Crypto Insider

JUST IN: Ledger eyes a New York IPO at a valuation above $4B, per the Financial Times. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

$LYN: token accumulation via fresh wallets Over the past 3 days, new buying activity in $LYN has been observed on DEXs from 10 newly created wallets. ➡️ Total purchases amount to roughly $600K ➡️ Buying activity is still ongoing ✅ Subscribe to @cryp

Someone created a new wallet and spent 1,505 $SOL($192K) to buy 1.55M $SURGE 14 hours ago. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

It was his last dollar. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

📉 HYPE remains under pressure Over the last 30 days, net spot selling exceeded $163M. Since the TGE anniversary on November 27, HYPE dropped from $39 to $20.4, the recent low. The reasons are straightforward. ➡️ First, there is no new season and communication from the team disappointed the market. On top of that, a meaningful part of the early unlocks was sold, which hit sentiment. ➡️ Second, the Tornado seller. This wallet accumulated HYPE around $8 to $9 and has been selling for about a month. Roughly 4.4M tokens are already sold, with 1.3M still left. The final unstake is expected on January 26. ➡️ Third, unmet expectations around Hyperliquid Strategies. The team had about $305M in cash, and holders expected aggressive market buybacks. That support never materialized. In November, this expectation was the main reason HYPE held above $40. Over the last 30 days, spot selling pressure included: ➡️ $74M from the Tornado seller ➡️ $15M from a large HYPE KOL (loracle) ➡️ $12.5M from the failed Trove ICO ➡️ $5.2M from the 20th largest airdrop recipient Against this, the Assistance fund bought back $40.3M of HYPE. What remains on the sell side: ➡️ 1.2M tokens from Continue Capital, average entry around $16 to $17 ➡️ 1.3M tokens from the Tornado seller Because of this pressure, HYPE traded below the Assistance fund’s average buy price of $23.6. At the recent low, the discount reached about 14%. At current levels, it is still around 7%. Some traders point to $17 as a possible downside, with liquidation clusters around $19. Daily demand of $1.5M to $2.5M looks solid in isolation. It stops working when single-day selling hits $43M on spot and $164M on futures. The market is in a disappointment phase, and the revenue narrative is cooling off. This phase will pass. Whether that happens after the Tornado seller finishes, or after renewed protocol buying begins, remains uncertain. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

JUST IN: FTX fraudster Caroline Ellison has been released from federal custody ✅Subscribe to@cryp

💸Bitcoin mining is no longer alpha After the halving, companies with no revenue outside of hashprice either moved sideways or fell 40–70%, while the winners were those selling AI compute, hosting, or capacity with stable, fixed demand. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

🥷This is just one of countless unethical ways money is made online This video shows a poker bot farm Multiple bots sit at the same table and share their cards in real time. Because they know each other’s cards, they never bluff or trap each other. They only bet aggressively when the human is statistically behind, and fold otherwise. A single bot farm like this can make more than the house. ✅Subscribe to@cryp

GM ✅Subscribe to@cryp

BREAKING: Trump says he will no longer be imposing 10% tariffs on EU countries on February 1st. Trump says he has “formed the framework for a future deal with respect to Greenland” with the Secretary General of NATO. ✅ Subscribe to @cryp

⭕️ Trump’s tariff playbook is back Tariffs under Trump follow a repeatable pattern. They are not primarily about trade economics. They are a tool for pressure, timing, and market psychology. What markets saw today fits that structure closely. How the tariff…

‼️ Permanent underclass is becoming the main political theme of early 2026 The idea of a permanent underclass is moving into the center of global discussion. What it means is fairly blunt. As cognitive and physical labor becomes fully automated, the ability of people to earn additional capital starts to disappear. This is not about the usual “95%”. It is closer to 99.99% of the population, excluding a handful of billionaires and a very small group inside top AI labs. Most people become economically obsolete, dependent, with limited agency and mobility. Power concentrates inside a technocratic oligarchy of roughly ten thousand people. This includes leaders of AI and robotics companies and the political leadership of the US and China. The group is far narrower than any oligopoly seen before. Where the discussion is moving: 🟡 Time pressure There is a growing belief that there may be, at best, a two year window to build capital that will support you for the rest of your life. 🟡 Emotional discipline Yes, if you work an office job, there is a real chance it will not exist in three to seven years. Panic and emotional collapse do not solve that problem. 🟡 Creation still matters As it becomes easier to create new things, robots build houses and models write code, opportunities for entrepreneurs actually expand. Routine work disappears, but the ability to build large businesses does not. 🟡 Regulation and UBI There is a strong belief that the state will step in and solve everything through redistribution and universal income. Many people believe in this. The probability of it working cleanly remains questionable. 🟡 The US strategy The US response looks rational from a power perspective. After securing AI dominance, it tries to lock in resources by force or leverage, Venezuela, Greenland, Ukrainian resources, anything strategically available, while tightening immigration and preparing for turbulence. 🟡 The “nothing happens” camp. Some argue that technology spreads slowly and economic systems are inert. This view is not insane, but it underestimates how fast nonlinear shifts can happen. 🟡 The open question. What do you do if any financially interesting business will eventually be automated by whoever has more GPUs? Focus on things that cannot be automated? Ignore moral constraints and extract value aggressively? Or exit the system entirely and retreat from civilization? None of these answers are comfortable. ‼️ And yes, trading can look like one of the few places where adaptability still pays. But discipline is not optional here. If there really is a two year window, it is also a two year window to start trading like a fucking professional and build a proper capital base. This is no longer a theoretical discussion. It is about positioning in a world where economic relevance is no longer guaranteed. ✅@trading