TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #396 · 9 окт.

7.09.2025 состоялся релизPithon 3.14! На фоне хайпа про NoGIL всё позабыли про другие фичи. Особенно про Multiple Interpreters, который обещает изоляцию процессов но с эффективностью потоков! На сколько действительно это будет эффективно мы узнаем позже, потому что сейчас это лишь первый релиз с ограничениями и недоработками. Но что там про NoGIL? Теперь этот режим не экспериментальный, а официально поддерживаемый, но опциональный. Чтобы запустить без GIL нужна специальная сборка. И перед стартом нужно объявить переменную PYTHON_GIL=0 Для вас я собрал готовый репозиторий где достаточно запустить скрпит, который всё сделает: ▫️ соберет релизный Python 3.14 в новый Docker-образ ▫️ запустит тесты в контейнере (GIL, NoGIL, MultiInterpreter) ▫️ распечатает результаты Тест очень простой, усложняйте сами) Вот какие результаты у меня: === Running ThreadPoolExecutor GIL ON TOTAL TIME: 45.48 seconds === Running ThreadPoolExecutor GIL OFF TOTAL TIME: 6.14 seconds === Running basic Thread GIL ON TOTAL TIME: 45.54 seconds === Running basic Thread GIL OFF TOTAL TIME: 4.74 seconds === Running with Multi Interpreter TOTAL TIME: 18.30 seconds Если сравнивать GIL и NoGIL, то на мои 32 ядра прирост х7-x10 (почему не х32? 🤷). При этом нам обещают что скорости будут расти с новыми релизами. Режим без GIL похож (визуально) на async, тоже параллельно, тоже не по порядку. Но это не IO! и от того некоторый диссонанс в голове 😵‍💫, нас учили не так! Интересно, что чистый Thread работает быстрей чем ThreadPoolExecutor без GIL. Ну и где-то плачет один адепт мульти-интерпретаторов😭 Теперь нужно искать где они могут пригодиться с такой-то скоростью. Скорее всего своя область применения найдется. Отдельно я затестил память и вот что вышло на 32 потока: ThreadPoolExecutor GIL ON 305.228 MB ThreadPoolExecutor GIL OFF 500.176 MB basic Thread GIL ON 90.668 MB basic Thread GIL OFF 472.444 MB with Multi Interpreter 1267.788 MB Пока не знаю как к этому относиться) В целом - радует направление развития! #release

Hashtags

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #millions

当前筛选 #millions清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #4905 · 20.01.2026 г., 16:59

The Inhuman World of Ours: Millions of Pregnant Women Without the Basic Care A global shortage of nearly a million midwives is leaving pregnant women without the basic care needed to prevent harm, including the deaths of mothers and babies, according to new research. Almost half the shortage was in Africa, where nine in 10 women lived in a country without enough midwives, the researchers said. Anna af Ugglas, chief executive of the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) and one of the study’s authors, said: “Nearly 1 million missing midwives means health systems are stretched beyond capacity, midwives are overworked and underpaid, and care becomes rushed and fragmented. “Intervention rates rise, and women are more likely to experience poor-quality care or mistreatment,” she said. “This is not only a workforce issue, it is a quality and safety issue for women and babies.” For all women to receive safe, good-quality care before, during and after pregnancy, an additional 980,000 midwives would be needed across 181 countries, the study found. According to previous research, universal access to midwife-delivered care could prevent two-thirds of maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirths, saving 4.3 million lives annually by 2035. The ICM said the issue was not only a lack of training places for midwives, but also a failure in many countries to employ trained midwives where they were needed and to retain those who were working in health services. Prof Jacqueline Dunkley-Bent, ICM’s chief midwife and another of the report’s authors, said: “In many settings, midwives are educated but not absorbed into the workforce or not enabled to practise fully, compounding this already serious and universal shortage of midwives, and still leaving women without access to the care that midwives are trained to provide.” More than 90% of the global midwife shortage was in low- and middle-income countries. Africa has only 40% of the midwives it needs, the eastern Mediterranean only 31%, and the Americas just 15%, researchers found. Shortfalls were much smaller, although still present, in other regions including south-east Asia and Europe. The study, published in the journal Women and Birth, estimated the number of midwives who would be needed to carry out a list of basic midwifery tasks for all eligible women and babies in 181 countries. The tasks included counselling on contraception, antenatal care and screening, and care during childbirth. Although midwife numbers were increasing, the gap between what was needed and the available workforce looked likely to “persist well into the next decade”, the researchers said – beyond the 2030 deadline set by global sustainable development. #millions#pregnant#women#basic#care 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