TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #242 · 7 мај

Теперь запакуем строку. В этом случае следует передавать тип данных bytes. >>> struct.pack('=s', b'a') b'a' Для записи слова следует указывать количество символов. >>> struct.pack('=5s', b'hello') b'hello' Кстати, запакованный вид соответствует исходному тексту. Всё верно, символ есть в таблице ASCII, то есть его код попадает в диапазон 0-127, он может быть записан одним байтом и имеет визуальное представление. А вот что будет если добавить символ вне ASCII >>> struct.pack(f'=s', b'ё') SyntaxError: bytes can only contain ASCII literal characters. Ошибка возникла еще на этапе создания объекта bytes, который не может содержать такой символ. Поэтому надо кодировать эти байты из строки. >>> enc = 'ёжик'.encode('utf-8') >>> struct.pack(f'={len(enc)}s', enc) b'\xd1\x91\xd0\xb6\xd0\xb8\xd0\xba' Заметьте, длина такой строки в байтах отличается от исходной длины, так как символы вне ASCII записываются двумя байтами и более. Поэтому здесь формат создаём на лету, используя получившуюся длину как каунтер токена. #libs#basic

Hashtags

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #executiveprivilege

当前筛选 #executiveprivilege清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5228 · 26.02.2026 г., 18:59

🕵️ Executive Privilege, Classified Gossip, and Congress Locked Out The Trump administration has drawn a curtain not just over the public, but over Congress itself. Tulsi Gabbard’s office has told Hill staff it will not share the full classified intelligence that triggered a whistleblower complaint against her, citing “the assertion of executive privilege to portions” of the material — even though the intel in question is an NSA report about a conversation between two foreign nationals discussing Jared Kushner. Democratic intel chiefs Mark Warner and Jim Himes say they can’t even confirm from the redacted version whether the intercepted discussion was about Kushner, because the complaint they finally received — eight months after it was filed and reportedly kept locked in a safe — is so heavily blacked out. The whistleblower accuses Gabbard of choking off distribution of the intelligence for political reasons and slowing its transmission to Congress; Gabbard denies wrongdoing and points to an inspector general who found the specific allegations about her “not credible,” while pointedly dodging the core transparency question. Executive privilege is almost never used to keep the Gang of Eight — the top bipartisan intel leaders — from seeing raw intelligence, especially when it’s about third‑country actors talking about a Trump relative, not about internal White House deliberations. Former NSA general counsel Glenn Gerstell calls that move “rare,” and other veterans say flatly it’s abnormal to smother a whistleblower case in secrecy while the same administration leaks just enough to declare the Kushner‑related claims “demonstrably false” without showing why. Republicans who control the intelligence committees have dismissed the whole affair as a manufactured Democratic smear and see no reason to push past the privilege wall, which leaves Democrats with theory and outrage but no leverage. On paper, Congress oversees the intelligence community; in practice, when a complaint touches Trump’s inner circle, the NSA cites national security, the DNI cites executive privilege, and the people supposedly in charge are told to be grateful for a redacted summary on a read‑and‑return basis. Call it the new security doctrine: surveillance for everyone, oversight for no one — especially if the intercepts stray too close to the family. #Gabbard#Kushner#whistleblower#executivePrivilege#NSA#Trump#Congress#USpolitics 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