист из Екатеринбурга Андрей Кирсанов несколько лет назад написал бота, который сканирует экран и сам двигает мышкой так, чтобы целиться вместо игрока и увеличивать шансы попадания в уязвимые части брони в игре World of Tanks. Компания Wargaming обратилась в МВД, произвели контрольную закупку и установили, что продаётся якобы вредоносный софт. Начался суд, прокуратура предлагает посадить. Сходу кажется, что бот для игры не подходит под определение вредоносного софта: он не внедряется в память другой программы, не ворует деньги, не взламывает никакие пароли. Судят по статье 273 УК РФ за создание программы для «несанкционированного уничтожения, блокирования, модификации, копирования компьютерной информации». Но в комментариях на Хабре справедливо заметили, что информация о пользовательском вводе — это тоже информация, а бот её подделывает. Причем, читеры наносят ущерб внутренней экономике игры, а, значит, создают косвенные убытки для компании: игроки менее охотно захотят платить в игре, если в ней они постоянно проигрывают. В Корее, например, есть вполне официальная статья за читы. Они там помешаны на киберспорте, для них видеоигры это часть национальной идентичности, так что использование читов вполне серьёзно приравнивается к использованию допинга на крупных спортивных состязаниях, и может даже уголовно наказываться. То есть, вот непонятно. Вроде бы это всё игрушки и звучит смешно. А вроде бы всё сходится: подделка данных есть, экономический ущерб есть, да и вообще вред для большого количества людей. В 2022 странно было бы всерьёз считать игры какой-то несерьёзной детской забавой, не влияющей на рынок и взаимоотношения взрослых людей. #games

Hashtags

Резултати

Намерени 143 подобни публикации

Търсене: #harvard

当前筛选 #harvard清除筛选
PDF资料

@pdf_001 · Post #869 · 04.11.2020 г., 13:02

#Harvard Writing Project 提供的写作手册涵盖史学、文学、艺术史、人类学、哲学、宗教学、政治学、性别研究、经济学、心理学等。全部PDF,自由下载 https://writingproject.fas.harvard.edu/pages/disciplinary-writing-guides

Hashtags

🕵🏻‍♀️How Harvard rates your application? part 4 For part 1: https://t.me/farangizmurodiy/14 🏛 When you apply to Harvard, Harvard rates your application from 1 to 6 in four categories and gives one overall rating. Part 4: Athletic Rating 🏅🏅🏅 1️⃣Unusually strong prospect for varsity sports at Harvard, desired by Harvard coaches. 2️⃣ Strong secondary school contribution in one or more areas; possible leadership role(s). 3️⃣ Active participation. 4️⃣ Little or no interest. 5️⃣ Substantial activity outside of conventional EC participation such as family commitments or term-time work (could be included with other e/c to boost the rating or left as a "5" if it is more representative of the student's commitment). 6️⃣Physical condition prevents significant activity. Note: After watching lots of videos of Harvard students talking about their admission files, I understood that not being athlete will not damage your application, but if you're an international level athlete, it will benefit you a lot. Because the calculation of an application's overall rating is not just arithmetical, getting a low athletic rating will not disadvantage you if you are very successful in other areas. However, getting 1, being recruited athlete, will boost your application significantly. 👩🏻‍⚖️ This was the part 4 of#Harvard admission series. Finally, in the next Harvard post, I’ll be sharing strategies on how you can apply those valuable infos from all four parts to your own application. @farangizmurodiy

Hashtags

🕵🏻‍♀️How Harvard rates you? part 3 🏛 When you apply to Harvard, Harvard rates your application from 1 to 6 in four categories and gives one overall rating. Part 3: Personal Rating ❤️ 1) Outstanding 2) Very Strong 3) Generally Positive 4) Bland or somewhat negative or immature 5) Questionable personal qualities 6) Worrisome personal qualities 🤯 This is the most subjective rating in Harvard admissions. Also, this subjectiveness is the reason why Harvard is dealing with an affirmative action lawsuit. More info: https://rb.gy/tjr3zl What determines your personal rating is: 📝 Essays 👩‍🏫 Recommendation Letters Because it's very subjective, your application as a whole plays a role in this rating. Part 1: https://t.me/farangizmurodiy/14 Part 2:https://t.me/farangizmurodiy/23 👩🏻‍⚖️ This was the part 3 of 4 #Harvard admission series. In the end of the series, I’ll be sharing strategies on how you can apply this valuable info to your own application. @farangizmurodiy

Hashtags

🕵🏻‍♀️How Harvard rates you? part 2 🏛 When you apply to Harvard, Harvard rates your application from 1 to 6 in four categories and gives one overall rating. Part 2: Extracurricular Rating 🏆 1️⃣ Unusual strength in one or more areas. Possible national-level achievement or professional experience. A potential major contributor at Harvard. Truly unusual achievement. 2️⃣Strong secondary school contribution in one or more areas such as class president, newspaper editor, etc. Local or regional recognition; major accomplishment(s).[in another filing]: "Significant school, and possibly regional accomplishments: for example, an applicant who was the student body president or captain of the debate team and the leader of multiple additional clubs." 3️⃣Solid participation but without special distinction. (Upgrade 3+ to 2- in some cases if the e/c is particularly extensive and substantive.) 4️⃣ Little or no participation. 5️⃣Substantial activity outside of conventional EC participation such as family commitments or term-time work (could be included with other e/c to boost the rating or left as a "5" if it is more representative of the student's commitment). 6️⃣Special circumstances limit or prevent participation (e.g. a physical condition). 👩🏻‍⚖️ This was the part 2 of 4#Harvard admission series. In the end of the series, I’ll be sharing strategies on how you can apply this valuable info to your own application. @farangizmurodiy

Hashtags

🕵🏻‍♀️How Harvard rates you? When you apply to Harvard, Harvard rates your application from 1 to 6 in four categories and gives one overall rating. Part 1: Academic Achievement 📚 1) Summa potential: Genuine scholar; near-perfect scores and grades (in most cases) combined with unusual creativity and possible evidence of original scholarship. 2) Magna potential: Excellent student with superb grades and mid-to-high-700 scores (33+ ACT). 3) Cum laude potential: Very good student with excellent grades and mid-600 to low-700 scores (29 to 32 ACT). 4) Adequate preparation: Respectable grades and low-to-mid-600 scores (26 to 29) ACT). 5) Marginal potential: Modest grades and 500 scores (25 and below ACT). 6) Achievement or motivation marginal or worse. 👩🏻‍⚖️ This was the part 1 of 4 #Harvard admission series. In the end of the series, I’ll be sharing strategies on how you can apply this valuable info to your own application. 🏆 Follow for more unique admission strategies: @farangizmurodiy

Hashtags

123•••101112
ПредишнаСтр. 1 от 12Следваща