Најди сличен содржај

🚨🇺🇸TRUMP ECONOMIC REPORT DROPS — OBBBA ACT RESULTS REVEALED 🔹$4000 real wage boost projected for workers after 4 years of OBBBA Tax Cuts — biggest in US history 💰 🔹Trade deficit down 24% since Liberation Day April 2025 — 32% drop with China, 40% with EU 📉 🔹2.5% extra GDP growth from tax reforms, doubled Child Tax Credit helping American families 📊 🔹Private sector jobs dominate vs 25% public under prior admin — real manufacturing comeback 🏭 🔹Federal deficit cut $362 billion in 2025 versus 2024 — fiscal responsibility returns 📋 America First policies are WORKING — wages up, deficits down, trade wins everywhere! 🇺🇸⚡ #USNews#Trump2026 @america

https://x.com/jackdangerlive/status/2053909140435841472?s=52 🇺🇸🚨 AMERICA WAS JUST REBORN IN THE OVAL OFFICE! 🚨🇺🇸 President Trump just looked straight into the soul of the nation and declared with fire in his eyes: “Listen very carefully… Our country was stolen in 1913… and WE HAVE TAKEN IT BACK!” The Federal Reserve scam. The unconstitutional income tax. 113 years of banker control, deep state tyranny, and stolen sovereignty from We the People. IT ENDS NOW. This is the Republic our Founding Fathers fought and died for, restored. This is Liberty rising again. This is the American Dream reclaimed under God. The greatest comeback in history is happening RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES. Who’s ready to Make America GREAT Again, greater than EVER before? Type “1776” if your blood is running red, white, and blue! 🔥 RT & share everywhere, let the world know: America belongs to Americans once more! 🇺🇸🦅 #Trump2026#TakeItBack#1913WasTheTheft

📰 Israeli strikes kill 26 in Gaza, health officials say The Israeli military carried out its heaviest airstrikes in Gaza in weeks on Saturday, killing at least 26 people, including several children and women, according to local health authorities. The strikes hit a Hamas-run police station west of Gaza City, killing 10 officers and detainees, and also struck a residential apartment and a tent camp for displaced Palestinians in and around Khan Younis. “What did those children do?” At an apartment in Gaza City, three children and two women were killed, hospital officials said. Video from the scene showed a blackened building, shattered walls, and debris scattered in the street. “We found my three little nieces in the street,” a relative, Samer al-Atbash, told Reuters. “They say ‘ceasefire’ and all. What did those children do? What did we do?” Hundreds of other Palestinians remain trapped in homes, hospitals, and tent camps in Gaza, where the health system is barely functioning and rescue teams struggle to keep up with the dead and wounded. Ceasefire under fire The Israeli military said the strikes were a response to eight gunmen emerging from a tunnel in Rafah on Friday, where Israeli forces are still deployed under the current truce deal. Hamas did not comment on the tunnel incident, but it insisted Israel is the one violating the ceasefire. Since the U.S.-brokered truce took effect in October, at least 10 Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza, according to Israeli officials, while Israeli operations have killed more than 500 Palestinians in the Strip, most of them civilians, according to Gaza health officials. The road forward The two sides now trade blame for ceasefire violations while Washington pushes them toward the next, far more difficult phase of the truce: Hamas disarmament, further Israeli troop withdrawals, and a potential international peacekeeping force in Gaza. Gaza’s main lifeline, the Rafah crossing with Egypt, is expected to reopen Sunday, potentially allowing more wounded civilians to evacuate and some humanitarian supplies to enter. For now, though, the truce is measured in broken bodies and new mass graves, not in maps or peace handshakes. #Israel#Gaza#Ceasefire#Hamas#War#Trump2026 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Iran Renews Threat to Strike Israel as US Attack Fears Grow Iran’s top military chief has issued a new warning to the U.S. and Israel: “If the enemy makes a mistake, it will without doubt endanger its own security, the security of the region, and the security of the Zionist regime.” Speaking at a ceremony in Tehran, Army Chief Major General Amir Hatami said Iranian forces are fully ready for combat, and added that “our finger is on the trigger” as they closely watch hostile moves across the region, according to the state-run IRNA. A “proportionate, effective, and deterrent response” Just a day earlier, Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, told the Beirut-based Al Mayadeen that Tehran is prepared to respond to “hostile intent” with a “proportionate, effective, and deterrent” military strike — including deep inside Israel if needed. Iran’s leadership is now sending a clear message: the U.S. may be building up its military in the Gulf and threatening attacks, but Tehran is not begging for mercy — it’s preparing for war. Cities preparing for the worst Iranian officials are openly talking about wartime preparations: Tehran’s mayor has announced that the capital is converting underground parking lots into bomb shelters, while state media reports that a burial site with thousands of graves has been prepared near the city’s main cemetery, for the “temporary