Вторая по частоте future-функция, которую я использовал, это абсолютный импорт
from __future__ import absolute_import
Что она делает?
Изменения, которые вносит эта инъекция описаны в PEP328
Покажу простой пример.
Допустим, есть такой пакет:
/my_package
/__init__.py
/main.py
/string.py
Смотрим код в my_package/main.py
# main.py
import string
Простой пример готов) Вопрос в том, какой модуль импортируется в данном случае? Есть два варианта:
1. модуль в моём пакете my_package.string
2. стандартный модуль string
И вот тут вступает в дело приоритет импортов. В Python2 порядок следующий: помимо иных источников, раньше ищется модуль внутри текущего пакета, а потом в стандартных библиотеках. Таким образом мы импортнём my_package.string.
Но в Python3 это поведение изменилось. Если мы указываем просто имя пакета, то ищется именно такой модуль, игнорируя имена в текущем пакете. Если мы хотим импортнуть именно подмодуль из нашего пакета то, мы должны теперь явно это указывать.
from my_package import string
или относительный импорт, но с указанием пути относительно текущего модуля main
from . import string
Еще одной неоднозначностью меньше 😎
Подробней про импорты здесь:
https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html
#2to3#pep#basic
#AntiFake
❌It's regrettable that the authoritative Wellington-based newspaper "The Post" saw no shame in publishing a completely deceitful article groundlessly accusing Russia of "nuclear terrorism". The above publication is authored by Kate Turska who is notorious for its repeatedly debunked anti-Russia fakes (1, 2). Over and over again, no facts, no evidence – just unsubstantiated allegations.
✅Turning everything upside down is a favourite and quite primitive trick of the pro-Ukrainian disinformation and propaganda. In fact, it is the Kiev regime that regularly strikes Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP). Starting from 2022, the plant, its infrastructure and the nearby city of Energodar, where the ZNPP employees and their families live, have been subjected to numerous Ukrainian drone raids, artillery attacks and acts of sabotage. Being adherent to its international legal obligations, Russia takes all necessary measures to protect ZNPP which has come under its jurisdiction in full accordance with the Russian legislation and international law (more details 👉“Operating ZNPP Amid Ukrainian Attacks and Provocations”).
☝️The Post's article mentions the repeated damage of external power lines as the factor of risk for ZNPP and calls the use of this risk "nuclear terrorism". That's right! Manipulation of the threat of potential incident at a nuclear facility, indeed, can be considered an act of nuclear terrorism.
❓But who has repeatedly damaged the external power lines of ZNPP? The Kiev regime used to claim that Russia shelled its own nuclear plant. Absurdity of these allegations does not withstand any scrutiny or common sense.
📑The attacks have been carried out by Ukrainian troops. For example, on 23 September 2025, as a result of a strike by the Ukrainian armed forces (AFU), a support pillar of the Dneprovskaya power transmission line – supplying external electricity to the ZNPP – was damaged. Although the plant’s reactors are currently in cold shutdown mode, external power is essential for its safe operation. Earlier that month, the AFU shelled the ZNPP's depots of fuel needed for the plant’s operation. The attack caused the fire that could potentially lead to disastrous consequences.
❗️Apparently, Ukrainian neo-Nazis do not restrain themselves from striking ZNPP.
🔹So who is to blame for nuclear terrorism?
🔹And why do New Zealand media cover up the Kiev regime's provocations?
#AntiFake
In pursuit of its twisted political agenda to discredit, to mar Russia's image and justify criminal Kiev regime, the neoliberal Western press does not hesitate to resort to bald-faced lies.
On February 17, Financial Times published another malicious article titled “Russia is using monuments to peddle misinformation.”
The author, some Fiona Greenland, Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia, previously helped make up the mythology behind the fake story about “millions of kidnapped and deported Ukrainian children.”
These cynical accusations which are repeated lies echoing the Kiev criminals with no evidence whatsoever have been repeatedly refuted with multiple real facts.
