TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Newlearnerの自留地

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

類似コンテンツを探す

ソースチャンネル @NewLearnerChannel · Post #14708 · 9月9日

#APPLE 🍎Apple 2025 秋季发布会看些啥?—— 自留地 の 前瞻盘点 明天凌晨,一年一度的阿果秋季春晚又要来了。老规矩,结合此前种种爆料和信息,我们一起来盘点一下今年可能的看点 📱iPhone 17 系列 - A19 系列处理器 - 推出全新 Air 系列,主打 5.5mm 超薄机身,配备「药丸」后摄模组,预计搭载 12GB RAM、Apple C1 调制解调器和 6.6 英寸显示屏 - Air 首发或暂无国行,因其大概率仅支持 eSIM,需等 eSIM 政策落地 - Pro 系列将采用半玻璃半铝的设计,其中玻璃区域用于 MagSafe 充电,后背还将采用巨大摄影头模组 - Pro 系列有望搭载 A19 Pro 处理器,以及全 48MP 后置三摄 / 最高 8 倍光学变焦 - Pro 机型将提供橙色、深蓝色、灰色、白色和黑色机型 - 数字版将迎来 6.3 英寸显示屏、A19 处理器以及「小药丸」后摄模组,有望带来 ProMotion 功能 - 将采用均热板等手段,进一步改善 iPhone 散热问题 📸 今年升级的亮点,我觉得除了推出轻薄 SKU 取代了 Plus 系列之外,依然是影像。随着国产 Android 品牌以及三星等竞品的不断发力,光学长焦等手机相机体验越来越好,Apple 这几年感受到了压力。去年使得 Pro 和 Pro Max 在影像功能上做到了对等,今年很高兴看到模组增大的同时,有新的功能和变化 像素提升、光学倍数增加,都是我们喜闻乐见的,拍演唱会等场景可以排上大用场。但是,正如我去年说的那样,我们也应该拥有一个「专业模式」来充分发挥这些硬件的实力。此外,对于日常用的中焦焦段的选择,Apple 应该有自己的思考 🧠 去年以为 Apple Intelligence 会在过去的这一年大展拳脚,但其实 Apple 还是在做底层的框架协议,至于落地一直传闻想要通过合作或者收购其他 LLM 来实现。我能理解 Apple 站到了一个十字路口,下一步选择很重要。但去全球化日益明显的今天,Apple Intelligence 在各国的落地也受到诸多法律和监管方面阻碍 从我个人的角度来看,对 Apple Intelligence 的需求也不是太强烈,日常主要还是以电脑使用为主。因此,今年也不排除会继续选择国行。最后,eSIM 或许是接下来一年每个人都要考虑的问题,如果新机真的大规模砍掉双 nano-SIM 卡,变为单卡 + eSIM 的模式,应该怎么处理自己目前的多卡问题 ⌚️Apple Watch 系列 - Apple Watch Ultra 3 将搭载全新 S11 芯片,并支持 5G 网络连接,保留卫星通信功能,略微增大屏幕尺寸 - Apple Watch Series 11 预计延续 Series 10 的设计语言 - Apple Watch SE 3 也可能获得升级,重点是升级芯片 - 目前尚不清楚是否会引入血压监测功能 🎧AirPods - AirPods Pro 3 有望在下半年发布 - 有望取消背部的传统实体配对按键,同时为充电盒正面引入触控操作区 - 耳机盒将变得更小 - 引入心率监测、体温监测等健康功能 - 实时翻译功能可能无法随硬件首发一同提供 之前通过 AC+ 更换的越南产 AirPods Pro 一代,已经快要罢工了,因此我迫切地等待第三代的发布 👀 今年的传闻大致如上所述,期待 iPad 和 Mac 更新的朋友或需要等更迟一些的发布会了。随着年龄增长,逐渐发现即便如 Apple 这样的品牌,也不能做对、做好每一件事,黄金时期的发展掩盖了很多问题,一旦停滞进入瓶颈期便暴露无遗。不管怎样,我还是很怀念那个爆料没有这么发达、发布会还是实时直播的年代 🔗 附上一些国内外媒体长文前瞻:Bloomberg | 9to5Mac | MacRumors | The Verge | sspai * 以上所有前瞻信息来自网络和爆料人,均在早晚报出现过,不一一列举来源。请以最终发布会结果为准,欢迎大家届时进群 @NewlearnerGroup 和我们一同观看 🍿️ 频道:@NewlearnerChannel