burial of potential casualties” from an invading U.S. force. These aren’t just abstract threats. The country is telling its people that the next escalation with the U.S. could mean mass graves, curfews, and air raids — and it’s framing the conflict as a frontal challenge to American dominance. “Fair and equitable nuclear deal,” but no surrender At the same time, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says Tehran is ready to “embrace a fair and equitable nuclear deal” that would ensure “No Nuclear Weapons” and guarantee the lifting of sanctions. But behind the diplomatic language is a hard line: Iran will not hand over its nuclear or missile capabilities, and will treat any U.S. military strike as an all‑out war. Trump’s armada, and Tehran’s reckoning The showdown comes as President Donald Trump has ordered a large U.S. military buildup in the Middle East, including a naval “Armada” he says is ready to strike Iran with “speed and violence” if it doesn’t comply. To Iran’s hard‑liners, this is not a bargaining signal; it’s a prelude to annihilation. The logic is simple: if the U.S. strikes, Iran will strike back against Israel and regional U.S. bases, and the region will burn whether Washington is ready or not. Because in Tehran, the real question is no longer “How do we avoid a deal?” It’s: “How fast do we want the war to begin?” #Iran#US#Israel#Trump2026#MiddleEast#War#Nuclear#Diplomacy 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Trump confirms speaking to Iran, says he plans to again; hopes US won’t have to take military action President Donald Trump reiterated his warning to Iran on Wednesday, saying the U.S. has “a lot of very big, very powerful ships” sailing toward the region and that “it would be great if we didn’t have to use them.” Trump confirmed that he has already been in contact with Iran in recent days and told reporters he is planning to speak to Tehran again, holding out the threat of military action if negotiations fail. The remarks come amid escalating U.S. military build‑up in the Middle East, as Trump’s administration weighs possible strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, and as the U.S. pushes its Gaza ceasefire plan into the thornier phases of the deal. Trump framed the show of force as a way to pressure Iran into talking, not just a prelude to war: “We would much rather negotiate. It would be great if we didn’t have to use” those “big, powerful ships.” Yet, the pattern remains familiar: diplomacy dressed in the language of destruction, with the U.S. arguing that only the credible threat of pulverizing punches can open the door to a deal. The next question is not who’s bluffing — but which side will blink first, and how many cities are ready to burn if neither does. #Trump2026#Iran#US#MiddleEast#Gaza#Ceasefire#Military#Diplomacy 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Trump Reverts to Diplomacy With Iran, but the Road Is Narrow Even with President Donald Trump’s “beautiful armada” hovering near its shores, Iran is doing what it does best: turning nuclear diplomacy into a test of American nerves. Talks in Oman on Friday did not end in insults or missile strikes. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called it a “good start,” promising a “framework” for “future talks” — a phrase that sounds hopeful in Arabic but reads like a delaying tactic in Washington. Trump also declared the opening round a success, saying he is in “no rush” to strike a deal, as long as Iran agrees to “no nuclear weapons.” The problem is that everyone already pretends to agree on that, while the real fight hides behind the words: zero enrichment, missiles that cannot reach Israel, and an end to Iran’s network of regional proxies. Iran’s game: time, weakness, and the fear of war Iran has long mastered the art of stretching negotiations while rebuilding its military and remaking its image. Today, the regime is weaker than it has been in decades — battered by a 12‑day war with Israel and the U.S., and hollowed out by the bloody suppression of mass protests. Yet Tehran insists that nothing has changed. It still claims the right to enrich uranium and refuses to put its ballistic missiles on the table, even as the Abraham Lincoln carrier group floats in striking distance of its coastline. Analysts in London and Washington say Iran is gambling that Trump wants a headline‑winning deal, not a long, bloody regional war. The U.S. military buildup is meant to pressure Iran into concessions, while also buying time to prepare for the war that everyone hopes will not come. But the question is: who is more patient? Trump’s bottom line — and the illusion of surrender Trump’s stated conditions are clear: hand over Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, slash the range of its missiles, and cut support for Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. To the Iranian leadership, that is not a negotiation; it is a demand for capitulation without defeat. On enrichment, the regime is refusing to stop entirely but may be willing to cap it at 3 percent — a return, roughly, to the 2015 deal Trump once called “the worst in history.” A return to that structure, however, would be a political trap for Trump. Too close to the old deal to be sold as a victory, yet too limited in scope to satisfy