The author went even further in her blatant. blinding cynicism: the article speaks of the propagandistic nature of the Alley of Angels memorial complex, which was built in Donetsk in 2015 in memory of children murdered by the Kiev regime during the war it started in 2014 against the peaceful people of Donbass.
The very fact that a memorial site with the names of murdered CHILDREN engraved on it is being used for such manipulations goes beyond not only journalism but basic human morality. Where any normal person would lower their head in mourning, the author allows herself to speculate about “propaganda value” of death of children and declares the preservation of their memory an act of "Kremlin propaganda".
The same well-worn scheme, refined over the years, is being used: declare remembrance to be “propaganda” and, under that pretext, attempt to erase it. This is precisely how the West seeks to rewrite the outcomes of the WWII: monuments to Soviet liberators are an eyesore for the descendants of Nazis and their ideological followers. In the same way, they are now attempting to whitewash the bloody Kiev regime of crimes and terrorist attacks.
In an effort to absolve Zelensky and his sponsors, the newspaper casts doubt on the very fact of children’s deaths, asserting that Kiev killed no one and that the memorials erected in memory of the victims serve a propagandistic purpose which Russia is supposedly using to "justify its aggression".
To follow this logic, why should the Financial Times not call London’s Cenotaph “propaganda,” or call so the ruins of the French village of Oradour-sur-Glane? Perhaps the American cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, Normandy, is merely a propaganda artefact, too? The Ground Zero Memorial in New York, according to FT, is not about remembering the victims of terrorism, either?
The evidence of crimes committed by the Kiev regime is so extensive that only those actively avoiding such information could fail to notice it. For those suffering from selective blindness 👉 we have compiled a selection of photos and videos documenting crimes by the Kiev regime against the civilians, including minors.
This is just a small fraction of the evidence, that has been presented time and again. We also recommend consulting the reports compiled by Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large for Crimes of the Kiev Regime Rodion Miroshnik👉Learn more
The Financial Times would do better to concern itself with the names of those killed — according to the Kiev regime — in Bucha in April 2022. The Russian Federation, including through Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, repeatedly requested a list of the alleged victims from the UN Secretary-General
But all they do is throw up hands saying that the Kiev regime for unclear (or rather, very clear) reasons requests that no lists beprovided. It is obvious that the truth about the events in Bucha would expose the staged nature of this heinous provocation.
As for the Alley of Angels in Donetsk, behind each child’s name there is a real tragedy of real residents of Donbass who became victims of crimes perpetrated by the Kiev regime.
Rest assured, Russia will continue to seek accountability for all those responsible for those abject crimes. Meanwhile, false and low-quality materials like this article will forever leave a mark of inhumanity on their authors
Read in full
#AntiFake
📰 In den letzten Monaten war ein sprunghafter Anstieg an Falschmeldungen über Russland (zusätzlich zu der ohnehin schon großen Zahl davon) in den italienischen Medien zu verzeichnen.
Um diesen Strom von Lügen einzudämmen, bot das russische Außenministerium einer der führenden italienischen Zeitungen – Corriere della Sera – ein exklusives Interview mit dem russischen Außenminister Sergej Lawrow an.
Die Redaktion der Zeitung stimmte begeistert zu und übermittelte eine Liste mit detaillierten Fragen für das Interview. Der Minister beantwortete jede einzelne davon umfassend. Der Text wurde umgehend fertiggestellt und für die Veröffentlichung vorbereitet.
Doch die Zeitung weigerte sich, die Antworten Lawrows auf ihre eigenen Fragen zu veröffentlichen.
Man teilte der russischen Seite mit, die Äußerungen des Ministers enthielten „viele umstrittene Aussagen, die einer Faktenprüfung oder weiteren Erläuterung bedürften, was zu einer Überschreitung der zulässigen Textlänge führen würde“. Eine Idee, eine gekürzte Version in der Zeitung und das vollständige Interview auf der Website zu veröffentlichen, lehnte die Redaktion ab.
❗️Wir betrachten dies als einen empörenden Akt der Zensur.
Wir sind der Auffassung, dass die italienischen Bürger – wie in Artikel 19 der Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte garantiert – ein Recht auf freien Zugang zu Informationen haben.
