TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #396 · 9 окт.

7.09.2025 состоялся релизPithon 3.14! На фоне хайпа про NoGIL всё позабыли про другие фичи. Особенно про Multiple Interpreters, который обещает изоляцию процессов но с эффективностью потоков! На сколько действительно это будет эффективно мы узнаем позже, потому что сейчас это лишь первый релиз с ограничениями и недоработками. Но что там про NoGIL? Теперь этот режим не экспериментальный, а официально поддерживаемый, но опциональный. Чтобы запустить без GIL нужна специальная сборка. И перед стартом нужно объявить переменную PYTHON_GIL=0 Для вас я собрал готовый репозиторий где достаточно запустить скрпит, который всё сделает: ▫️ соберет релизный Python 3.14 в новый Docker-образ ▫️ запустит тесты в контейнере (GIL, NoGIL, MultiInterpreter) ▫️ распечатает результаты Тест очень простой, усложняйте сами) Вот какие результаты у меня: === Running ThreadPoolExecutor GIL ON TOTAL TIME: 45.48 seconds === Running ThreadPoolExecutor GIL OFF TOTAL TIME: 6.14 seconds === Running basic Thread GIL ON TOTAL TIME: 45.54 seconds === Running basic Thread GIL OFF TOTAL TIME: 4.74 seconds === Running with Multi Interpreter TOTAL TIME: 18.30 seconds Если сравнивать GIL и NoGIL, то на мои 32 ядра прирост х7-x10 (почему не х32? 🤷). При этом нам обещают что скорости будут расти с новыми релизами. Режим без GIL похож (визуально) на async, тоже параллельно, тоже не по порядку. Но это не IO! и от того некоторый диссонанс в голове 😵‍💫, нас учили не так! Интересно, что чистый Thread работает быстрей чем ThreadPoolExecutor без GIL. Ну и где-то плачет один адепт мульти-интерпретаторов😭 Теперь нужно искать где они могут пригодиться с такой-то скоростью. Скорее всего своя область применения найдется. Отдельно я затестил память и вот что вышло на 32 потока: ThreadPoolExecutor GIL ON 305.228 MB ThreadPoolExecutor GIL OFF 500.176 MB basic Thread GIL ON 90.668 MB basic Thread GIL OFF 472.444 MB with Multi Interpreter 1267.788 MB Пока не знаю как к этому относиться) В целом - радует направление развития! #release

Hashtags

Резултати

Пронајдени 3 слични објави

Пребарај: #electionintegrity

当前筛选 #electionintegrity清除筛选
Wendy Rogers

@wendyrogersaz · Post #9318 · 05.02.2026 г., 20:32

Honored to sponsor the SB 1425 mirror bill equivalent, which will move Arizona’s primary up to 21 July and stipulates mandatory observers during the primary in all counties among other fixes. Full bipartisan support. #ElectionIntegrity

DavidNinoRodriguez

@ninoscorner · Post #19472 · 17.03.2026 г., 02:30

“Doc” Pete Chambers posted: BREAKING - NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE*** 66,146 GOP ballots DELETED during TX early voting. 87,336 voters appeared, disappeared, reappeared in state records. The Cornyn-Paxton margin is only 26K. Someone inside the system is picking our nominees. Don’t certify. Audit no, this is too big not to notice. Complacency will end our Constitutional Republic! WHAT HAPPENED? Your vote disappeared. During early voting, thousands of Texas ballots vanished from official state records—then reappeared—then vanished again. In BOTH parties. The data proves someone inside the system is manipulating who wins. We need answers before November. THE PROBLEM IN SIMPLE NUMBERS: REPUBLICAN PRIMARY: •87,336 voters appeared, disappeared, then reappeared in state records •66,146 ballots completely deleted from final count •35,772 extra ballots added to people who already voted •Only 26,000 votes separate Cornyn and Paxton—but 66,000 ballots disappeared DEMOCRAT PRIMARY: •37,039 voters appeared, disappeared, then reappeared •10,558 ballots completely deleted from final count •35,169 extra ballots added to people who already voted •144,000 votes separate Senate candidates—but 10,000+ ballots vanished Why This Matters: •These numbers are bigger than the margins in major races •This affects who appears on your November ballot •Both parties were hit—this isn’t partisan, it’s corruption THREE SIMPLE RULES THEY BROKE: Rule #1: Numbers Should Never Go Backwards •What should happen: Vote totals only go UP as more people vote •What actually happened: On February 17, the vote count went DOWN seven different times •Translation: Ballots were deleted in real-time during voting Rule #2: One Person, One Ballot •What should happen: Your Voter ID gets one ballot recorded •What actually happened: 1,549 Republican voters and 54 Democrat voters had MULTIPLE ballots counted •Translation: The system is stacking extra votes on real people Rule #3: Your Ballot Stays Counted •What should happen: Once you vote, your ballot stays in the record •What actually happened: 66,146 Republican and 10,558 Democrat voter records completely vanished by the end •Translation: Real votes were erased This isn’t a theory. This is downloaded government data from the Secretary of State’s website. Every day during early voting, researchers saved a copy of who voted. When they compared those snapshots, the numbers moved BACKWARDS. That’s mathematically impossible unless someone is inside the system changing records in real-time.” Supporting fact: The Texas Secretary of State changed the data file format multiple times during early voting and made access intermittent—exactly when researchers were watching. Whoever controls our elections controls TRILLIONS in state and federal budgets. This is a national security emergency. Foreign adversaries, cartels, corporate interests—anyone with the resources to breach our systems can now pick our leaders. President Trump, AG Bondi, and DNI Gabbard need to treat this like the cyber-attack it is and lock it down BEFORE November. #TXPrimary#ElectionIntegrity Thank you @Unite4Freedom for your in-depth dive into this National Security issue.