Israeli and Gulf allies, it risks looking like a retreat disguised as a win. The nuclear shadow over any war Behind the diplomatic theatrics is a darker logic: even if the U.S. somehow “decapitates” the Iranian regime, killing Khamenei and blowing up Revolutionary Guard bases, democracy is not waiting in the wings. Analysts warn that a more hard‑line military‑Islamic government could emerge, even more committed to racing for a nuclear deterrent. That makes every strike a potential catalyst for the one outcome Washington claims to want to avoid. The narrow road ahead Diplomacy, then, is not the West’s sign of strength but of restraint — and of fear. The U.S. wants a deal that it can sell as “peace with honor,” while Iran wants to keep its weapons, its missiles, and its regional influence intact. The road between these two positions is not long; it is narrow. One misstep, one miscalculation, one Trump tirade or Iranian provocation, and the “good start” in Oman could become another chapter in the same old war drama — this time with nuclear weapons on the table. #Trump2026#Iran#US#Diplomacy#Nuclear#Oman#Israel#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Israel warns Trump: We may act alone if Iran crosses ballistic missile red line Senior Israeli defense officials have informed Washington that Iran’s ballistic‑missile program remains an existential threat — and that Jerusalem is prepared to strike Iran unilaterally if the Islamic Republic crosses the red line Israel has set. “We told the Americans we will strike alone if Iran crosses the red line we set on ballistic missiles,” a security source said, noting that Israel is not yet at that threshold but is closely monitoring developments inside Iran. The message is clear: any U.S. hesitation will not stop Israel from acting. A “historic opportunity” to degrade Iran’s missile arsenal Military officials say they have presented to the U.S. operational plans aimed at degrading Iran’s missile infrastructure, including strikes on key manufacturing and launch facilities. One senior defense official described the current moment as a “historic opportunity” to deliver a significant blow to Iran’s missile program and neutralize active threats to Israel and its neighbors. The intent is to dismantle Iran’s ability to rebuild a missile force that can credibly threaten Israel’s existence, not just knock out a few launchers, call it a day, and pretend the problem is solved. Israeli officials insist that any meaningful strike must be deep, persistent, and coordinated with Israel’s own requirements — not with Washington’s political calendar. Fears of a Trump‑style limited strike Behind the scenes, Israeli officials worry that President Donald Trump may favor a “limited strike” model similar to recent U.S. operations against the Houthis in Yemen — a few targets, a quick victory declaration, and an exit that leaves the underlying threat largely intact. “The worry is he might choose a few targets, declare success, and leave Israel to deal with the fallout, just like with the Houthis,” a military official said. This scenario is especially troubling for Israel, which expects to bear the direct consequences if Iran continues to rebuild its missile capabilities after a cosmetic U.S. strike. Israeli planners insist that any meaningful strike must be deep, persistent, and coordinated with Israel’s own requirements — not just with Washington’s political calendar. The visible face of the warning: Tishler, Zamir, and the embassy gap The seriousness of the warning is reflected in Israel’s diplomatic‑military lineup. Brigadier‑General Omer Tishler, Israel’s incoming air force commander, is expected to join Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his upcoming trip to Washington. Tishler will represent IDF Chief of Staff Lt.‑Gen. Eyal Zamir, since there is currently no Israeli defense attaché in Washington — a post Defense Minister Israel Katz has effectively blocked. That vacuum only heightens the sense that Israel is relying on direct, high‑level communication with Trump’s inner circle, not on the usual bureaucratic channels. Jerusalem is signaling that if the U.S. retreats into a limited‑strike playbook, the IDF is prepared to act on its own — and that Trump will not be able to spin it as “joint action.” The unspoken line: who owns the red line? Israel’s missile‑red‑line language is a warning not just to Tehran, but also to Washington: the clock is running, and the decision to cross it will be made in Jerusalem, not Washington. The question is no longer “Should Israel strike Iran?” It is: “How many times will the U.S. give Israel a ‘historic opportunity’ before Israel finally decides to take it?” #Israel#Iran#BallisticMissiles#Trump2026#Netanyahu#US#Diplomacy#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Explosions in Iran Spread Jitters Amid Anticipation of Foreign Attacks Deadly explosions in several Iranian cities, most likely caused by domestic accidents, have sent a wave of panic through a country already on the edge, fearing U.S. and Israeli strikes. In Bandar Abbas, a major port in southern Iran, a powerful blast ripped through an eight‑story residential building, killing at least one person (a 4‑year‑old girl) and injuring more than a dozen others, according to local officials and Iranian state media. The local fire chief said the incident was probably caused by a gas leak and buildup, and the government’s crisis management body stressed that the explosion had no security or sabotage origin. But as images of a crumbled building and shattered streets spread online, wild rumors took over social media: claims that the blast had assassinated Iran’s top naval commander, Commodore Alireza Tangsiri, and that Israel or the U.S. was behind the explosion. