TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #309 · 2 фев.

Метод строки split() разделяет строку на несколько строк по указанному символу >>> "a_b_c".split('_') ['a', 'b', 'c'] Можно указать максимальное количество разделений >>> "a_b_c".split('_', 1) ['a', 'b_c'] Или резать с другой стороны с помощью rsplit() (right split) >>> "a_b_c".rsplit('_', 1) ['a_b', 'c'] А что будет если оставить аргументы пустыми? >>> "a_b_c".split() ['a_b_c'] Получаем список с одним элементом, потому что по умолчанию используется пробельный символ. >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] То есть это равнозначно такому вызову? >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', 'b', 'c'] Кажется да, но нет! Давайте попробуем добавить пробелов между буквами >>> "a b c".split(" ") ['a', '', '', 'b', '', '', 'c'] И вот картина уже не так предсказуема 😕 А вот что будет по умолчанию >>> "a b c".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Всё снова красиво! 🤩 По умолчанию в качестве разделителя используется любой пробельный символ, будь то табуляция или новая строка. Включая несколько таких символов идущих подряд. А также игнорируются пробельные символы по краям строки. >>> "a\t b\n c ".split() ['a', 'b', 'c'] Аналогичный способ можно собрать с помощью регулярного выражения. Но пробелы по краям строки придется обрабатывать дополнительно. >>> import re >>> re.split(r"\s+", ' a b c '.strip()) ['a', 'b', 'c'] Здесь тоже можно указать количество разделений >>> re.split(r"\s+", 'a b c', 1) ['a', 'b c'] А что если мы хотим написать красиво, то есть split() без аргументов, но при этом указать количество разделений? В этом случае первым аргументом передаём None >>> "a\n b c".split(None, 1) ['a', 'b c'] Данный метод не учитывает строки с пробелами, взятые в кавычки 'a "b c" '.split() ['a', '"b', 'c"'] Но для таких случаев есть другие способы. #tricks#basic

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #westerndemocracy

当前筛选 #westerndemocracy清除筛选
New Eastern Outlook

@neweasternoutlook · Post #12120 · 08.02.2026 г., 10:00

🇺🇸🏴‍☠️Minnesota Crisis: A Mirror of American Politics Clashes in Minnesota have become more than a local dispute, reflecting deep fractures that could intensify as the United States approaches the November elections Mohammed Amer is a Syrian publicist. ➡️Throughout January 2026, national attention focused on unrest in Minnesota, where protests against immigration enforcement operations escalated into confrontations involving state authorities and federal forces. The deaths of two civilians and multiple injuries intensified scrutiny of the administration’s handling of immigration policy and public order. Democratic lawmakers and major media outlets demanded investigations, while some Republicans also called for federal–state inquiries, underscoring the political sensitivity of the crisis. Editorial commentary framed the events as emblematic of broader tensions over executive authority, civil liberties, and the use of force. What began as a dispute over deportation practices quickly evolved into a symbolic battleground in a polarized national debate. America’s foreign policy elite has transformed from a group of prim bureaucratic structures into a royal family ➡️The Minnesota episode has unfolded alongside fiscal brinkmanship in Washington, where budget disputes threaten another government shutdown. Senate Democrats signaled resistance to supporting key funding measures, increasing pressure on the administration as public approval fluctuates. At the same time, criticism of President Trump’s leadership style—ranging from policy inconsistency to concerns about temperament—has intensified in domestic and international media. Supporters argue that tougher enforcement and assertive tactics reflect electoral mandates; opponents counter that confrontational governance risks inflaming divisions. The political climate has grown so charged that even speculative discussions about electoral stability and institutional resilience have entered mainstream commentary. 🟦As the November congressional elections approach, Minnesota stands as a microcosm of America’s widening polarization. Protests, partisan media narratives, and mutual accusations between political camps reveal a society struggling to reconcile competing visions of national identity and authority. Some analysts warn that escalating rhetoric could harden positions further, while others believe institutional checks and electoral processes remain robust enough to absorb the strain. Whether the unrest marks a temporary flashpoint or a deeper turning point will depend on the capacity of political leaders to de-escalate tensions and restore public trust. For now, Minnesota reflects a broader question confronting the United States: how to manage profound internal disagreement without allowing it to fracture the democratic framework itself. #CivilWar#Elections#Internalpolicy#poliyicalcrisis#USA#WesternDemocracy#Weterncrisis READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook