TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #397 · 12 ное.

Использование Pydantic сегодня стало нормой, и это правильно. Но иногда на ревью вижу, что используют его не всегда корректно. Например, метод BaseModel.model_dump() по умолчанию не преобразует стандартные типы, такие как datetime, UUID или Decimal, в простой сериализуемый для JSON вид. Тогда пишут кастмоный сериализатор для этих типов чтобы функция json.dump() не падала с ошибкой. import uuid from datetime import datetime from decimal import Decimal from uuid import UUID from pydantic import BaseModel class MyModel(BaseModel): id: UUID date: datetime value: Decimal obj = MyModel( id=uuid.uuid4(), date=datetime.now(), value='1.23' ) print(obj.model_dump()) # не подходит для json.dump # { # 'id': UUID('4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1'), # 'date': datetime.datetime(2025, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 111111), # 'value': Decimal('1.23') # } # добавляем свой кастомный сериализатор json.dumps(obj.model_dump(), cls=MySerializer) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2025-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } В данном случае класс MySerializer обрабатывает datetime, UUID и Decimal. Например так: class MySerializer(json.JSONEncoder): def default(self, o): if isinstance(o, Decimal): return str(o) elif isinstance(o, datetime): return o.isoformat() elif isinstance(o, UUID): return str(o) return super().default(o) Специально для тех, кто всё еще так делает - в этом нет необходимости! Pydantic может это сделать сам, просто нужно добавить параметр mode="json". json.dumps(obj.model_dump(mode="json")) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2012-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } #pydantic#libs

Резултати

Пронајдени 5 слични објави

Пребарај: #gulfsecurity

当前筛选 #gulfsecurity清除筛选
Red Nile

@rednile12 · Post #11104 · 28.02.2026 г., 13:23

🔺Continuation from above @rednile12 📌 What Happened Earlier Today Earlier on February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a coordinated military offensive against multiple targets in Iran — an operation involving aerial and missile strikes planned over weeks, according to Israeli officials. Western powers claimed the operation aimed to neutralize what they described as “existential threats” posed by Iran’s missile and nuclear programs. However, Russia and others have condemned the U.S.–Israel assault as a premeditated, unprovoked act of aggression against a sovereign state. 🔥 Iran’s Retaliatory Tactics Iran’s response appears to reflect a strategic approach, not a spontaneous counterattack: 🔹Missile Barrages First: Iran fired ballistic missiles at multiple targets hosting U.S. forces and allied positions across the Gulf — including Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE. 🔹Drone Saturation: Following the missile salvos, waves of Shahed-136 drones were reportedly used to strike high-value U.S. radar and defense infrastructure once expensive interceptor systems were already engaged. 🔹 This layered method has key implications: ▪️ It forces U.S. and allied defenses to expend high-cost interceptors against cheaper threats. ▪️ It exploits cost asymmetry, where low-cost drones can wear down advanced systems economically and tactically over time. ▪️ It demonstrates Iran’s ability to integrate UAVs into broader retaliation campaigns, not just standalone strikes. 🧠 Strategic Takeaways 📍Damage to Early Warning Capabilities If U.S. AN/FPS-132 radars are seriously degraded or destroyed, it would reduce the effectiveness of missile tracking and early warning across the region, complicating air defense coordination in a rapidly evolving war environment. 📍Cost Imbalance in Modern Air Defense Iran’s combination of missiles and inexpensive drones highlights a structural weakness in defense architectures built around costly interceptor munitions. 📍Regional Escalation Risks Today’s retaliation underscores how quickly localized strikes can escalate into broader conflict — dragging multiple Gulf states into direct confrontation, disrupting airspace, and threatening civilian infrastructure across the region. ♦️This is no ordinary exchange of fire — it reflects a turning point in regional warfare dynamics, where retaliation, sequencing, cost imbalances, and strategic targeting have dramatic implications for how future conflicts unfold. RedNile Media🌊🧭 📡@rednile12 Geopolitics | Multipolarity | Sovereignty | Strategic Reality #Iran#USA#Israel#MiddleEastCrisis#GulfSecurity