TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← GZ学习频道

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Find similar content

Source channel @olddriverGDstudy · Post #49 · Mar 24

江湖舔狗传 江湖者,江湖也! 各兄弟五湖四海汇聚一堂,为的是个情字,讲的是个义字,说的是个道理。 江湖上无数前辈好汉,忍饥挨饿,夜以继日,通宵达旦,上下求索,陷过无数的坑,踏破无数双鞋换得了有限的几个极品资源,未曾敢占为己有,而是毫无保留,无私公布奉献。 这一切为什么?为的是天下草根、屌丝们,不受仙人跳之苦,不遭各种骗费之难,不枉花了辛苦搬砖的银两盘缠,这是多么高尚的精神,多么高贵的品质啊! 江湖就是江湖,林子大了什么鸟儿都有,舔狗们也像病毒般出没,为害人间。这些禽兽毫无尊严、毫无底线,从溜须拍马、到阿谀奉承,从冷屁股到甜盘子全方位无死角。 舔狗,做着劝婊子从良的梦,抱着救风尘女子出火坑的“崇高”的性幻想,岂不知自己已是婊子口中的笑话! 江湖有江湖的规矩,江湖有江湖的原则,江湖有江湖的风貌,江湖有江湖的脾气。 我知舔狗是死不光的,这一车死光了,下一车还在路上。 但舔狗永远不过是个道具而已,又何必自作多情。 舔狗,你听,电话声已响起,你的钟到了!闭上臭嘴,滚出去把门关上! 作者:41秒哥 标签:#语录

Hashtags

Results

2 similar posts found

Search: #deterrence

当前筛选 #deterrence清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5576 · 04/05/2026, 11:59 PM

📰 The Fire Has a Chain of Command Iran’s retaliation is not random, and that is the bad news for everyone pretending this is just a chaos machine with missiles. Ynet reports that Tehran is now targeting parallel sectors — energy for energy, nuclear for nuclear, universities for universities — instead of merely answering one strike with one strike. That is not rage. That is calibration. Danny Citrinowicz said the fire “isn't random” and argued the pattern shows command and control is still intact; in other words, Tehran is not emptying the magazine, it is choosing the rooms. The ugly part is that the target list keeps widening. Haifa follows South Pars, Dimona follows Natanz, Ras Laffan follows the Gulf strikes, and now even universities are being floated as legitimate targets. So the “eye for an eye” slogan has already become a business plan for escalation. Everyone keeps speaking the language of deterrence while the region is being taught, sector by sector, what retaliation looks like when both sides insist on calling it strategy. #Iran#Israel#war#deterrence#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5062 · 02/05/2026, 08:02 PM

📰 The Nuclear Arms Control Era Is Over — and Everyone Is Going to Arms The last nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia is dead. On Thursday, New START expired, and for the first time since 1972, the two superpowers are left with no formal limits on the size or structure of their arsenals — just as both are racing to build new nuclear weapons and delivery systems that even the drafters of the original deals never imagined. The era of “managed doom” is over. The era of open‑ended arms racing has begun. Donald Trump has framed the expiration as a feature, not a bug. When asked in January why he hadn’t accepted Vladimir Putin’s offer of a one‑year informal extension, he shrugged: “If it expires, it expires,” he told The New York Times. He insisted a “better agreement” could be negotiated later — one that includes China and “other parties.” Beijing has already made clear it is not interested. The result is a triangular nuclear race where the U.S., Russia, and China are all expanding their arsenals, while the old treaties that once constrained them lie in the dust. The U.S. is preparing to deploy more nuclear warheads on its largest submarines, and to build up a new generation of nuclear‑capable cruise missiles and hypersonic platforms modeled after Russian and Chinese designs. Russia is experimenting with undersea and space‑based nuclear weapons and openly floating the idea of battlefield use; China is abandoning its old “minimum deterrent” posture and moving toward an arsenal that could rival Washington and Moscow. While the U.S. and Russia have cut their stockpiles from Cold War peaks, other countries are doing the opposite — Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Poland, and others are quietly asking whether they can still rely on the American “nuclear umbrella” — or whether they need their own warheads. Trump’s National Security Strategy barely mentions this shift. The only real acknowledgment appears in the Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military power, which documents Beijing’s 600‑plus warheads, on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030. The strategy also sidesteps another danger: Putin’s repeated, barely veiled threats to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The White House seems to be betting that deterrence will hold, even as the world returns to the logic of the 1950s and 1960s — when every serious politician was expected to understand the nuclear balance. Back then, nuclear weapons dominated presidential debates, front‑page headlines, and pop‑culture nightmares. Today, nuclear danger is everywhere but rarely debated. The question is no longer whether the U.S. can “eliminate nuclear weapons,” as Barack Obama promised in Prague. It is whether Washington can prevent the next arms race from spinning out of control — and whether the rest of the world is ready to join the game. #nuclear#NewSTART#Russia#China#US#Trump#Putin#Xi#armsrace#deterrence#NYTimes 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