TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #397 · 12 ное.

Использование Pydantic сегодня стало нормой, и это правильно. Но иногда на ревью вижу, что используют его не всегда корректно. Например, метод BaseModel.model_dump() по умолчанию не преобразует стандартные типы, такие как datetime, UUID или Decimal, в простой сериализуемый для JSON вид. Тогда пишут кастмоный сериализатор для этих типов чтобы функция json.dump() не падала с ошибкой. import uuid from datetime import datetime from decimal import Decimal from uuid import UUID from pydantic import BaseModel class MyModel(BaseModel): id: UUID date: datetime value: Decimal obj = MyModel( id=uuid.uuid4(), date=datetime.now(), value='1.23' ) print(obj.model_dump()) # не подходит для json.dump # { # 'id': UUID('4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1'), # 'date': datetime.datetime(2025, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 111111), # 'value': Decimal('1.23') # } # добавляем свой кастомный сериализатор json.dumps(obj.model_dump(), cls=MySerializer) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2025-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } В данном случае класс MySerializer обрабатывает datetime, UUID и Decimal. Например так: class MySerializer(json.JSONEncoder): def default(self, o): if isinstance(o, Decimal): return str(o) elif isinstance(o, datetime): return o.isoformat() elif isinstance(o, UUID): return str(o) return super().default(o) Специально для тех, кто всё еще так делает - в этом нет необходимости! Pydantic может это сделать сам, просто нужно добавить параметр mode="json". json.dumps(obj.model_dump(mode="json")) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2012-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } #pydantic#libs

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #prasmichel

当前筛选 #prasmichel清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #146 · 24.10.2023 г., 07:04

AI-Generated Defense Fails Rapper in Federal Trial Hello, AI & Law community! Rapper Prakazrel "Pras" Michel, convicted of federal crimes tied to a foreign influence campaign, claims he deserves a new trial because his attorney employed an experimental AI program to construct his closing argument. This move did not go as planned. Michel's new legal team asserts that this AI-generated defense was ineffective, resulting in a frivolous argument. Michel's trial counsel, David Kenner, stands accused of not delivering a solid defense. Beyond the use of AI, he was criticized for failing to understand the facts and allegations surrounding the case. Kenner used an experimental AI program, possibly with financial interests involved, to create his closing argument. The use of this AI technology in a federal trial marks a first, but it resulted in a closing argument that made frivolous claims and overlooked critical aspects of the government's case, severely damaging the defense. This AI-related incident echoes a prior case where an attorney admitted to using AI to draft court filings that cited six non-existent cases, generating concerns about AI's role in legal proceedings. The AI program in question was developed by EyeLevel.AI and was praised for its ability to offer insights faster than conventional means. However, it appears that its use led to unintended consequences in Michel's case. The revelations from this trial might shape the conversation around AI's role in legal defense. Stay tuned for more on this intriguing development! #AI#AIinLaw#LegalAI#PrasMichel