djangoproject

https://vorpus.org/blog/some-thoughts-on-asynchronous-api-design-in-a-post-asyncawait-world/#websocket-servers I've recently been exploring the exciting new world of #asynchronous I/O libraries in Python 3 – specifically asyncio and curio. These two libraries make some different design choices. Example 1: #asyncio, with callbacks Example 2: #curio, with #async/#await Example 3: asyncio, with async/await #websockets

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/ #Coroutines with #async and #await syntax

https://www.obeythetestinggoat.com/testing-async-asyncio-and-performance.html #Testing, #async, #asyncio, and #performance Sun 27 December 2015 By Harry I recently did some experimenting with asyncio, and wanted to report back on how I got on with writing tests for it. While I was at it I was also able to compare its performance with a couple of other approaches to #mutlitasking in Python, namely #threads and #gevent, so I'll report on that here too. (tl;dr: it's much of a muchness).

https://bit.ly/coroutines At Open Source Bridge and #PyGotham in 2015, and at SCALE14x, I demonstrated that you can code a Python 3 #async framework in under an hour. I start the demo by writing a callback-based async framework, built on non-blocking sockets and a simple event loop. Then I adapt the framework to use generator-based #coroutines, which are cleaner than callbacks but still more efficient than threads for async I/O.