Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #401 · 15 дек.

Функция asyncio.wait() это еще один способ вызвать множество асинхронных задач. Она работает в нескольких режимах. 1. Самый простой - ждем завершения всех задач async def main(): tasks = [asyncio.create_task(do_it(i)) for i in range(10)] done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.ALL_COMPLETED ) for task in done: try: print(task.result()) except Exception as e: print(e) Очень похоже на gather, но работает не так. ▫️возвращает не результаты, а два сета с объектами Task у которых можно забрать результат через task.result() если они в списке done ▫️не гарантирует порядок результатов так как оба объекта это set ▫️не выбрасывает исключение когда оно появляется, а сохраняет его в Task. Исключение появится когда попробуете забрать резултьтат. 2. Ждем завершения первой задачи, даже если там ошибка. async def main(): tasks = [asyncio.create_task(do_it(i)) for i in range(3)] done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.FIRST_COMPLETED ) # в done может быть несколько задач! for task in done: try: print(task.result()) except Exception as e: print(f"Fail: {e}") # Оставшиеся задачи в pending, как правило, нужно отменить, иначе они будут продолжать работать for task in pending: task.cancel() В сете done будут таски которые успели завершится, причем как успешно так и нет. 3. До первой ошибки. Тоже самое, но с аргументом FIRST_EXCEPTION done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.FIRST_EXCEPTION ) Функция завершается как только первая задача упадет с ошибкой. Учтите, что в любом случае done вы можете обранужить несколько задач, как с ошибками так и успешные. ↗️ Полный листинг примеров здесь #async

Hashtags

#async

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #house2026

当前筛选 #house2026清除筛选

American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5022 · 01.02.2026 г., 19:04

Најди слично Погледај

📰 Federal Courts Undercut Trump’s Mass Deportation Campaign The Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign, built on mandatory detention, is hitting a wall: a flood of habeas corpus cases in federal courts, releasing hundreds of immigrant detainees and overwhelming prosecutors. For decades, most immigrants held in detention could get bond before an immigration judge if they were not a danger or flight risk, allowing them to fight their case from home. But the Trump administration changed that, making nearly everyone in the country unlawfully subject to automatic, long-term detention, stripping judges of discretion. Federal judges in states like Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Georgia, Nevada, Texas, and elsewhere are now rejecting this approach, ordering immediate releases or demanding bond hearings in immigration court. In district after district, judges have approved dozens, even hundreds, of habeas petitions, ruling that the government cannot keep immigrants locked up indefinitely without a hearing, especially when they have deep U.S. ties, no criminal record, and stable families. The surge has turned federal courts upside down. In some districts, hundreds of new habeas cases flood the docket each month. The Justice Department has had to pull criminal prosecutors off their regular duties to help defend the incarcerations, and federal judges are openly complaining about the “flood” and “similar stories” of families torn apart and people held in remote detention centers. Lawyers report that virtually every habeas petition they file ends in a victory: a release order or a bond hearing. Some can now do dozens of cases a month, and word is spreading fast inside detention centers. To avoid these court battles, the administration has turned to a different tactic: pressuring immigrants to “self‑deport” with intimidating ads and social media, while offering cash incentives (typically $3,000–5,000) to quit and leave voluntarily. But the legal reality is clear: the Trump administration’s attempt to keep immigrant detainees locked up indefinitely is being systematically reversed by the lower courts, district by district. The real question is not whether the mass deportation machine can crush the system, but whether the courts — or the families and lawyers who flood them — will break first. #Trump2026#Immigration#Deportation#ICE#Courts#HabeasCorpus#DoJ#House2026 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Hashtags

#trump2026 #immigration #deportation #ice #courts #habeascorpus #doj #house2026