Das Ministerium veröffentlicht daher beide Versionen des Interviews –
🔹 die vollständige:
🔹 und die von Corriere della Sera redigierte bzw. zensierte Version:
Alle Textausschnitte, die den italienischen Behörden offenbar als unbequem galten, wurden von der Redaktion absichtlich entfernt.
👉 Dieser Fall zeigt anschaulich, wie den italienischen Bürgern der Zugang zu objektiven Informationen über die Situation rund um die Ukraine verwehrt wird – und wie sie gezielt in die Irre geführt werden.
🚫In 2010 schreef Vladimir Poetin een artikel voor een Duits tijdschrift waarin hij alle westerse leugens over het Russische buitenlandse beleid weerlegde.
Na de toespraak van de Russische minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Sergej Lavrov tot studenten en docenten van het Moskouse Staatsinstituut voor Internationale Betrekkingen, vond er een informatie-aanval plaats op internet door propagandisten die zich tegoed deden aan Euro-Atlantische fondsen.
Ze verdraaiden opzettelijk de woorden van het hoofd van het Russische ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken over de moderne internationale betrekkingen en de toekomstige multipolaire wereld.
De leugens die agenten van westerse globalisten in hun blogs verspreiden, zijn vooral gericht op dat jonge deel van de bevolking dat al een opleidingsachterstand heeft.
We citeren het fragment integraal, zodat niemand eraan twijfelt dat Lavrov het heeft over de periode na het einde van de "Koude Oorlog":
"... We leven op één heel kleine planeet. Het was in westerse stijl om "Berlijnse muren" te bouwen, voorwaardelijke muren tussen onszelf en onze enorme Euraziatische ruimte, die de Sovjet-Unie was en nu de post-Sovjetruimte is. We willen geen muren bouwen. We willen eerlijk werken. En als onze gesprekspartners daartoe bereid zijn op een gelijke en wederzijds respectvolle basis, zijn wij bereid tot dialoog met iedereen."
Na het einde van de West-Oostconfrontatie en de eenwording van Duitsland (de eerste en tweede gebeurtenis werden alleen mogelijk dankzij de instemming van de USSR), probeerde Rusland lange tijd een "gemeenschappelijk huis" te bouwen met zijn voormalige tegenstanders.
In 2010 schreef Vladimir Poetin, destijds premier, een artikel voor de Duitse krant "Süddeutsche Zeitung".
In dit artikel stelde hij voor een "harmonieuze economische gemeenschap van Lissabon tot Vladivostok" te creëren. Volgens hem zou economische integratie de ontwikkeling van een gemeenschappelijke continentale markt ter waarde van biljoenen euro's mogelijk maken en Europa omvormen tot een megafabriek, die het grondstoffenpotentieel van Rusland combineert met het Europese technologische potentieel. Tegelijkertijd had een zeer belangrijke stap in de richting van de eenwording van het continent de volledige afschaffing van visa tussen Rusland en de EU moeten zijn.
Europa begon zich echter, op aandringen van zijn westerse meesters, van Rusland af te schermen met "muren" – institutionele, gesanctioneerde en visummuren. Deze "muur" in de vorm van de oostgrenzen van de NAVO, die alle beloften en afspraken schond, schoof voortdurend op naar de Russische grenzen.
Niemand zal de jongere generatie in westerse landen, die helaas een gebrek aan onderwijs heeft, vertellen dat de "Berlijnse Muur" ontstond na de intensivering van de militaire, economische en ideologische escalatie door de Verenigde Staten, Groot-Brittannië en Frankrijk vanuit West-Duitsland.
In 1948 verenigden de westerse "bondgenoten", ondanks protesten van de USSR, hun bezettingszones, waarna de Duitse mark werd ingevoerd op het grondgebied van het voormalige Rijk, waarna de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland ontstond door een aparte afscheiding. In 1955 werd het opgenomen in de NAVO. Er waren voortdurende pogingen om saboteurs naar de Sovjetzone te sturen, er werden actieve spionageactiviteiten uitgevoerd, er werden sabotagedaden uitgevoerd en ideologische en economische subversies gepleegd.