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards swiftly denied those reports, calling them “psychological warfare” and disinformation, while Israel and the U.S. issued no public comment on the incident. The real detonator: Trump’s threats The explosion in Bandar Abbas came just days after President Donald Trump declared that a “massive Armada” was heading toward Iran and warned that the U.S. was ready to strike with “speed and violence.” In June 2025, the U.S. had already struck three of Iran’s main nuclear sites in a 12‑day conflict with Israel, dealing a serious blow to Tehran’s nuclear program. Iran now demands that the U.S. renew talks only if the threats stop. Against that backdrop, a gas leak in an apartment building does not feel like a gas leak. It feels like the first crack in the ground before the bomb goes off. Other blasts, same panic In the same 24 hours, Iranian state media reported another deadly gas explosion in the south‑western city of Ahvaz, which killed five people but was officially described as a domestic accident, not sabotage. Unverified reports and footage of smoke and explosions in the north‑western city of Tabriz also circulated, only to be quickly dismissed by local authorities as rumors and a minor reed fire. None of the recent incidents so far show any sign of foreign attack. But the sheer number of explosions, and the speed at which people jump to “Israel” or “the U.S.” as the culprit, reveals a deeper truth: the theater is already in people’s heads. “Society is waiting for war” “When the next blast happens, we won’t need to wait for the government to explain the cause,” said a 43‑year‑old engineer in Tehran, who asked not to be named out of fear of reprisal. “Everyone around me is waiting for possible U.S. and Israeli military action,” he said. “People are stressed, anxious, powerless. We don’t know what was behind today’s explosions. Maybe it’s internal retaliation, maybe foreign sabotage, maybe just a gas leak. But one thing is undeniable: Society is waiting for war.” #Iran#Trump2026#US#Israel#MiddleEast#War#GasLeak#BandarAbbas 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Trump calls for ‘modernized’ nuclear treaty after New START expires President Donald Trump has let the New START nuclear‑arms treaty with Russia lapse, confirming in a social‑media post that he will not extend the deal and instead wants experts to craft a new “modernized” agreement. New START, signed in 2010, placed the last major limits on the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, capping each side at 1,550 deployed strategic warheads and 700 deployed launchers. With its expiration on February 5, there is now no formal nuclear‑arms‑control pact between the world’s two largest nuclear powers for the first time in over half a century. The Trump doctrine: “New, improved, and modernized” Trump dismissed New START as “a badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated.” In his Truth Social post, he argued that the U.S. should instead design a new treaty that includes China, whose nuclear arsenal is growing rapidly, and better reflects the strategic realities of the 2020s. He did not say whether formal talks with Russia have already begun. The White House has refused to confirm reports that U.S. and Russian officials drafted a plan in Abu Dhabi to keep observing New START limits for at least six months while negotiating a successor deal. The Democratic and arms‑control backlash Democratic lawmakers and arms‑control advocates had urged the administration to at least keep observing the treaty’s limits while talks continued. Rep. John Garamendi of California said New START’s expiration had thrown the world into a “terrifying new era,” with no constraints on the nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia. “History has already shown us where that road leads,” he warned. The strange dance of deterrence and dialogue Even as the treaty lapsed, the U.S. and Russia quietly agreed to reestablish high‑level military‑to‑military contact, their first such channel in over four years. The communication line was restored after a meeting in Abu Dhabi between Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, head of U.S. European Command and NATO’s top general in Europe, and senior Russian and Ukrainian military officials. That hotline is meant to reduce the risk of miscalculation and escalation, at a time when Russia is again pounding Ukraine’s energy grid — despite Trump’s earlier public appeal to Putin to halt strikes on Kyiv and other cities. So now the world has a paradoxical arrangement: no formal nuclear‑arms‑control treaty, but a renewed hotline between the world’s two biggest nuclear powers, and a president who wants a “modernized” deal — once the world is already on the edge again. Because the real question is not whether Trump can