TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← GZ学习频道

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Find similar content

Source channel @olddriverGDstudy · Post #29 · Mar 17

搜索使用说明 #搜索指南 因为电报软件对中文搜索支持不好,大队特别对队内资源搜索进行了整理汇集,使用方法说明如下: 1.1 原理: 电报对中文搜索支持不佳,汉字只有在前后含有asic码字符的前提下可以被正确搜索出,如 _广州修车大队_ (“_”指代空格)、(广州修车大队);等形式可以搜索“广州修车大队”搜索出相关信息;搜索“广州”等未被asic码间隔的汉字无法正确显示。 为正确搜索,在编制频道资源时,对重要信息可以采取Hashtag的形式已方便搜索,即以"#"字符开头,接汉字,以“空格字符”结尾的形式,点击一个hashtag即可快速定位该频道或聊天群内所有相同标签,建议所有管理在编辑重要资料包括ls信息、广播台、学习频道时正确使用hashtag。 !!注意标签不要随意编写,要参考搜索指南中有的标签类型!! 1.2 JS资源定位: JS目前支持 Hasgtag(#K老师)、数字标签(#GZ003)的搜索方式,在对应榜单和报告区中试用上述方式均可查找到JS的相关信息。 使用举例:在“广州公开榜”或“广州修车大队”的搜索栏中输入 #K老师 或 #GZ003,均可定位到K老师资料页;在报告区的搜索栏中输入#K老师 或 #GZ003,均可定位到K老师的验证报告。这两者是快速了解JS基本信息和评价的便捷办法。 1.3 标签查找 公榜榜单目前均支持标签查找,可以快速定位某种类型或地区的所有JS,目前仅支持Hashtag查找,目前常用标签解释如下: 地区标签: 一定要使用一级标签,例如 #天河区(注意不要有错别字) #颜值: 不解释 #服务: 评价中92、95的,有场子出身花式水平的,均会归入此类; #大胸: 不解释,一般D以上归入此类; #长腿: 不解释,一般168以上归入此类; #身材: 不解释,较为宽松; #嫩妹: 22岁以下或者长相很嫩的,白小纯的,loli系的,cos系的归入此类; #熟女: 30岁以上风韵犹存的,归入此类; #特服: 提供3p、3t、wt、字母等特殊服务的JS归入此类。 使用举例:在红榜的搜索栏中输入 #长腿,可以快速查看“莉贝伦”等8位长腿JS。 类型标签评价目前非常主观,有不妥之处请队内私信 JackJack 或其他管理人员修改。 1.4 资料查找 目前学习频道中试用hashtag来快速定位资料,目前使用的标签有如下几种: #安全CJ#素质CJ#卫生CJ #搜索指南 #大队玩法 #语录#秀哥语录 #技巧#知识

Results

6 similar posts found

Search: #misinformation

当前筛选 #misinformation清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #489 · 01/22/2025, 08:04 AM

🇺🇸Apple’s AI News Summaries Pulled After False Headlines Apple has temporarily disabled its AI-powered news summary feature in Apple Intelligence following incidents where the system generated fabricated headlines, including false reports of arrests and deaths. The feature, launched in September with the iPhone 16, aimed to condense multiple notifications into concise summaries but quickly faced backlash from major news outlets, such as the BBC and The Washington Post. The BBC raised concerns as early as December, citing critical factual errors in breaking news summaries and warning that the tool contradicted original reporting, undermining public trust. In response, Apple announced plans to enhance transparency by clearly labeling AI-generated summaries and allowing users more control over the feature. This setback highlights the risks of deploying AI solutions without rigorous testing in sensitive domains like journalism. With trust at stake, companies must prioritize accuracy, accountability, and collaboration with stakeholders to ensure their AI systems uphold professional standards. #AI#Apple#Misinformation#AIEthics

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #807 · 04/15/2026, 07:05 AM

📖Fake Disease Experiment Exposes AI Misinformation Risks Researchers led by Almira Osmanovic Thunström at the University of Gothenburg created a fictional medical condition, “bixonimania,” and supported it with fabricated academic papers uploaded to a preprint server. The experiment aimed to test whether large language models would reproduce false information as credible medical knowledge. AI systems subsequently presented the non-existent disease as real, and the fake studies were later cited in peer-reviewed literature, including a journal published by Springer Nature. The case demonstrates how AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation can propagate beyond initial sources into scientific and medical contexts. #AIRegulation#AIethics#Misinformation#AIsafety#DigitalHealth

Okeefe Media Group

@OKeefeMedia · Post #411 · 11/15/2023, 09:43 AM

#censorship#misinformation#disinformation#firstamendment Bombshell Congressional Report Outlines Structure of ‘Censorship Industrial Complex’ The House Judiciary Committee released a damning report a week ago proving what we have known all along: that government forces sought to silence and deplatform voices on the right during the 2020 election and beyond, including yours truly. You’ll remember back when O'Keefe was with Project Veritas that James SUED the Election Integrity Project in Washington State, at Stanford and the University of Washington. However, a judge moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the statements about Veritas are not actionable because they are not factual statements, because they are not capable of being proven true, and because the academic researcher’s statements “lack precision.” The district court concluded that readers of Stanford and the University of Washington’s academic analysis would have expected to encounter analysis that reflected the authors’ “subjective biases,” including “mischaracterizations and exaggerations,” and thus the specific statements that Project Veritas took issue with were not actionable for defamation because they were not “capable of verification or refutation by means of objective proof.” In the judge’s order dismissing our lawsuit, he notes the statement that our video had been “debunked” is incapable of being proven true or false." “A reasonable inference to be drawn from the complaint," Thomas S Zilly, US District Judge ,concluded, "is that readers of the EIP blog post would have had some awareness of the allegedly left-leaning biases of the authors." The most chilling part is, the government has no plans to stop this unconstitutional “Election Integrity Partnership” censoring program. Expect to see more of the same into the new year, when the election really gets underway. @OKeefeMedia

Crypto M - Crypto News

@CryptoM · Post #65068 · 04/10/2026, 06:21 PM

🚀 YZi Labs Advises Verification of Information Sources Good morning to all. YZi Labs posted on X, advising individuals to verify any information purportedly from them through their official X account or the official contacts on Stay SAFU. This ensures the authenticity of the information and helps prevent misinformation. #YZiLabs#InformationVerification#Misinformation#StaySAFU#CyberSecurity

Crypto M - Crypto News

@CryptoM · Post #65025 · 04/10/2026, 02:22 PM

🚀 AI TRENDS | OpenAI to Be Regulated Under EU's Digital Services Act, Sources Say OpenAI is set to be regulated under the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA), according to sources cited by Handelsblatt. The company will be classified as a very large online search engine under the new regulations. According to Jin10, this classification will subject OpenAI to stricter compliance requirements aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability in its operations. The DSA is part of the EU's broader effort to regulate digital services and platforms, enhancing user protection and addressing issues such as misinformation and data privacy. OpenAI's inclusion under this regulatory framework highlights the growing scrutiny of AI technologies and their impact on society. #AI#OpenAI#EU#DigitalServicesAct#DSA#Regulation#TechPolicy#DataPrivacy#Misinformation#Transparency#Accountability