@WorldNews · Post #74490 · 01.05.2026 г., 15:34
Iran threatens 'long and painful strikes' on U.S. targets if Trump resumes bombing [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#IranNews#USIranTensions#MiddleEastConflict
TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS
Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #309 · 2 фев.
Метод строки split() разделяет строку на несколько строк по указанному символу >>> "a_b_c".split('_') ['a', 'b', 'c'] Можно указать максимальное количество разделений >>> "a_b_c".split('_', 1) ['a', 'b_c'] Или резать с другой стороны с помощью rsplit() (right split) >>> "a_b_c".rsplit('_', 1) ['a_b', 'c'] А что будет если оставить аргументы пустыми? >>> "a_b_c".split() ['a_b_c'] Получаем список с одним элементом, потому что по умолчанию используется пробельный символ. >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] То есть это равнозначно такому вызову? >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', 'b', 'c'] Кажется да, но нет! Давайте попробуем добавить пробелов между буквами >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', '', '', 'b', '', '', 'c'] И вот картина уже не так предсказуема 😕 А вот что будет по умолчанию >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Всё снова красиво! 🤩 По умолчанию в качестве разделителя используется любой пробельный символ, будь то табуляция или новая строка. Включая несколько таких символов идущих подряд. А также игнорируются пробельные символы по краям строки. >>> "a\t b\n c ".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Аналогичный способ можно собрать с помощью регулярного выражения. Но пробелы по краям строки придется обрабатывать дополнительно. >>> import re >>> re.split(r"\s+", ' a b c '.strip()) ['a', 'b', 'c'] Здесь тоже можно указать количество разделений >>> re.split(r"\s+", 'a b c', 1) ['a', 'b c'] А что если мы хотим написать красиво, то есть split() без аргументов, но при этом указать количество разделений? В этом случае первым аргументом передаём None >>> "a\n b c".split(None, 1) ['a', 'b c'] Данный метод не учитывает строки с пробелами, взятые в кавычки 'a "b c" '.split() ['a', '"b', 'c"'] Но для таких случаев есть другие способы. #tricks#basic
Пребарај: #usirantensions
@WorldNews · Post #74490 · 01.05.2026 г., 15:34
Iran threatens 'long and painful strikes' on U.S. targets if Trump resumes bombing [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#IranNews#USIranTensions#MiddleEastConflict
@WorldNews · Post #73539 · 23.03.2026 г., 05:44
Treasury secretary defends U.S. military actions in Iran: 'Sometimes you have to escalate to de-escalate' [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#USIranTensions#MilitaryAction#GlobalSecurity
@WorldNews · Post #73664 · 28.03.2026 г., 03:34
US may deploy up to 17,000 troops near Iran as war enters new phase — WSJ [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#USIranTensions#MilitaryDeployment#WSJNews
@WorldNews · Post #73941 · 07.04.2026 г., 12:44
US strikes Iran’s main oil hub on Kharg Island as IRGC warns: 'Restraint is over' [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#USIranTensions#KhargIsland#OilMarkets2024
@CryptoM · Post #65411 · 13.04.2026 г., 05:59
🚀 Oil Prices Surge Above $105 Amid U.S.-Iran Tensions Oil prices have climbed above $105 following the breakdown of U.S.-Iran discussions in Islamabad, which has reignited concerns of potential conflict in global energy markets. According to NS3.AI, the Kobeissi Letter reported that Google search interest for 'price of oil' has reached an unprecedented level, surpassing the peaks of 2022 and 2008 by 300%. #OilPrices#USIranTensions#EnergyMarkets#GlobalEconomy#CrudeOil#MarketVolatility#OilCrisis
@CryptoM · Post #65224 · 12.04.2026 г., 04:24
🚀 U.S. President Trump Considers Maritime Blockade Against Iran On April 12, U.S. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about a potential maritime blockade against Iran. According to BlockBeats, Trump suggested this measure if Iran does not make concessions. The statement highlights ongoing tensions between the United States and Iran, with the possibility of escalating actions if diplomatic solutions are not reached. #Trump#Iran#MaritimeBlockade#USIranTensions#Diplomacy#TruthSocial#TrumpStatement#IranConcessions
@CryptoM · Post #65180 · 11.04.2026 г., 16:54
🚀 Bitcoin Market Divides Amid Ongoing U.S.-Iran Tensions The Bitcoin market is experiencing a notable division amid the ongoing U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions, which have persisted for approximately six weeks. According to ChainCatcher, the market is split between passive buyers, such as those involved with Strategy and spot ETFs, who continue to accumulate, and entities like whales, mining companies, and some sovereign holders, who are reducing their holdings. On the selling side, there is a clear trend: whale addresses holding between 1,000 and 10,000 BTC have shifted from net buying to significant net selling, with their holdings changing from an increase of about 200,000 BTC to a decrease of 188,000 BTC this year. Publicly listed mining companies, under pressure from high costs, have also been selling off, with weekly sales exceeding 19,000 BTC. Additionally, sovereign holders like Bhutan have reduced their Bitcoin reserves by approximately 70% since October 2024. Analysts note that despite market sentiment reaching extreme fear levels, Bitcoin's price has remained within the $65,000 to $73,000 range. This stability suggests that the price floor is primarily supported by a few institutional buyers. The current market's buying base is narrowing, and future trends will depend on whether institutional capital inflows can continue and break through key resistance levels. #Bitcoin#Cryptocurrency#BitcoinMarket#USIranTensions#CryptoTrading#BitcoinWhales#InstitutionalInvestors#BitcoinETFs#CryptoAnalysis#MarketTrends#BTC