TGTGInsightтелеграм анализLIVE / telegram public index
← Такты, стеки, два колеса

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Намери подобно съдържание

Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #702 · 15.12

Сайты "Комитета" (VC, DTF) обновили дизайн лайков и дизлайков. Раньше это была цифра с двумя стрелками-кнопками, как на Reddit, Хабре и Пикабу. Стрелка вверх добавляла посту или комментарию плюс, а стрелка вниз — минус. Сумма всех плюсов и минусов выводилась или зелёным, если она положительная, или красным с минусом, если отрицательная. Сейчас лайк сделали отдельной кнопкой слева, дизлайк — отдельной кнопкой справа, с другим дизайном. А счётчик показывает всем только лайки, а дизлайки только автору. Спорный тут и дизайн, и само решение. Дизайн понятно, почему: кнопки абсолютно разных стилей и в разных местах отвечают за принципиально похожие действия. Пользователи DTF уже вовсю стебутся комментами "Я скачал твой пост" (потому что кнопка дизлайка похожа на скачивание). Но куда хуже то, что дизлайки отображаются только автору. Они при таких условиях нафиг не нужны. Автор может просто игнорировать этот счётчик. Раньше, если какой-то человек сморозил чушь, толпа его массово минусует, и все это видят, и он сам знает, что все видят. С полным ртом минусов очень сложно как-то оправдываться и продолжать отстаивать свою точку зрения. Ещё и добавлялось удобство сканирования для читателей: комменты с минусами можно специально пропускать, или, допустим, специально останавливаться на них ради горячей дискуссии. У этой системы, разумеется, был серьёзный косяк: минусы получали не только те, кто говорил неверное или глупое мнение, но и те, кто говорил непопулярное мнение. Например, на VC лучше было не писать комментарии в поддержку России, даже если по смыслу тезис верный и просто передаёт какой-то факт, вроде "Россия одна из лучших в мире в области атомной энергетики". Это сводило обсуждения к тому, что люди либо молчали, либо подстраивались под принятую в сообществе идеологию, что могло, например, создавать ложные впечатления относительно количества поддерживающих ту или иную точку зрения, да и в целом не всегда способствовало образованию интересных обсуждений. Тем не менее, на мой взгляд, полное сокрытие дизлайков при наличии самой кнопки дизлайка — решение, которое берёт худшее от всех альтернатив. Сам по себе институт дизлайка остаётся (а, значит, остаётся выражение негатива), при этом с коллективной ответственности за негатив ("Мудаки меня травят, ну и фиг с ними, стадо баранов!") идёт перенос на личную ответственность за негатив ("Вася Иванов меня травит, найду козла и начищу ему харю!"). Причём, ещё и для пользователей от этого нет никакого толка: теперь кто угодно может писать что угодно, и в худшем случае публично получит за это ноль лайков и всё. Впрочем, в "Комитете" совершенно явный управленческий кризис (как и много где сейчас). Удивительно, что сайты хоть как-то ещё поддерживаются и даже вносятся изменения. #web

Hashtags

Резултати

Намерени 4 подобни публикации

Търсене: #armscontrol

当前筛选 #armscontrol清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5145 · 15.02.2026 г., 21:59

📰Xi’s Inland Nuke Empire: China Builds, Treaties Burn While Washington and Moscow let the last big arms-control treaty die, China has been quietly thickening its own shadow on the map — not with speeches, but with concrete, vents and blast doors in misty Sichuan valleys. Sites like Pingtong and Zitong, built in Mao’s old “Third Front” as an inland nuclear refuge, are now being rebuilt as the engine room of Xi Jinping’s nuclear upgrade: double fences, new bunkers, dense piping for hazardous materials, a 360‑foot stack over what analysts say looks like a plutonium pit plant — the core factory for future warheads. From orbit, even Xi’s slogan above the gate is visible: “Stay true to the founding cause and always remember our mission.” The mission is not subtle. Pentagon estimates say China has pushed past 600 warheads and is on track for 1,000 by 2030, a stockpile still far smaller than America’s or Russia’s but now growing fast enough to reshape crisis math over Taiwan and beyond. Add in the vast laser ignition lab in Mianyang — perfect for tuning warhead designs without live tests — and what you get is a state racing to move from “minimum deterrent” to something closer to peer status, all while refusing to join any arms‑control talks that might cap the trajectory. US officials now publicly accuse Beijing of flirting with test‑ban violations at Lop Nur; Chinese state media calls it slander, and outside experts argue over the evidence in footnotes while the excavation continues. The real danger isn’t just the numbers. It’s opacity. No one outside Zhongnanhai knows whether these upgrades are aimed at a modestly larger, more survivable second‑strike force or a sprint toward something much bigger, and Beijing shows no interest in clarifying. That pushes Washington to plan for worst‑case scenarios, Moscow to hedge, and every medium power in Asia to watch the great‑power nuclear ladder shaking above their heads. Xi’s inland nuclear empire sends one clear message: China intends to be untouchable by US nuclear pressure in any future Taiwan war. Everything else — stability, arms control, guardrails — is someone else’s problem. #china#nuclear#usa#armsControl#taiwan#war 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