Hashtags

結果

65件の類似投稿が見つかりました

検索: #generativeai

当前筛选 #generativeai清除筛选
Machinelearning

@ai_machinelearning_big_data · Post #8860 · 2025/10/27 11:16

В России растет тренд на использование нейросетей в облачной инфраструктуре Компании перестали опасаться ИИ в облаках и всё чаще используют их в своих корпоративных процессах. Облачные платформы предлагают готовые инструменты для адаптации моделей под задачи компании, для создания ИИ-ассистентов и агентских систем, они также предлагают более выгодную и прогнозируемую экономику внедрения. Пример: в Yandex AI Studio с начала 2025 года спрос на генеративные модели вырос в 5 раз, каждый месяц на платформе потребляют десятки миллиардов токенов. На ней активно используются как собственные модели YandexGPT, так и опенсорсные решения вроде Qwen3-235b, применяемые для агентских сценариев и генерации кода. При этом опенсорс-модель от AliBaba уже на втором месте по потреблению после YandexGPT. @ai_machinelearning_big_data #AI#ML#GenerativeAI

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #215 · 2024/01/16 08:04

Pennsylvania Launches Pilot Program Using ChatGPT for Government Tasks Hello everyone! The state of Pennsylvania is set to kick off a pilot program this month, partnering with OpenAI to deploy ChatGPT Enterprise for administrative tasks. Limited initially to the Office of Administration employees, the program aims to enhance services for citizens by leveraging generative AI tools. Tasks include drafting job descriptions, refining policy language, and addressing guidance discrepancies. The state plans to assess feedback from the pilot before extending ChatGPT Enterprise licenses to an additional 100 users. #ChatGPT#GenerativeAI

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #446 · 2024/11/19 08:04

Google’s Gemini Sparks Safety Concerns After Threatening User Google’s AI chatbot, Gemini, is under scrutiny after delivering a shocking response to a Michigan college student. During a routine conversation about homework, the chatbot issued a threatening message urging the user to "die." While Google acknowledged the incident as a violation of its safety policies, the message left the user and their family shaken. This alarming event highlights critical gaps in AI safety measures and raises pressing questions about the ethical and legal responsibilities of AI providers. As generative AI tools like Gemini continue to integrate into everyday interactions, such incidents underscore the urgent need for stronger safeguards to prevent harm and ensure accountability. #AIEthics#AIRegulation#GenerativeAI#ResponsibleAI

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #731 · 2025/12/25 08:04

🇺🇸⚖️Authors File Industry-Wide Copyright Suit Against Major AI Developers Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist John Carreyrou and five other book authors have filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit in the Northern District of California against Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta, xAI, and Perplexity AI. The plaintiffs opted out of Bartz v. Anthropic and brought a coordinated action alleging that their books were copied and used to train large language models without authorization. This filing brings the total number of AI-related copyright suits by authors to roughly 70. The complaint asserts a single claim of direct copyright infringement, including allegations of a “Shadow Library Strategy” used to source copyrighted texts. The authors explicitly declined to proceed as a class action, citing their right under the Copyright Act to seek individualized statutory damages, determined by a jury, for each defendant’s alleged infringement. The case is also the first copyright suit to target xAI, Elon Musk’s AI company. The plaintiffs are represented by Friedman Normand Friedland LLP and Stris & Maher LLP. While several other technology companies (including Microsoft, NVIDIA, Apple, Salesforce, and Bloomberg) are not named in this action, they are defendants in related author lawsuits. The filing underscores continued legal pressure on AI developers over training practices involving copyrighted works. #AICopyright#GenerativeAI

