TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← GitHub Trends

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Find similar content

Source channel @githubtrending · Post #14925 · Jul 7

#typescript#12_factor#12_factor_agents#agents#ai#context_window#framework#llms#memory#orchestration#prompt_engineering#rag The 12-Factor Agents are a set of proven principles to build reliable, scalable, and maintainable AI applications powered by large language models (LLMs). They help you combine the creativity of AI with the stability of traditional software by managing prompts, context, tool calls, error handling, and human collaboration effectively. Instead of relying solely on complex frameworks, you can apply these modular concepts to improve your existing products quickly and reach high-quality AI performance for real users. This approach makes AI software easier to develop, debug, and scale, ensuring it works well in production environments[1][3][5]. https://github.com/humanlayer/12-factor-agents

Results

1 similar post found

Search: #aiinfluence

当前筛选 #aiinfluence清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #147 · 10/25/2023, 07:04 AM

Proposed Chinese AI Safety Standards: A Closer Look Hey there, AI & Law community! On October 11, the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee in China released a draft document outlining precise regulations for evaluating generative AI models. Unlike the often vague AI regulations, this document provides a clear blueprint for compliance. This standards proposal sets forth rigorous criteria for assessing AI data sources and their content. The document covers topics like training data diversity, moderation, and prohibited content. It emphasizes the need for diversified training corpora and the assessment of data quality. If more than 5% of data is "illegal and negative information," the corpus is flagged for future training. The proposal also suggests that AI companies employ moderators to enhance generated content quality, aligning with national policies and third-party complaints. This implies a potential expansion of the human-driven moderation and censorship workforce in the AI era. Companies are tasked with identifying hundreds of keywords for flagging unsafe or banned content, with separate categories for political and discriminative content. They must also generate more than 2,000 prompts, ensuring fewer than 10% of responses breach the rules. Interestingly, the document encourages subtler censorship measures, such as not refusing to answer sensitive prompts but allowing AI models to respond to specific, non-sensitive inquiries. It's crucial to clarify that these standards are not laws, and non-compliance doesn't result in penalties. However, proposals like these can significantly influence future regulations or work alongside them. The standards receive input from tech experts hired by companies, giving corporations like Huawei, Alibaba, and Tencent a say in shaping these regulations. Their influence could have far-reaching implications for the global AI industry and how AI technologies are regulated worldwide. #AISafety#AIRegulations#GenerativeAI#ContentModeration#ChineseTech#AIInfluence#GlobalAI