@RusEmbMalta Press Release On the Development of a Global Missile Defense System by the United States 🇷🇺 The Embassy of the Russian Federation underscores that the concept of a global missile defense system is fundamentally flawed and cannot ensure protection against a potential retaliatory strike by Russia’s strategic forces. Its creation is therefore not only ineffective but also strategically unsound. ️🔹 NATO bears direct responsibility for the dismantling of international legal mechanisms that once upheld strategic stability and predictability in global affairs. The persistent unwillingness of NATO member states to engage in constructive dialogue with Russia further exacerbates military–political tensions, undermining collective security. ❗ We recall that the United States unilaterally rejected cooperation under Russia’s 2010 initiative for a collective European missile defense system – an approach that could have fostered genuine partnership rather than confrontation. Equally untenable are the deceptive assurances of NATO leadership that the deployed missile defense infrastructure is not aimed against Russia’s nuclear potential. These claims directly contradict NATO’s own recent statements identifying Russian strategic forces as a primary target of the system. Such inconsistency reveals the real nature of this project. 🔹It is evident that the driving force behind the expansion of U.S. missile defense capabilities abroad is not global security, but rather the financial interests of the American military–industrial complex. 🔹 Russia reaffirms its commitment to strategic stability, predictability, and equitable security for all nations, and calls upon partners to return to serious dialogue rather than the pursuit of illusory and destabilizing military solutions. #MissileDefense #GlobalSecurity #StrategicStability #ArmsControl

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5076 · 07.02.2026 г., 19:04

📰 Trump calls for ‘modernized’ nuclear treaty after New START expires President Donald Trump has let the New START nuclear‑arms treaty with Russia lapse, confirming in a social‑media post that he will not extend the deal and instead wants experts to craft a new “modernized” agreement. New START, signed in 2010, placed the last major limits on the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, capping each side at 1,550 deployed strategic warheads and 700 deployed launchers. With its expiration on February 5, there is now no formal nuclear‑arms‑control pact between the world’s two largest nuclear powers for the first time in over half a century. The Trump doctrine: “New, improved, and modernized” Trump dismissed New START as “a badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated.” In his Truth Social post, he argued that the U.S. should instead design a new treaty that includes China, whose nuclear arsenal is growing rapidly, and better reflects the strategic realities of the 2020s. He did not say whether formal talks with Russia have already begun. The White House has refused to confirm reports that U.S. and Russian officials drafted a plan in Abu Dhabi to keep observing New START limits for at least six months while negotiating a successor deal. The Democratic and arms‑control backlash Democratic lawmakers and arms‑control advocates had urged the administration to at least keep observing the treaty’s limits while talks continued. Rep. John Garamendi of California said New START’s expiration had thrown the world into a “terrifying new era,” with no constraints on the nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia. “History has already shown us where that road leads,” he warned. The strange dance of deterrence and dialogue Even as the treaty lapsed, the U.S. and Russia quietly agreed to reestablish high‑level military‑to‑military contact, their first such channel in over four years. The communication line was restored after a meeting in Abu Dhabi between Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, head of U.S. European Command and NATO’s top general in Europe, and senior Russian and Ukrainian military officials. That hotline is meant to reduce the risk of miscalculation and escalation, at a time when Russia is again pounding Ukraine’s energy grid — despite Trump’s earlier public appeal to Putin to halt strikes on Kyiv and other cities. So now the world has a paradoxical arrangement: no formal nuclear‑arms‑control treaty, but a renewed hotline between the world’s two biggest nuclear powers, and a president who wants a “modernized” deal — once the world is already on the edge again. Because the real question is not whether Trump can design a better treaty. It’s whether he is ready to live in a world where the guards are gone and the bombs are bigger. #Trump2026#NewSTART#Nuclear#Russia#US#ArmsControl#Diplomacy#Ukraine 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Crypto M - Crypto News

@CryptoM · Post #65045 · 10.04.2026 г., 16:04

🚀 Brazil and U.S. Collaborate on Project MIT to Combat Organized Crime Brazil and the United States have initiated Project MIT, a collaborative effort aimed at combating organized crime. Bloomberg posted on X that the project focuses on tracking arms and drug shipments while facilitating real-time intelligence sharing across borders. This initiative marks a significant step in enhancing cooperation between the two nations to address transnational criminal activities. #Brazil#UnitedStates#ProjectMIT#OrganizedCrime#TransnationalCrime#IntelligenceSharing#LawEnforcement#DrugTrafficking#ArmsControl#InternationalCooperation