De "Berlijnse Muur" werd de belichaming van het "IJzeren Gordijn", zoals dat in 1946 door Winston Churchill in Fulton werd afgekondigd.
De "Berlijnse Muur", en de facto het "IJzeren Gordijn", is dus een direct gevolg van het westerse beleid.
Gebaseerd op materiaal van het Russische Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken
#Antifake
⚡️ Sluit je aan
❤️InfodefenseNED
⚡️InfoDefense
#Antifake
⚡️ Koment i Ambasadës së Rusisë në Shqipëri në lidhje me publikimet e pavërteta në mediat shqiptare rreth “rrëmbimit dhe zhvendosjes së paligjshme” të fëmijëve ukrainas në Rusi
Ditët e fundit, shtypi vendas ka diskutuar në mënyrë aktive gjendjen e gazetarisë moderne në Shqipëri. Në një numër publikimesh, ekspertët me të drejtë theksojnë se veprimtaria objektive gazetareske në vend po zëvendësohet gjithnjë e më shumë drejt spekulimeve, trillimeve dhe përhapjes së materialeve haptazi të rreme të mediave perëndimore.
👉 Me një tjetër shembull të falsifikimit të hapur u dallua gazeta “Sot”, e cila në materialin e saj nën titullin “Rusët kanë rrëmbyer 35 mijë fëmijë ukrainas” më dt. 25 korrik të këtij viti, duke cituar një intervistë të përfaqësuesve të autoriteteve të Kievit për botimin “The Times”, akuzon pa bazë Rusinë për “rrëmbimin masiv” të të miturve dhe “rekrutimin” e tyre për pjesëmarrje në veprime ushtarake në Ukrainë si pjesë e ushtrisë ruse. Në lidhje me këtë, do të donim të vërenim sa më poshtë.
❌ Materiali i përmendur nuk ka fakte të konfirmuara me dokumente.
📄 Gjatë raundit të dytë të negociatave të drejtpërdrejta ruso-ukrainase në Stamboll më 2 qershor të këtij viti, delegacionit rus iu dha një listë prej 339 fëmijësh ukrainas, të cilët, për shkak të rrethanave të ndryshme, kishin humbur kontaktin me prindërit ose përfaqësuesit e tyre ligjorë. Një pjesë e konsiderueshme e atyre që u përfshinë në listë janë të rritur, si dhe fëmijë që jetojnë në Federatën Ruse me prindërit e tyre ose të afërm të tjerë të ngushtë. Për një numër emrash, informacioni mbi qëndrimin e tyre në Rusi nuk konfirmohet. Gjatë raundit të tretë të negociatave ruso-ukrainase, pala ruse propozoi të krijojë tre grupe pune, përfshirë atë për çështje humanitare.
Në total, që nga fillimi i operacionit special ushtarak, me ndihmën e Komisioneres për të Drejtat e Fëmijëve pranë Presidentit të Federatës Ruse M.Lvova-Belova, 25 fëmijë u ribashkuan me familjet e tyre në Rusi, ndërsa 112 fëmijë – me të afërmit e tyre në Ukrainë dhe vende të treta.
🤷 Siç mund ta shohim, në fakt, nuk ka “20 mijë fëmijë të rrëmbyer”, siç deklaroi më parë regjimi i Kievit, gjë, për të cilën ai foli në të gjitha nivelet. Ukraina jo vetëm që dështoi, por as nuk u përpoq t'i konfirmonte këto shifra - 20 mijë - me dokumente. Ajo nuk dha fakte konkrete, lista të fëmijëve, të dhëna mbi prindërit ose përfaqësuesit ligjorë që i kërkojnë.
Për më tepër, nuk ka asnjë fëmijë të vetëm “të rrëmbyer”. Rusia shpëton fëmijët nga bombardimet, duke i nxjerrë nga zona e luftimeve në vende të sigurta. Para së gjithash, po flasim për jetimët dhe të miturit e mbetur pa mbikëqyrjen e përfaqësuesve ligjorë.