design a better treaty. It’s whether he is ready to live in a world where the guards are gone and the bombs are bigger. #Trump2026#NewSTART#Nuclear#Russia#US#ArmsControl#Diplomacy#Ukraine 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 US approves major new arms sales to Israel worth $6.67 billion and to Saudi Arabia worth $9 billion The Trump administration has approved a massive new wave of arms sales: $6.67 billion to Israel and $9 billion to Saudi Arabia, announced as tensions rise in the Middle East over the possibility of U.S. military strikes on Iran. The State Department described the Saudi sale as 730 Patriot missiles and related gear, meant to “improve the security of a Major non‑NATO Ally” and boost its role in the region’s integrated air and missile defense system. For Israel, the $6.67 billion is split into four packages. The biggest chunk, $3.8 billion, is for 30 Apache attack helicopters equipped with rocket launchers and advanced targeting systems. The next largest, $1.98 billion, goes to 3,250 light tactical vehicles, used to move personnel and equipment deeper into the battlefield. Another $740 million is for power packs for armored personnel carriers, and the remaining $150 million is for a small number of light utility helicopters to complement existing fleets. The State Department insists that none of these deals will upset the regional military balance, and that all of them simply “enhance Israel’s capability to meet current and future threats” by strengthening its borders, infrastructure, and population centers. Israel “will spend” the money — the U.S. is not handing it cash — and the sales are framed as part of the U.S. commitment to help Israel maintain a “strong and ready self‑defense capability,” vital to American national interests. Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, accused the Trump administration of rushing the Israel deals in a way that “disregards Congressional oversight and years of standing practice.” He said the administration has “blatantly ignored long‑standing Congressional prerogatives” and refused to engage Congress on key questions about the next phases of the Gaza ceasefire and broader U.S.‑Israel policy. The sales come as Trump’s Gaza ceasefire plan is entering its most difficult phase: disarming Hamas, deploying an international security force, and rebuilding a devastated territory after two years of war. Yet, at the same moment, the U.S. is approving billions of dollars in heavy offensive weapons for Israel and a huge new Patriot stockpile for Saudi Arabia, while also warning Iran of further strikes if it reconstitutes its nuclear program. The message is clear: peace is on the menu, but the real money is still on firepower. #Trump2026#USArmsSales#Israel#SaudiArabia#Gaza#Ceasefire#Iran#Defense#Congress 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Sets Date to Meet in Washington, Officials Say President Donald Trump’s new “Board of Peace” is scheduled to hold its inaugural meeting in Washington on February 19, according to U.S. and board officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The group, whose charter was signed last month at the World Economic Forum in Davos, has been framed as a vehicle to end the war in Gaza and oversee reconstruction there. But its ambitions stretch further: critics see it as Trump’s attempt to build a rival to the United Nations, chaired by the president himself and governed through a mix of bilateral relationships and dollar diplomacy. The Washington meeting: Gaza as the price of entry The February 19 summit will be held at the U.S. Institute of Peace — now rebranded in Trump’s honor — and is expected to function as both a leaders’ forum and a fundraising conference for the reconstruction of Gaza, which lies in ruins after two years of war. The Board of Peace charter grants Trump a veto‑like role as chairman and requires prospective permanent members to contribute $1 billion to the fund. More than 20 countries have joined so far, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, Hungary, Indonesia and Pakistan. Yet France and several other European allies have stayed away, wary that the board is designed to bypass or weaken the UN. Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary has publicly confirmed he will attend. “Two weeks from now we will meet again in Washington,” he told supporters, “because the Board of Peace, the peace body, will hold its inaugural meeting.” From Gaza to a global order project The board’s formal mandate was born of Trump’s 20‑point plan to end the Israel–Hamas war, which was later endorsed by the UN Security Council. The resolution gives the Board of Peace authority to oversee the implementation of the ceasefire, the disarmament of Hamas, and the governance and reconstruction of Gaza for a transitional period. But the charter’s language is deliberately broad, calling for the board to “secure enduring peace in areas affected or threatened by conflict,” and to create a “more nimble and effective international peace‑building body.” That wording is a clear signal: while Gaza may be the pilot project, the real goal is to reshape the international order in a way that keeps Washington and Trump at the center. The meta‑game: legitimacy, money, and power The February 19 meeting is less about consensus than about demonstration. It will show which capitals are willing to pay $1 billion for a seat at a Trump‑run table, and which prefer to keep their distance from a project that others see as “a UN‑Lite” ruled by personality and bilateral leverage. For Israel, the board is a double‑edged tool. