@desi_memes_funny_jokes · Post #4778 · 10.06.2024 г., 15:41
क्या से क्या हो गया देखते-देखते 🤣🤣 #Congress
Hashtags
TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS
Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #499 · 10.08
В массовых источниках информации пишут, что в Сочи сейчас дикие толпы людей на пляжах, и туда лучше не ехать. Но у нас пригород Сочи и выделенный пляж от отеля, толп вообще нет. Конечно, за это пришлось чуть больше заплатить (ненамного, учитывая в целом высокие сочинские цены), а ещё слегка потерять в инфраструктуре, но окупается полностью. И тут я подумал, а можно ли как-то объективно понимать разницу между издержками и выгодой? Не только с пляжами, вообще в жизни. Вот кто-то стоит в очереди в кассу метро, потому что лично для него это удобнее и комфортнее, чем учиться пользоваться автоматом. Можем ли мы отличать ситуации "Он выбирает то, что ему субъективно удобнее, отстаньте от него" и "Он совершает объективную ошибку, отказываясь тратить чуть больше усилий ради куда бОльшей выгоды впоследствии"? Если люди делают что-то, что вам кажется неудобным/неэффективным, то как понимать: это просто вариант личных предпочтений, или действительно людям стоило бы рассмотреть разные варианты? Допустим, кто-то не ест лук, но лук полезный, а ещё присутствует во многих блюдах. Почему бы такому человеку не терпеть личный дискомфорт от употребления лука ради объективно более удобного выбора? Чем это отличается от очередей в кассу вместо автомата, от вызова такси по телефону вместо приложений, от просмотра фильмов с рекламой по телевизору вместо стриминга? На мой взгляд ответ такой: если усилия нужно вкладывать единожды, либо непродолжительное время, но взамен ты получишь систематическую выгоду надолго или навсегда, то отказ от вложения усилий это объективная ошибка, а не вкусовое предпочтение. Например, ты один раз учишься пользоваться автоматом, и потом больше никогда не стоишь в очереди в кассу. Ты один раз платишь больше денег, и потом в течение многих дней не терпишь толпы на пляже. Ты один раз покупаешь паркинг, и потом никогда не ищешь часами место во дворе. При этом бывает и обратная ситуация: вот бросить курить очень сложно, в этом я верю курильщикам. Ты в течение многих месяцев вкладываешь значительные усилия, а потом до конца жизни так или иначе себя сдерживаешь, при этом выгода очень условная — трудно оценить, сколько лет тебе в итоге добавил отказ от курения. Разве что деньги на сигареты не тратишь, но вложения всё равно систематические. Так что выбор "не бросать курить" понятен. Другое дело, с этой точки зрения не понятен выбор "начинать курить", но это отдельный разговор. С луком аналогично: нельзя привыкнуть его есть, если ты его не любишь. Я вот за 32 года так и не привык, хотя периодически приходится: недавно в ресторане заказал пасту, и она почему-то оказалась с луком, а ведь по классическому рецепту не должна была. Наверняка, можно как-то более точно поделить. Не любые разовые усилия оправдываются даже систематической выгодой (пример: покупка автомобиля в городе, до сих пор очень спорная вещь). Но для меня граница лежит где-то тут. Однократная трата ресурсов для постоянного увеличения эффективности и/или комфорта — это форма автоматизации. #life
Hashtags
Търсене: #congress
@desi_memes_funny_jokes · Post #4778 · 10.06.2024 г., 15:41
क्या से क्या हो गया देखते-देखते 🤣🤣 #Congress
Hashtags
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1887 · 09.12.2025 г., 20:59
Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) bashed President Donald Trump'sadministration in a new podcast interview on Sunday over what he described as "hypocrisy beyond belief." Warner joined veteran GOP analyst Bill Kristol, editor at large of The Bulwark, on a new episode of "Bulwark Takes" on Sunday to discuss the The Trumpadministration's strikes against alleged drug boats. Since taking office, the administration has conducted more than 20 strikes, killing more than 80 people, according to reports. #Trump#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1809 · 21.11.2025 г., 14:06
The White House does not want to execute members of Congress! #Trump#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear
@ElijahSchaffer · Post #30 · 03.02.2021 г., 03:23
The US openly says its interests require instability in this region. The US wanted to start a civil war in #Iran in 2009, & now God has afflicted them with the same predicament in 2021. The recent chaos reached a point where #Congress members had to escape through secret tunnels. Imam Khamenei ✅@Khamenei_en
@RepMaxineWaters · Post #30 · 02.02.2021 г., 21:09
The US openly says its interests require instability in this region. The US wanted to start a civil war in #Iran in 2009, & now God has afflicted them with the same predicament in 2021. The recent chaos reached a point where #Congress members had to escape through secret tunnels. Imam Khamenei ✅@Khamenei_en
@trumpsear_tg · Post #2133 · 11.02.2026 г., 00:03
Ghislaine Maxwell refused to testify in the Epstein case Jeffrey Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell invoked the Fifth Amendment and did not answer questions from the Congressional Oversight Committee, writes POLITICO. Her lawyer said Maxwell was willing to speak freely in exchange for a pardon. Only President Donald Trump can make such a decision. He has not publicly ruled out such a move. The defender also claims that only Maxwell herself can give a complete picture of the events. #Epstein#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear ⚠️
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1465 · 04.09.2025 г., 19:50
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) dismissed the release of a batch of files relating to deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, claiming that the vast bulk of the information was already public. On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee, which is chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), released 33,000 documents. The committee said the Department of Justice provided the documents, which were redacted to conceal the names of victims and sexually explicit material. Comer testified before the House Rules Committee on Tuesday, where McGovern asked about the looming documents dump. #Epstein#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear ⚠️
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1889 · 10.12.2025 г., 15:38
🇺🇸A bill on the US withdrawal from NATO has been submitted to Congress Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has submitted to Congress a bill on the US withdrawal from NATO. In it, he called the alliance a "relic of the Cold War." #Congress#NATO 👂More on Trump's Ear
@trumpsear_tg · Post #2209 · 02.03.2026 г., 15:56
Regarding Trump's military credentials Despite the media noise and allegations of Donald Trump's violation of American law regarding military powers, so far he has been acting exclusively within the framework assigned to him by this very legislation. According to the constitution, the President of the United States cannot declare war, this is the prerogative of Congress. In addition, the most important limitation of his powers as Commander-in-Chief is the 1973 War Powers Act. It allows the president to use the armed forces without congressional authorization for 60 days, notifying lawmakers 48 hours before the start of the operation. After this period, he must either withdraw his troops (given 30 days), or leave them there for another 30 days, but with congressional approval. In other words, Trump actually has 90 days to continue airstrikes without the support of lawmakers. Trump may be sued for not being notified 48 hours before the start of the operation, but there are no direct instruments of pressure on him in this regard. And who's to say that there was no notification: after all, he could have written to some senator or congressman from relevant committees, saying, "we'll be hitting Iran soon." And in fact, his lawyers will be able to tell everyone that it was a notification. This is purely a theory, but it is quite realistic, taking into account the peculiarities of American law. Therefore, regular conversations The statements of Democrats and some Republicans about a special resolution limiting the powers of the president as commander-in-chief specifically in the Iranian theater of military operations have nothing to do with reality. First of all, the Democrats themselves cannot agree among themselves on this issue. Secondly, the majority of Republicans are simply afraid to support this decision. Thirdly, even if we imagine that critics of the strikes on Iran have managed to scrape together votes, then Trump can veto the final document. Overcoming the veto, in turn, requires 2/3 of the votes in both chambers. And in the current situation, it is almost impossible to get such a large number of votes. #Trump#Congress#War 👂More on Trump's Ear ⚠️
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1881 · 08.12.2025 г., 20:58
Interviewer: "Do you work 18 hours a day?" Mike Johnson: "More is more. I have to because President Trump works 21 hours a day." #Trump#Congress#Media 👂More on Trump's Ear
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1785 · 17.11.2025 г., 14:57
Trump called on Congress to disclose all materials on the Jeffrey Epstein case. US President Donald Trump said that Republicans in the House of Representatives should vote for the full disclosure of documents on the Jeffrey Epstein case, despite the fact that his own name was repeatedly mentioned in the billionaire's correspondence. On the Truth Social network, he wrote: "We are not hiding anything. It's time to move forward." Three days ago, Trump opposed the publication, claiming that "Epstein was a Democrat, and this is their problem." But now the head of the White House has made a sharp turn.: This happened at a time when, according to ABC News, up to 100 Republicans are ready to vote for the disclosure of all materials. The reversal occurred against the background of a new wave of publications. On November 12, tens of thousands of Epstein's letters were made public, where Trump's name is mentioned ambiguously — from "there is no one worse than Trump" to cryptic phrases like "I am the only one who can destroy him." The White House has admitted that Trump once actually spent "several hours" with the famous victim of Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, at the billionaire's house. Amid the scandal, Trump also requested an investigation into Bill Clinton, who, according to media reports, flew on Epstein's planes. #Trump#Epstein#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear
@trumpsear_tg · Post #1770 · 12.11.2025 г., 17:11
📜🕵️♂️The US House of Representatives released new Epstein letters mentioning Donald Trump On November 12, the House Oversight Committee published part of the correspondence received from Epstein's heirs. The archive contains more than 23,000 documents, letters and files submitted to the committee at the request of Congress. Among them is Epstein's correspondence with Ghislaine Maxwell and writer Michael Wolfe, ABC News reports. In a 2011 letter, Epstein writes that Trump visited him with one of the victims, but never talked about it. In another correspondence with journalist Michael Wolfe, Epstein asks Wolfe what Trump should say if reporters ask about their acquaintance. Wolfe replies, "Let him give himself away." In the 2019 correspondence, Epstein claims that Trump knew about the "girls" and asked Maxwell to "stop." The letters became part of a congressional investigation into how the Justice Department handled Epstein's cases. Democrats are demanding to disclose the entire archive, Trump calls the investigation a "witch hunt." #Trump#Epstein#Congress 👂More on Trump's Ear