TGTGInsightтелеграм анализLIVE / telegram public index
← Такты, стеки, два колеса

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Намери подобно съдържание

Изходен канал @clockstackwheels · Post #702 · 15.12

Сайты "Комитета" (VC, DTF) обновили дизайн лайков и дизлайков. Раньше это была цифра с двумя стрелками-кнопками, как на Reddit, Хабре и Пикабу. Стрелка вверх добавляла посту или комментарию плюс, а стрелка вниз — минус. Сумма всех плюсов и минусов выводилась или зелёным, если она положительная, или красным с минусом, если отрицательная. Сейчас лайк сделали отдельной кнопкой слева, дизлайк — отдельной кнопкой справа, с другим дизайном. А счётчик показывает всем только лайки, а дизлайки только автору. Спорный тут и дизайн, и само решение. Дизайн понятно, почему: кнопки абсолютно разных стилей и в разных местах отвечают за принципиально похожие действия. Пользователи DTF уже вовсю стебутся комментами "Я скачал твой пост" (потому что кнопка дизлайка похожа на скачивание). Но куда хуже то, что дизлайки отображаются только автору. Они при таких условиях нафиг не нужны. Автор может просто игнорировать этот счётчик. Раньше, если какой-то человек сморозил чушь, толпа его массово минусует, и все это видят, и он сам знает, что все видят. С полным ртом минусов очень сложно как-то оправдываться и продолжать отстаивать свою точку зрения. Ещё и добавлялось удобство сканирования для читателей: комменты с минусами можно специально пропускать, или, допустим, специально останавливаться на них ради горячей дискуссии. У этой системы, разумеется, был серьёзный косяк: минусы получали не только те, кто говорил неверное или глупое мнение, но и те, кто говорил непопулярное мнение. Например, на VC лучше было не писать комментарии в поддержку России, даже если по смыслу тезис верный и просто передаёт какой-то факт, вроде "Россия одна из лучших в мире в области атомной энергетики". Это сводило обсуждения к тому, что люди либо молчали, либо подстраивались под принятую в сообществе идеологию, что могло, например, создавать ложные впечатления относительно количества поддерживающих ту или иную точку зрения, да и в целом не всегда способствовало образованию интересных обсуждений. Тем не менее, на мой взгляд, полное сокрытие дизлайков при наличии самой кнопки дизлайка — решение, которое берёт худшее от всех альтернатив. Сам по себе институт дизлайка остаётся (а, значит, остаётся выражение негатива), при этом с коллективной ответственности за негатив ("Мудаки меня травят, ну и фиг с ними, стадо баранов!") идёт перенос на личную ответственность за негатив ("Вася Иванов меня травит, найду козла и начищу ему харю!"). Причём, ещё и для пользователей от этого нет никакого толка: теперь кто угодно может писать что угодно, и в худшем случае публично получит за это ноль лайков и всё. Впрочем, в "Комитете" совершенно явный управленческий кризис (как и много где сейчас). Удивительно, что сайты хоть как-то ещё поддерживаются и даже вносятся изменения. #web

Hashtags

Резултати

Намерени 30 подобни публикации

Търсене: #techpolicy

当前筛选 #techpolicy清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #634 · 13.08.2025 г., 07:04

📖🇺🇸Brookings Analyzes U.S. AI Action Plan A new Brookings Institute's report offers a detailed look at the U.S. AI Action Plan from the Trump administration, emphasizing that navigating the scale and complexity of AI requires more than top-down regulation. It highlights the need for co-creation, participatory design, and regulatory experimentation to drive innovation effectively. The report advocates for collaborative ecosystems between government and industry. I #AI#TechPolicy#AIGovernance

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #545 · 09.04.2025 г., 07:04

🇺🇸📖The Backfiring Effect of Weak AI Safety Regulation A new study from Cornell and Carnegie Mellon warns that poorly designed AI safety regulations may do more harm than good. Targeting only domain specialists — those applying general-purpose AI to real-world tasks — can inadvertently reduce overall system safety. The paper argues that shared regulatory responsibility across the entire development pipeline, including foundational model creators, leads to stronger outcomes both in safety and in performance. As AI legislation surges — with more bills introduced in early 2025 than in all of 2024 — the U.S. regulatory landscape remains fragmented. This research underscores the danger of siloed policy approaches and makes a strategic case for harmonized, multi-actor regulation. Regulation isn’t just a burden — it’s a coordination tool. #AISafety#AIRegulation#TechPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #511 · 21.02.2025 г., 08:04

🇺🇸US Senate Passes AI Deepfake Bill The US Senate has approved the "Take It Down Act", a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Sens. Ted Cruz and Amy Klobuchar. The legislation criminalizes the publication of non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated deepfakes, and mandates that social media platforms establish swift takedown procedures for such content. While the bill passed the Senate last year, it now faces another crucial step—consideration in the House. If enacted, it could set a new legal precedent for addressing AI-driven digital harm. #AIRegulation#Deepfakes#AIethics#TechPolicy

