TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS
Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #309 · 2 фев.
Метод строки split() разделяет строку на несколько строк по указанному символу >>> "a_b_c".split('_') ['a', 'b', 'c'] Можно указать максимальное количество разделений >>> "a_b_c".split('_', 1) ['a', 'b_c'] Или резать с другой стороны с помощью rsplit() (right split) >>> "a_b_c".rsplit('_', 1) ['a_b', 'c'] А что будет если оставить аргументы пустыми? >>> "a_b_c".split() ['a_b_c'] Получаем список с одним элементом, потому что по умолчанию используется пробельный символ. >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] То есть это равнозначно такому вызову? >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', 'b', 'c'] Кажется да, но нет! Давайте попробуем добавить пробелов между буквами >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', '', '', 'b', '', '', 'c'] И вот картина уже не так предсказуема 😕 А вот что будет по умолчанию >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Всё снова красиво! 🤩 По умолчанию в качестве разделителя используется любой пробельный символ, будь то табуляция или новая строка. Включая несколько таких символов идущих подряд. А также игнорируются пробельные символы по краям строки. >>> "a\t b\n c ".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Аналогичный способ можно собрать с помощью регулярного выражения. Но пробелы по краям строки придется обрабатывать дополнительно. >>> import re >>> re.split(r"\s+", ' a b c '.strip()) ['a', 'b', 'c'] Здесь тоже можно указать количество разделений >>> re.split(r"\s+", 'a b c', 1) ['a', 'b c'] А что если мы хотим написать красиво, то есть split() без аргументов, но при этом указать количество разделений? В этом случае первым аргументом передаём None >>> "a\n b c".split(None, 1) ['a', 'b c'] Данный метод не учитывает строки с пробелами, взятые в кавычки 'a "b c" '.split() ['a', '"b', 'c"'] Но для таких случаев есть другие способы. #tricks#basic
Пребарај: #punctuation
@learnrcrussian · Post #4384 · 21.03.2025 г., 15:00
Был бы у меня такой кот, я, может, и не женился бы никогда. If I had a cat like that, I might never have gotten married. • Может [mo-zhyt] Maybe, perhaps, probably, might 🔻This introductory word expressing possibility or probability is set off by commas in a sentence. 😉С пятницей, товарищи! #just_a_joke #just_cats #punctuation #Friday 😎 Stay with @learnRCRussian
@languagetrivia · Post #490 · 16.12.2024 г., 09:47
Did you know that Spanish 🇪🇸 uses upside down exclamation and question marks (¡ and ¿) at the beginning of sentences? ¡Qué bonito! ("How beautiful!") ¿Cómo estás? ("How are you?") Creo que tienes razón, pero ¿estás completamente seguro? ("I think you're right, but are you completely sure?") Below you'll find a block of questions on these upside down punctuation marks. For each question react with 👍🏻 if you got it right and 🙈 if you got it wrong. @languagetrivia#question_block#punctuation
Hashtags
@languagetrivia · Post #463 · 10.12.2024 г., 19:02
In the world of printing and journalism, the exclamation mark (!) has earned a variety of colorful nicknames. One of these humorous terms compares its shape to a specific part of a dog’s anatomy. Sometimes an exclamation mark is humorously referred to as “a dog’s [what]"? A) Tail 🐕 B) Nose 👃 C) Bone 🦴 D) C*ck🍆 Take the quiz below to find out @languagetrivia#punctuation#symbol#slang
Hashtags
@languagetrivia · Post #596 · 16.01.2025 г., 10:16
✏️Did you know about the Oxford comma, also known as the serial comma? It's the final comma in a list of three or more items, placed before "and" or "or." For example: 🔵I invited my parents, Taylor Swift, and Elon Musk. Without the Oxford comma, it could look like this: 🔵I invited my parents, Taylor Swift and Elon Musk. Wait, are my parents Taylor Swift and Elon Musk?! 😅 Not everyone agrees on its usage: 🟢Proponents argue it provides clarity and prevents ambiguity 📝 🟣Opponents feel it’s unnecessary in straightforward cases and takes up space 📰 For instance, the AP Stylebook often skips it unless absolutely needed, but the Chicago Manual of Style recommends using it in all cases. Here are some examples showing how the Oxford comma can help fight ambiguity: 1️⃣Avoiding Misinterpretation: I dedicate this book to my parents, Mother Teresa, and the pope. Without the Oxford comma: I dedicate this book to my parents, Mother Teresa and the pope. This could imply that your parents are Mother Teresa and the pope. 😳 2️⃣Clarifying Groupings: We had coffee, cheese and crackers, and grapes. Without the Oxford comma: We had coffee, cheese and crackers and grapes. This could suggest that "crackers and grapes" are a combined dish. 🍇🧀 3️⃣Costly Consequences: O'Connor v. Oakhurst Dairy (2017) was a U.S. legal case where truck drivers sued for overtime pay, challenging an ambiguous Maine law that lacked an Oxford comma. The law exempted work involving "packing for shipment or distribution" of goods. Without a comma, it was unclear if "distribution" was part of "packing" or a separate activity. The court sided with the drivers, interpreting the ambiguity in their favor, leading to a $5 million payout. 💸 📌Ultimately, whether or not you use the Oxford comma is up to you, but the key is to be consistent. And it's also a good idea to use it in cases where it can help prevent ambiguity and misinterpretation! Sources: Grammarly |Wikipedia Tap ❤️ if you found this interesting @languagetrivia#grammar#punctuation#fact
Hashtags