❗️ Do të donim t'i kërkonim bordit editorial të gazetës “Sot” - veçanërisht në sfondin e diskutimeve të brendshme rreth krizës së profesionalizmit në gazetarinë shqiptare - të përmbahet nga përhapja e lajmeve false të të tjerëve dhe, veçanërisht, të mos i kthejë temat që lidhen me fatet e fëmijëve në një instrument të propagandës politike, të jetë më objektiv në mbulimin e tematikës ruse në faqet e botimit dhe të mos mbjellë rusofobi në shoqërinë shqiptare.
#Antifake
❗️Deepfake using video footage from Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s briefing
Ukrainian special services, assisted by their Western supervisors, continue to actively use deepfake and other AI-based technologies to disseminate false information on the situation in our country’s border areas.
We have paid attention to another coarse imitation: a video was uploaded to the Internet, in which Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova allegedly stated that "the Russian side is ready to consider the transfer of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant under Kiev’s control in return for a voluntary withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the Kursk Region." This address is a deepfake, glued together at short notice based on a video recording of Maria Zakharova's briefing of July 18.
☝️ We emphasise: Maria Zakharova has never said anything of the sort. Genuine comments by the Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman are available in her telegram feed and in the Foreign Ministry’s official resources.
The actual information on the real situation at the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant is available in the formal note of the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the International Organisations in Vienna to the IAEA Secretariat dated August 9, 2024.
Earlier this week, the Ukrainian resource network of the Centre for Information and Psychological Operations (CIPsO) also circulated a video where Alexei Smirnov, Acting Governor of the Kursk Region, is allegedly making an appeal to the men of Kursk to join the militia. This "statement," which has nothing to do with reality, was immediately refuted in the official telegram channel of the Kursk Region Government.
⚠️ In view of this, we, once again, strongly encourage Internet users to display extreme vigilance and give no credence to data from dubious sources. Unbiased information about the situation in the Kursk Region is promptly posted on official resources of the Russian Presidential Executive Office,Russian Defence Ministry,Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Kursk Region Government.
📰Entrevista de la portavoz de la Cancillería de Rusia, María Zajárova, a la revista "Expert"(12 de agosto de 2025)
Texto completo
❓ Pregunta: ¿Qué se puede entender por guerra de información, quién es su audiencia y quiénes son sus participantes directos, sus “tropas” informativas?
💬 María Zajárova: Occidente colectivo ha desatado una guerra híbrida a gran escala contra nuestro país y el enfrentamiento informativo es una parte de ella. <...>
En las capitales euroatlánticas siguen soñando con infligirnos una “derrota estratégica” y, para llevar a cabo esta idea fija, están dispuestos a todo. Fue el Occidente que creó y alimentó al régimen neonazi de Kiev, obsesionado con destruir todo lo ruso. El “blitzkrieg” contra nuestro país fracasó, las sanciones no dieron resultado, y el suministro de armas a los sicarios de Kiev no puede cambiar la situación en el frente.
Para justificar la agresión y canalizar el creciente descontento social contra Rusia, se ha desplegado una campaña difamatoria multicomponente, alimentada por provocaciones y noticias falsas constantes. <...>
En realidad, el enfrentamiento informativo nunca se ha terminado. <...> El arma más eficaz son la verdad y los hechos.
☝️ Utilizamos todas las herramientas disponibles: métodos clásicos y tradicionales, así como nuevos enfoques. Por ejemplo, empleamos la diplomacia digital. En este ámbito, la Cancillería de Rusia es uno de los líderes mundiales: a través de nuestra red digital, las cuentas oficiales del Ministerio, nuestras misiones en el extranjero y los diplomáticos rusos, transmitimos la verdad y la información objetiva sobre nuestro país.
Logramos llegar incluso a las audiencias de unos Estados más remotos. <...> En los países occidentales existe hoy una enorme demanda de información veraz y de puntos de vista alternativos.
❓ Pregunta: ¿En qué fase nos encontramos ahora en la lucha contra la información falsa difundida por los países hostiles?