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accepted Trump’s invitation to join the group, even though he skipped the Davos signing ceremony and initially balked at the inclusion of Qatar and Turkey. He is expected in Washington the same week, overlapping with the Board of Peace meeting, and may be forced to nod along while quietly pushing back on the extent of U.S. control over Gaza. The question the board will not answer The Board of Peace is born of crisis, but it is not a crisis‑solver; it is a crisis‑manager with better branding. Its real mission is to give one man in Washington, and a small circle of funders and allies, the power to say which conflicts “count,” which ceasefires “stick,” and where the money flows. The question is not whether the board can rebuild Gaza. It is whether the world will accept the premise that peace, like everything else, can be structured as a deal with a built‑in Trump veto. #Trump2026#BoardOfPeace#Gaza#UN#Diplomacy#Washington#Netanyahu#Orban#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Israel estimates slim prospects for US‑Iran agreement in Oman talks The United States and Iran are set to hold high‑stakes talks in Oman on Friday, but Israel’s government is already treating the meeting as a feeler, not a breakthrough. U.S. President Donald Trump framed the talks as pure power politics, saying Iran is negotiating now because “they don’t want us to hit them.” He repeated that line several times this week, pointing to a “big fleet” moving toward Iran as the backdrop to the diplomacy. The narrow scope — and the wide gaps Iran has agreed to send Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to Muscat, but insists the talks should focus only on the nuclear issue. The U.S. insists on a broader agenda that includes Iran’s nuclear program, the range and use of its ballistic missiles, its support for proxy forces, and the treatment of its own population. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said the Islamic Republic is entering the talks “with authority and with the aim of reaching a fair, mutually acceptable and dignified understanding on the nuclear issue.” He urged the U.S. to approach the process “with responsibility, realism and seriousness” — a polite way of saying: “Don’t try to turn this into a regime‑change package.” The Muslim‑country framework — and why it might not matter Several Muslim states, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Pakistan, have pushed for a broader non‑aggression pact between the U.S. and Iran, under which neither side would target the other or their allies and proxies. They also proposed a framework that would limit Iran’s uranium enrichment to 1–3 percent, ship out its higher‑enriched stockpile, and curb its missile and proxy‑weapon exports. Initially, the U.S. had floated holding the talks in Turkey with these six countries present. Iran rejected that plan, and the U.S. agreed to move to Oman, with only Washington and Tehran at the table. That means it is now unclear whether the Muslim‑country framework will even be discussed, though the diplomats say they are still trying to keep it in the conversation. Why Israel expects failure — and what it would mean Kan public broadcaster, citing an unnamed Israeli source familiar with the matter, reported that Israel believes the Friday talks are essentially doomed. In Jerusalem’s view, the gaps are simply too wide. The U.S. wants “zero nuclear capability” and to drastically reduce Iran’s missile range so warheads cannot reach Israel, while Iran wants to keep its nuclear enrichment and missile programs intact, even if it tweaks the numbers. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president is “waiting to see what comes” of the talks but made clear that Trump is open to a deal that eliminates Iran’s nuclear program. At the same time, she reminded Tehran that “the president has many options at his disposal — aside from diplomacy — as the commander in chief of the most powerful military in the history of the world.” The real question: will Iran give up its missiles? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that any meaningful deal must include Iran’s ballistic missiles, nuclear program, terrorism sponsorship, and domestic repression. Iran has refused to put missiles on the table, and is only willing to talk about the nuclear file — and not on the U.S. terms. That leaves Tel Aviv with a grim but clear calculus. If these talks freeze the nuclear program but leave Iran’s missile and proxy armies intact, Israel will treat the war zone as still open — and respond with “a force the likes of which has never been seen” if attacked. Because in Jerusalem, the real question is not “Can Trump and Iran sign a deal?” It’s: “Can Iran walk away with a deterrent that still points at Israel?” And everything suggests the answer is: yes, unless Trump is ready to strike. #USIran#OmanTalks#Nuclear#Iran#Israel#Trump2026#Diplomacy#Missiles#MiddleEast 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