TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← GZ学习频道

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Find similar content

Source channel @olddriverGDstudy · Post #29 · Mar 17

搜索使用说明 #搜索指南 因为电报软件对中文搜索支持不好,大队特别对队内资源搜索进行了整理汇集,使用方法说明如下: 1.1 原理: 电报对中文搜索支持不佳,汉字只有在前后含有asic码字符的前提下可以被正确搜索出,如 _广州修车大队_ (“_”指代空格)、(广州修车大队);等形式可以搜索“广州修车大队”搜索出相关信息;搜索“广州”等未被asic码间隔的汉字无法正确显示。 为正确搜索,在编制频道资源时,对重要信息可以采取Hashtag的形式已方便搜索,即以"#"字符开头,接汉字,以“空格字符”结尾的形式,点击一个hashtag即可快速定位该频道或聊天群内所有相同标签,建议所有管理在编辑重要资料包括ls信息、广播台、学习频道时正确使用hashtag。 !!注意标签不要随意编写,要参考搜索指南中有的标签类型!! 1.2 JS资源定位: JS目前支持 Hasgtag(#K老师)、数字标签(#GZ003)的搜索方式,在对应榜单和报告区中试用上述方式均可查找到JS的相关信息。 使用举例:在“广州公开榜”或“广州修车大队”的搜索栏中输入 #K老师 或 #GZ003,均可定位到K老师资料页;在报告区的搜索栏中输入#K老师 或 #GZ003,均可定位到K老师的验证报告。这两者是快速了解JS基本信息和评价的便捷办法。 1.3 标签查找 公榜榜单目前均支持标签查找,可以快速定位某种类型或地区的所有JS,目前仅支持Hashtag查找,目前常用标签解释如下: 地区标签: 一定要使用一级标签,例如 #天河区(注意不要有错别字) #颜值: 不解释 #服务: 评价中92、95的,有场子出身花式水平的,均会归入此类; #大胸: 不解释,一般D以上归入此类; #长腿: 不解释,一般168以上归入此类; #身材: 不解释,较为宽松; #嫩妹: 22岁以下或者长相很嫩的,白小纯的,loli系的,cos系的归入此类; #熟女: 30岁以上风韵犹存的,归入此类; #特服: 提供3p、3t、wt、字母等特殊服务的JS归入此类。 使用举例:在红榜的搜索栏中输入 #长腿,可以快速查看“莉贝伦”等8位长腿JS。 类型标签评价目前非常主观,有不妥之处请队内私信 JackJack 或其他管理人员修改。 1.4 资料查找 目前学习频道中试用hashtag来快速定位资料,目前使用的标签有如下几种: #安全CJ#素质CJ#卫生CJ #搜索指南 #大队玩法 #语录#秀哥语录 #技巧#知识

Results

2 similar posts found

Search: #deterrence

当前筛选 #deterrence清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5576 · 04/05/2026, 11:59 PM

📰 The Fire Has a Chain of Command Iran’s retaliation is not random, and that is the bad news for everyone pretending this is just a chaos machine with missiles. Ynet reports that Tehran is now targeting parallel sectors — energy for energy, nuclear for nuclear, universities for universities — instead of merely answering one strike with one strike. That is not rage. That is calibration. Danny Citrinowicz said the fire “isn't random” and argued the pattern shows command and control is still intact; in other words, Tehran is not emptying the magazine, it is choosing the rooms. The ugly part is that the target list keeps widening. Haifa follows South Pars, Dimona follows Natanz, Ras Laffan follows the Gulf strikes, and now even universities are being floated as legitimate targets. So the “eye for an eye” slogan has already become a business plan for escalation. Everyone keeps speaking the language of deterrence while the region is being taught, sector by sector, what retaliation looks like when both sides insist on calling it strategy. #Iran#Israel#war#deterrence#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5062 · 02/05/2026, 08:02 PM

📰 The Nuclear Arms Control Era Is Over — and Everyone Is Going to Arms The last nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia is dead. On Thursday, New START expired, and for the first time since 1972, the two superpowers are left with no formal limits on the size or structure of their arsenals — just as both are racing to build new nuclear weapons and delivery systems that even the drafters of the original deals never imagined. The era of “managed doom” is over. The era of open‑ended arms racing has begun. Donald Trump has framed the expiration as a feature, not a bug. When asked in January why he hadn’t accepted Vladimir Putin’s offer of a one‑year informal extension, he shrugged: “If it expires, it expires,” he told The New York Times. He insisted a “better agreement” could be negotiated later — one that includes China and “other parties.” Beijing has already made clear it is not interested. The result is a triangular nuclear race where the U.S., Russia, and China are all expanding their arsenals, while the old treaties that once constrained them lie in the dust. The U.S. is preparing to deploy more nuclear warheads on its largest submarines, and to build up a new generation of nuclear‑capable cruise missiles and hypersonic platforms modeled after Russian and Chinese designs. Russia is experimenting with undersea and space‑based nuclear weapons and openly floating the idea of battlefield use; China is abandoning its old “minimum deterrent” posture and moving toward an arsenal that could rival Washington and Moscow. While the U.S. and Russia have cut their stockpiles from Cold War peaks, other countries are doing the opposite — Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Poland, and others are quietly asking whether they can still rely on the American “nuclear umbrella” — or whether they need their own warheads. Trump’s National Security Strategy barely mentions this shift. The only real acknowledgment appears in the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, which documents Beijing’s 600‑plus warheads, on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030. The strategy also sidesteps another danger: Putin’s repeated, barely veiled threats to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The White House seems to be betting that deterrence will hold, even as the world returns to the logic of the 1950s and 1960s — when every serious politician was expected to understand the nuclear balance. Back then, nuclear weapons dominated presidential debates, front‑page headlines, and pop‑culture nightmares. Today, nuclear danger is everywhere but rarely debated. The question is no longer whether the U.S. can “eliminate nuclear weapons,” as Barack Obama promised in Prague. It is whether Washington can prevent the next arms race from spinning out of control — and whether the rest of the world is ready to join the game. #nuclear#NewSTART#Russia#China#US#Trump#Putin#Xi#armsrace#deterrence#NYTimes 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