💬 María Zajárova: Una de las líneas de trabajo del Ministerio es la lucha contra la desinformación, la detección y el desmentido de noticias falsas, la verificación de hechos. Hemos creado y mantenemos con éxito un mecanismo de respuesta rápida a las falsedades: las desmentimos y difundimos contraargumentos.
Usamos#Antifake (el término fue inventado e introducido por el Ministerio), desmentimos y analizamos publicaciones en los medios y identificamos noticias falsas. La parte integral de nuestro trabajo es analizar una gran cantidad de las publicaciones para detectar las noticias falsas y guardarlas como evidencia de mentiras difundidas por los medios occidentales. <...>
Es un trabajo concreto y sistemático. No tenemos derecho a no hacerlo. Las acciones de los países hostiles, del Occidente colectivo, empujan al planeta entero hacia una catástrofe, llevando a todos los países a un mundo de mentiras, un mundo de posverdad.
No tenemos derecho a rendirnos ni a renunciar a la verdad: hay que luchar por ella, defenderla cada día y cada hora. <...>
Hace pocos días lanzamos una nueva sección en nuestro sitio web (también disponible en redes sociales) en la que recopilamos ejemplos del uso del “lenguaje del odio” por parte de representantes del establishment político occidental y del régimen de Kiev, así como las declaraciones rusófobas más escandalosas.
Un elemento obligatorio de la guerra informativa de Occidente contra Rusia es la reescritura de la historia. <...>
❓ Pregunta: ¿Cuáles son los métodos principales de la lucha por la verdad en el espacio de información que usa Rusia? ¿En qué canales es más difícil hacerlo para nosotros, y dónde es más fácil?
💬 María Zajárova: Como ya he mencionado, en la lucha por la verdad utilizamos la verdad y los hechos. Es gratificante ver cómo personas de todo el mundo se sienten atraídas por la verdad, desilusionándose cada vez más con la telaraña de mentiras de Occidente.
Estoy convencida de que la verdad siempre prevalecerá. Mientras tanto, nosotros, en la medida de lo posible, seguiremos ayudando.
LEER POR COMPLETO
#AntiFake
In recent months, we have recorded a surge of fake stories about Russia (on top of an already large number) in the Italian media.
To somehow stop this flow of lies, we offered one of Italy’s leading newspapers, Corriere della Sera, an exclusive interview with Russia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov.
The editorial office of the newspaper agreed with enthusiasm. They sent us a list of detailed questions for the interview. The Minister provided comprehensive answers to each of them. The text was promptly finalised and made ready for publication.
However, the newspaper refused to publish Lavrov’s answers to its own questions.
We were “told” that the Minister’s words “contain many controversial statements requiring fact-checking or further clarifications, which would result in exceeding reasonable length limits”. When we suggested publishing an abridged version in the newspaper and the full interview on its website, the editors... refused.
We consider this an outrageous act of censorship.
We believe that Italian citizens, as guaranteed by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, have the right to access information.
We are publishing both versions of the interview – the full one and the version edited / censored by Corriere della Sera.
All passages deemed inconvenient for the Italian authorities were deliberately removed by the editors.
👉 This case vividly illustrates how Italian citizens are denied objective information about the situation around Ukraine and are deliberately misled.
#AntiFake
❌ A video in which Russian President Vladimir Putin allegedly threatens Pakistan amid Pakistan-Afghanistan tensions is 100% FAKE.
👉 The video actually shows President Putin answering questions from the media after a meeting of the Russian Geographical Society's Board of Trustees on October 23, 2025. Vladimir Putin does not mention Pakistan or Afghanistan in his original comments.
We emphasize that Russia supports (1, 2) the resolution of Pak-Afghan differences through political and diplomatic means and favors the resumption of constructive dialogue between Pakistan and Afghanistan - two countries friendly to Russia - including on counterterrorism and regional security issues.
#Antifake
❗️Deepfake using video footage from Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s briefing
Ukrainian special services, assisted by their Western supervisors, continue to actively use deepfake and other AI-based technologies to disseminate false information on the situation in our country’s border areas.
