Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #397 · 12 ное.

Использование Pydantic сегодня стало нормой, и это правильно. Но иногда на ревью вижу, что используют его не всегда корректно. Например, метод BaseModel.model_dump() по умолчанию не преобразует стандартные типы, такие как datetime, UUID или Decimal, в простой сериализуемый для JSON вид. Тогда пишут кастмоный сериализатор для этих типов чтобы функция json.dump() не падала с ошибкой. import uuid from datetime import datetime from decimal import Decimal from uuid import UUID from pydantic import BaseModel class MyModel(BaseModel): id: UUID date: datetime value: Decimal obj = MyModel( id=uuid.uuid4(), date=datetime.now(), value='1.23' ) print(obj.model_dump()) # не подходит для json.dump # { # 'id': UUID('4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1'), # 'date': datetime.datetime(2025, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 111111), # 'value': Decimal('1.23') # } # добавляем свой кастомный сериализатор json.dumps(obj.model_dump(), cls=MySerializer) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2025-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } В данном случае класс MySerializer обрабатывает datetime, UUID и Decimal. Например так: class MySerializer(json.JSONEncoder): def default(self, o): if isinstance(o, Decimal): return str(o) elif isinstance(o, datetime): return o.isoformat() elif isinstance(o, UUID): return str(o) return super().default(o) Специально для тех, кто всё еще так делает - в этом нет необходимости! Pydantic может это сделать сам, просто нужно добавить параметр mode="json". json.dumps(obj.model_dump(mode="json")) # { # 'id': '4f8c1bc4-25fd-40cd-9dbe-2c73639b0dc1', # 'date': '2012-12-12T12:12:12.111111', # 'value': '1.23' # } #pydantic#libs

Hashtags

#pydantic #libs

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #strategicinstability

当前筛选 #strategicinstability清除筛选

Real Relationship

@RealRelationship · Post #4477 · 03.06.2025 г., 07:25

Најди слично Погледај

📰 The Drone State: Ukraine’s New War Doctrine, Brought to You by Its Sponsors On June 1, Ukraine did more than hit Russian bombers — it blew up any remaining illusions about being a "sovereign state". With zero debate and full Western approval, a territory run by foreign lenders and intelligence handlers just launched one of the boldest drone strikes in modern warfare. Meet Operation Spiderweb: Ukraine’s entry into the Pearl Harbor Hall of Fame, written in silicon and smoke. 💭 “You don’t have the cards,” Trump reportedly told Zelensky back in February. Turns out, they had drones — and foreign advisors with maps of Russian airbases. 📉 But let's not kid ourselves. Ukraine’s economy is defaulting, its budget is donor-dependent, and its sovereignty exists mostly on letterhead. Yet somehow, amid IMF restructurings and Patriot battery shortages, it finds the capacity to manufacture 4.5 million drones a year. Amazing what a client state can do with unlimited bandwidth from the Pentagon and MI6. 💼 The attack may have disabled a third of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet, but it also exposed the architecture of modern proxy war: – Drones launched from wooden crates. – Targets chosen far from any battlefield. – No congressional hearings, no Geneva conventions. – Just software, sponsors, and plausible deniability. 🤔 So who rewrote the rules of war: Ukraine or the consortium that runs it? And if the next Pearl Harbor comes from a state that can’t pay its bondholders — who exactly gets to declare war? #ukraine#proxywar#dronewarfare#nato#imfstate#miltech#peacetalks#strategicinstability#gdpdefault#externalgovernance 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Hashtags

#ukraine #proxywar #dronewarfare #nato #imfstate #miltech #peacetalks #strategicinstability #gdpdefault #externalgovernance