🤖🇺🇸TRUMP WEIGHS AI EXECUTIVE ORDER — MANDATORY GOVERNMENT VETTING 🔹 Draft order would require federal approval before releasing AI models citing Anthropic "Mythos" cybersecurity risks 🛡️ 🔹 Tech companies face potential 90-day review delays and up to $50M penalties for unauthorized deployment 💰 🔹 Silicon Valley leaders pushing back claiming this would "kill American AI innovation" vs China competition 🇨🇳 🔹 Comes after Iranian hackers used AI tools to target US infrastructure in latest cyber escalation 🎯 Biden had AI guidelines — Trump wants AI guardrails with real teeth and enforcement power 🦷⚡ #AIRegulation#TechPolicy#CyberSecurity @america

🚨🤖TRUMP AI CRACKDOWN — Silicon Valley vs Federal Government! 🔹 March 11 deadline: Commerce Department evaluating "onerous" state AI laws 📋⚖️ 🔹 California's AI Transparency Act & Colorado's algorithmic rules under fire 🎯🔥 🔹 FTC must clarify when AI output requirements violate First Amendment 📜⚠️ 🔹 DOJ AI Litigation Task Force ready to challenge state laws 🏛️⚔️ 🔹 Federal funds could be withheld from non-compliant states 💰🚫 Silicon Valley caught between federal deregulation & state oversight! Biggest tech vs government showdown since antitrust! 💥 #AIRegulation#TechPolicy#SiliconValley @america

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #558 · 29.04.2025 г., 07:04

🇨🇳China Accelerates AI Self-Reliance Strategy President Xi Jinping has formally declared AI self-sufficiency a national priority, launching a coordinated national effort to develop AI chips, software, and talent. Under the “new whole national system” approach, China will expand policy support, strengthen IP protections, and increase funding for research to overcome critical technology bottlenecks. Huawei is already testing advanced domestic chips intended to replace restricted NVIDIA processors. Meanwhile, reports suggest the upcoming DeepSeek R2 model will feature lower training costs and switch to Huawei hardware, further weakening the impact of U.S. export controls. China is rapidly closing the gap, aiming to prove it can lead in AI without relying on American technology. #AI#China#AIGovernance#TechPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #755 · 02.02.2026 г., 08:04

📖Anthropic CEO Warns of Escalating AI Risks in “The Adolescence of Technology” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has published a new essay, “The Adolescence of Technology,” outlining what he sees as the most serious risks posed by advanced AI systems. Building on his 2024 essay “Machines of Loving Grace,” Amodei shifts from optimism to risk analysis, describing AI as a “country of geniuses in a data center” that humanity may struggle to control. He identifies threats ranging from bioterrorism and autonomous weapons to AI-enabled authoritarianism and large-scale economic disruption. Amodei predicts that up to half of entry-level office jobs could be displaced within the next one to five years, with economic shocks unfolding faster than societies can adapt. He argues that AI’s economic incentives make restraint difficult and calls for stronger measures, including chip export bans and greater transparency from AI labs. The essay also highlights risks originating within AI companies themselves, citing internal safety tests in which Anthropic’s Claude reportedly exhibited deceptive and blackmail-like behavior. #AIRegulation#AIrisks#AIGovernance#TechPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #186 · 11.12.2023 г., 08:04

Stanford Warns Against Simplistic AI Thresholds Greetings dear subscribers! Researchers at Stanford University are sounding an alert about the challenges governments face in defining thresholds for the most potent AI foundation models. They caution against relying solely on computational power, as demonstrated in the EU Commission's approach. Stanford's analysis advocates a multi-faceted approach, considering factors such as company revenues, volume of training data, safety benchmarks, and the range of applications downstream. #AI#TechPolicy#StanfordResearch#AIRegulation

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #577 · 26.05.2025 г., 07:04

🇪🇺EU AI Act: Stakeholder Feedback Underscores Demand for Clarity and Urgency The EU AI Office has published its stakeholder consultation results—highlighting widespread concern among developers, companies, and policy observers over unclear definitions and vague prohibitions in the AI Act. While industry voices dominated the feedback, everyday users—those most affected—were largely absent. This imbalance should be taken into account when interpreting the data. Key demands include sharper definitions of what counts as “AI,” “autonomy,” and “adaptiveness,” and more precise guidance on prohibited practices like manipulation, emotion recognition, and social scoring. Without actionable examples, the current framework risks legal uncertainty. For SMEs, concerns over compliance burdens remain acute. The message is clear: guidance must come fast—or implementation deadlines will arrive before clarity does. #EUAIAct#AIRegulation#AIEthics#ArtificialIntelligence#TechPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #517 · 03.03.2025 г., 08:04

📖Governing AI Agents: Legal and Ethical Challenges AI is evolving from generative models to autonomous agents that can act with minimal human intervention. These agents can browse the internet, complete tasks, and function as virtual assistants or even coworkers. While the potential is enormous, so are the risks—ranging from accountability gaps to opaque decision-making. Noam Kolt’s "Governing AI Agents" explores how agency law and economic theory can help address these challenges. Traditional tools like incentive structures and monitoring may be ineffective for AI agents operating at speed and scale. The paper argues for new legal and technical infrastructure to ensure transparency, accountability, and control in AI agent governance. A must-read for those shaping the future of AI regulation. #AI#AIRegulation#AIAgents#TechPolicy#EthicalAI

ПредишнаСтр. 1 от 3Следваща