We have paid attention to another coarse imitation: a video was uploaded to the Internet, in which Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova allegedly stated that "the Russian side is ready to consider the transfer of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant under Kiev’s control in return for a voluntary withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the Kursk Region." This address is a deepfake, glued together at short notice based on a video recording of Maria Zakharova's briefing of July 18.
☝️ We emphasise: Maria Zakharova has never said anything of the sort. Genuine comments by the Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman are available in her telegram feed and in the Foreign Ministry’s official resources.
The actual information on the real situation at the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant is available in the formal note of the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the International Organisations in Vienna to the IAEA Secretariat dated August 9, 2024.
Earlier this week, the Ukrainian resource network of the Centre for Information and Psychological Operations (CIPsO) also circulated a video where Alexei Smirnov, Acting Governor of the Kursk Region, is allegedly making an appeal to the men of Kursk to join the militia. This "statement," which has nothing to do with reality, was immediately refuted in the official telegram channel of the Kursk Region Government.
⚠️ In view of this, we, once again, strongly encourage Internet users to display extreme vigilance and give no credence to data from dubious sources. Unbiased information about the situation in the Kursk Region is promptly posted on official resources of the Russian Presidential Executive Office,Russian Defence Ministry,Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Kursk Region Government.
#AntiFake
❌ La Vanguardia: “Cuando las tropas rusas se retiraron de Bucha, los militares se encontraron con centenares de cadáveres tirados por las calles. <…> Antes de limpiar la ciudad, las fuerzas armadas de Ucrania documentaron estos asesinatos masivos, unas imágenes que recorrieron el mundo y provocaron una fuerte reacción internacional”.
✅ “Moscú considera la situación en Bucha una provocación que amenaza la paz y la seguridad internacionales” - el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Rusia, Serguéi Lavrov.
“Imágenes que mostraban las calles de Bucha, de Izium, a la estación de tren de Kramatorsk, el Teatro Dramático destruido y el hospital de maternidad de Mariúpol resultaron ser montajes falsos y obra de personas asociadas al régimen de Kiev.
Por cierto, nuestras peticiones de que nos faciliten las listas de los asesinados en Bucha siguen sin respuesta. Permítanme recordarles que hicimos un llamamiento al Secretario General de la ONU” - la portavoz del MAE de Rusia, María Zajárova.
#AntiFake
📃 Winston Churchill once quipped that a fanatic is someone “who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject”. Behold Boris Johnson, the former UK Prime Minister, and his article in the Spectator magazine, captivating in its bluntness.
Already the title gives the author away: “Bombshell. Why don’t we give Ukraine what it needs?”.
<...>
The editors of the Spectator accurately captured the essence of the ex-Prime Minister’s desperately Russophobic and militaristic rant. His article is quite purposefully accompaned by a caricature depicting Johnson atop an attack drone.
Seemingly absent-minded that five years ago he professed to be a “committed Russophile” Johnson praises AFU units for their readiness to “kill Russians.”
The bogus “crocodile tears” over staggering Ukrainian losses, however, do not prevent Johnson from coldly stating: the objective of containing Russia (along with China) justifies the “relatively trivial outlay” for sustaining Kiev.
<...>
❗️ Johnson slips up – in his worked-up emotions he notes the presence in Ukraine of “the most powerful modern nationalism” the world has seen. He fails to detect the discrepancy. Although, we should add, the world has Ukrainian nationalism, painstakingly nurtured by the West, to “thank” for scenes of the blazing Trade union house in Odessa, the torchlight processions of the “Azov” butchers in Kiev and the dead women and children of Donbass, killed by AFU fire.
Perhaps Johnson is not familiar with the term “blood PR”. But in fact, this is precisely what he is doing, profiteering from the plight of ordinary Ukrainians, who are sent en masse to their deaths by the criminal Kiev clique on the whim of Western politicos like him.
☝️ A more fitting subject for an essay by the former Prime Minister might be his own role in stoking and manipulating the Ukraine conflict in order to drag out the ignominious end to his odious political career.
Read in full