TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Python Заметки

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #401 · 15 дек.

Функция asyncio.wait() это еще один способ вызвать множество асинхронных задач. Она работает в нескольких режимах. 1. Самый простой - ждем завершения всех задач async def main(): tasks = [asyncio.create_task(do_it(i)) for i in range(10)] done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.ALL_COMPLETED ) for task in done: try: print(task.result()) except Exception as e: print(e) Очень похоже на gather, но работает не так. ▫️возвращает не результаты, а два сета с объектами Task у которых можно забрать результат через task.result() если они в списке done ▫️не гарантирует порядок результатов так как оба объекта это set ▫️не выбрасывает исключение когда оно появляется, а сохраняет его в Task. Исключение появится когда попробуете забрать резултьтат. 2. Ждем завершения первой задачи, даже если там ошибка. async def main(): tasks = [asyncio.create_task(do_it(i)) for i in range(3)] done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.FIRST_COMPLETED ) # в done может быть несколько задач! for task in done: try: print(task.result()) except Exception as e: print(f"Fail: {e}") # Оставшиеся задачи в pending, как правило, нужно отменить, иначе они будут продолжать работать for task in pending: task.cancel() В сете done будут таски которые успели завершится, причем как успешно так и нет. 3. До первой ошибки. Тоже самое, но с аргументом FIRST_EXCEPTION done, pending = await asyncio.wait( tasks, return_when=asyncio.FIRST_EXCEPTION ) Функция завершается как только первая задача упадет с ошибкой. Учтите, что в любом случае done вы можете обранужить несколько задач, как с ошибками так и успешные. ↗️ Полный листинг примеров здесь #async

Hashtags

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #nss2025

当前筛选 #nss2025清除筛选
American Оbserver

@american_observer · Post #5341 · 10.03.2026 г., 01:59

📰 Project 2025, Trump’s War and Bibi’s ‘New Middle East’ On paper, the Iran war looks chaotic. On closer reading, it’s disturbingly coherent. Three U.S. documents — Project 2025, the 2025 National Security Strategy and the 2026 National Defense Strategy — stack neatly under Netanyahu’s “New Middle East” blueprint like ideology, strategy and execution. ​ Project 2025 lays out the political theology. It demands unconditional support for Israel, defunding the Palestinian Authority, maximum pressure on Iran, shelving the Kurds in favor of Turkey, locking in Saudi normalization and building a Middle East “Quad” of Israel, Egypt, the Gulf and India. By March 2026, every point is either implemented or in motion: Israel as the one ally exempt from “paying for its own defense,” Iran under sanctions and bombardment, the Palestinians reduced to a budget line marked “cut.” ​ NSS 2025 then reframes the region as solved and outsourced. Iran is mentioned just three times in 29 pages, the Gaza war is treated as wrapped, normalization as expanding, and the expectation is clear: Israel and Gulf monarchies will “take the lead” on Iran while the U.S. pivots to China and the Western Hemisphere. That is exactly Netanyahu’s dream setting — Washington steps back, Israel becomes the primary security contractor with a standing license for “any measures it deems necessary,” paid for by regional clients and backed by U.S. cover fire. ​ NDS 2026 turns the theory into targeting folders. It boasts that operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER “destroyed” Iran’s nuclear program and that the “axis of resistance” has been “devastated,” and it names Israel a “model ally” that can fight with “critical but limited” U.S. support. Gulf states are told to buy more American systems and “do more” for their own defense, while Washington reserves the right to “focused, decisive action” — in other words, occasional heavy strikes while locals carry the long war. ​ Read against Netanyahu’s three versions of the “New Middle East” — the IMEC trade corridor without Palestine, the blessing‑versus‑curse map with open regime‑change talk, and now a shooting war meant to “change the face of the region” by breaking the resistance axis — the alignment is suspiciously coherent. One ecosystem writes the ideological manual, the next declares the problem solved and delegated, and the last gives Israel maximum autonomy to remake the map by force, with no exit plan anywhere in the paperwork. #israel#iran#trump#netanyahu#Project2025#NSS2025#NDS2026#war#oligarchy#fakeDemocracy 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