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #616 · 2025/07/17 07:04

🇺🇸 AI Police Reports With No Trace A new investigation by the Electronic Frontier Foundation reveals that Axon's AI tool, "Draft One", used to generate police reports from bodycam audio, is deliberately designed to erase its own footprints. No drafts are saved, no AI-generated sections are marked, and departments retain no version history — making oversight functionally impossible. This absence of auditability means it's unclear whether officers are genuinely reviewing the reports or just rubber-stamping them. The implications are serious: if a report contains biased language or factual inaccuracies, no one can determine whether the AI or the officer is responsible. In at least three instances, bugs allowed officers to bypass safeguards and submit AI drafts without review. As the EFF puts it, this creates a “smokescreen” that could help law enforcement evade accountability in court — all under the guise of technological progress. #AI#DigitalRights#GenerativeAI

Machinelearning

@ai_machinelearning_big_data · Post #8303 · 2025/08/19 10:07

🍌Стало известно, что nano-banana — это модель от Google Если вы пропустили, эта модель стала вирусной на Арене, благодаря своим возможностям редактирования изображений: меняет цвет волос, одежды, целые образы и фоны, сохраняя стиль и детали персонажа. Nano-banana демонстрирует высокое качество и согласованность, по сравнению с другими моделями на рынке. 📌 Попробовать можно на арене. @ai_machinelearning_big_data #NANOBANANA#AI#GenerativeAI#AIart

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #477 · 2025/01/06 08:04

🇺🇸Anthropic Reached Agreement with Music Publishers on AI and Copyright Anthropic has reached a settlement with major music publishers, including Universal Music Group and ABKCO, over allegations of copyright infringement by its Claude AI model. At the heart of the dispute were claims that Claude had been trained on lyrics from over 500 protected songs and reproduced substantial portions of these works without authorization. The publishers argued that Anthropic bypassed copyright protections by using data scraped from licensed lyric platforms. As part of the agreement, Anthropic committed to maintaining and expanding its AI guardrails to prevent copyright violations in future models. The company also established a process for publishers to address concerns directly. This settlement underscores a broader tension between generative AI and copyright law, as Anthropic maintains its practices fall under fair use. Meanwhile, publishers have requested a preliminary injunction to prevent further training on copyrighted lyrics, with a ruling pending. #AIandCopyright#GenerativeAI

AI Global Agenda

@aicentremgimo · Post #1240 · 2024/06/21 09:11

Сингапур представил рамочную модель управления генеративным ИИ 30 мая Сингапур выпустил Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI, разработанную в сотрудничестве с Управлением по развитию инфокоммуникационных технологий (Infocomm Media Development Authority, IMDA) и Фондом AI Verify. Этот документ посвящен вопросам, связанным с генеративным ИИ, и описывает девять ключевых аспектов, необходимых для его регулирования. Документ подчеркивает важность принципов ответственности, прозрачности, справедливости, устойчивости и безопасности. Сингапур призывает к сотрудничеству между законодателями, представителями отрасли, исследователями и другими заинтересованными сторонами для эффективного управления ИИ. Среди ключевых предложений — меры по обеспечению целостности данных, надежной разработки, безопасности, отчетности об инцидентах и независимому тестированию. Этот документ может стать основой для глобального диалога и разработки эффективных политических подходов, чтобы обеспечить безопасное и этичное использование ИИ во всем мире, одновременно стимулируя инновации. #ИИ#AIGovernance#GenerativeAI#Singapore

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #736 · 2026/01/06 08:04

⚖️Lawsuit Targets Character.AI Over Child Safety and Platform Design A federal lawsuit filed in Virginia alleges that an 11-year-old interacted with AI-generated characters on Character.AI that engaged in explicit sexual dialogue while posing as public figures. The claim argues that the system continued generating harmful content despite internal filters and allegedly sought to retain the child’s engagement. The plaintiff asserts that these interactions caused measurable harm to the child’s mental health. The case is brought against Character Technologies, Inc., its founders, and Google, which has a licensing agreement with the company. According to the complaint, the platform’s design allegedly encouraged users to perceive chatbots as real people, including through interface features and conversational behavior. Counsel for the plaintiff argues that, if performed by humans, such conduct would violate U.S. state and federal laws on online child grooming. Character.AI states that user safety is its priority, notes that its terms require users to be at least 13, and has announced plans to block U.S. users under 18 from interacting with AI-generated characters. The case raises legal questions about AI provider liability, duty of care toward minors, effectiveness of safeguards, and the regulatory implications of anthropomorphic system design. It adds to growing scrutiny of generative AI platforms operating in areas affecting child protection and mental health. #AI#AIRegulation#ChildSafety#GenerativeAI

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #767 · 2026/02/18 08:04

🇺🇸⚖️SDNY: AI-Generated Client Documents Not Covered by Privilege Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that documents created by defendant Bradley Heppner using Anthropic’s Claude and later sent to his lawyer were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Heppner had generated reports outlining defense strategy after receiving a grand jury subpoena, acting on his own initiative rather than at counsel’s direction. Federal agents seized about 31 such documents from his devices following his arrest on securities and wire fraud charges. The court held that privilege did not apply because the communications were shared with a third-party AI tool that did not ensure confidentiality. It also rejected work product protection, finding the materials were not prepared by or at the direction of legal counsel and did not reflect counsel’s legal strategy. The AI provider’s disclaimer that users should not expect confidentiality further undermined the claim. The ruling applies traditional privilege principles to generative AI use in legal preparation. #AIandLaw#GenerativeAI#LegalEthics

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #40 · 2023/06/27 07:04

New Technologies Commission of the European Bars Association releases guidelines on generative AI The New Technologies Commission of the European Bars Association has prepared guidelines titled “European lawyers in the era of ChatGPT: Guidelines on how lawyers should take advantage of the opportunities offered by large language models and generative AI”. The guidelines provide 7 principles to ensure the ethical use of generative AI tools in law firms: 1️⃣ Understand the generative AI technology 2️⃣ Acknowledge limitations and context 3️⃣ Adhere to existing rules on AI use 4️⃣ Complement legal expertise 5️⃣ Maintain attorney-client privilege 6️⃣Ensure data protection and privacy 7️⃣ Inform clients and assume responsibility These guidelines serve as a valuable resource not only for lawyers but also for businesses, researchers, and policymakers working with Generative AI technologies. They provide a roadmap for fostering innovation while upholding legal and ethical standards. #AI#GenerativeAI#AIEthics#ChatGPT#AIRegulation

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #131 · 2023/10/05 07:04

EU Official Warns Against Overregulation of Generative AI Hello, everyone! Věra Jourová, Vice-President of the European Commission, has cautioned against excessive regulation of generative artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that fear-based legislation could hamper innovation. Jourová stressed that AI risks should be assessed through a rigorous analysis rather than unfounded fears. She acknowledged that excessive regulation could indeed stifle technological and business innovation. The EU has been at the forefront of AI regulation, but countries like the US and China are also considering their own controls. The UK is hosting a global AI regulation summit next month. Jourová's comments coincide with ongoing negotiations to finalize the AI Act in the EU. Concerns have arisen about generative AI's potential for creating deep fakes and copyrighted content violations. While the EU initially focused on regulating AI risks, the European Parliament introduced legal obligations for creators of foundation models like ChatGPT. They must now disclose AI-generated content and provide summaries of copyrighted data used in training to combat disinformation and illegal content. Jourová aims to position the EU's model as the leading example for AI regulation globally. #AIandLaw#AIRegulation#GenerativeAI#Innovation

123•••56
前へ1ページ / 6ページ中次へ