Најди сличен содржај

Изворен канал @pythonotes · Post #60 · 31 мар.

Вторая по частоте future-функция, которую я использовал, это абсолютный импорт from __future__ import absolute_import Что она делает? Изменения, которые вносит эта инъекция описаны в PEP328 Покажу простой пример. Допустим, есть такой пакет: /my_package /__init__.py /main.py /string.py Смотрим код в my_package/main.py # main.py import string Простой пример готов) Вопрос в том, какой модуль импортируется в данном случае? Есть два варианта: 1. модуль в моём пакете my_package.string 2. стандартный модуль string И вот тут вступает в дело приоритет импортов. В Python2 порядок следующий: помимо иных источников, раньше ищется модуль внутри текущего пакета, а потом в стандартных библиотеках. Таким образом мы импортнём my_package.string. Но в Python3 это поведение изменилось. Если мы указываем просто имя пакета, то ищется именно такой модуль, игнорируя имена в текущем пакете. Если мы хотим импортнуть именно подмодуль из нашего пакета то, мы должны теперь явно это указывать. from my_package import string или относительный импорт, но с указанием пути относительно текущего модуля main from . import string Еще одной неоднозначностью меньше 😎 Подробней про импорты здесь: https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html #2to3#pep#basic

Hashtags

#2to3 #pep #basic

Резултати

Пронајдени 1 слични објави

Пребарај: #fifthamendment

当前筛选 #fifthamendment清除筛选

Crypto M - Crypto News

@CryptoM · Post #64863 · 10.04.2026 г., 05:15

Најди слично Погледај

🚀 Elon Musk's xAI Challenges Colorado's AI Regulations in Court Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI, has initiated legal proceedings against the state of Colorado, aiming to prevent the enforcement of new AI regulations that limit speech from AI chatbots like Grok. According to Cointelegraph, the lawsuit targets Colorado's Senate Bill 24-205, which is designed to safeguard AI users from 'algorithmic discrimination' in sectors such as employment, housing, and finance. In a recent filing to a U.S. district court in Colorado, xAI contended that the state cannot modify the company's message merely to promote its own perspectives on contentious issues like fairness and equity. The company further argued that the legislation, scheduled to be implemented on June 30, is paradoxical as it advocates 'differential treatment' to enhance diversity or address historical discrimination. xAI emphasized that altering Grok would disrupt its objective of being 'maximally truth seeking.' This is not the first instance of xAI challenging state-level AI regulations. In December, the company filed a lawsuit against California concerning its Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act, asserting that the act's disclosure requirements infringe upon the First and Fifth Amendments by compelling speech and exposing trade secrets. Both the Colorado and California laws emerged following allegations that Grok had previously made racist, sexist, and antisemitic remarks. David Sacks, appointed as co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, has advocated for federal oversight of AI regulations, arguing against a fragmented approach by individual states. Sacks highlighted the complexity faced by innovators due to the diverse regulatory frameworks across 50 states, emphasizing the need for a unified federal standard. His appointment aims to address these regulatory challenges and streamline AI governance at the national level. #ElonMusk#xAI#AIregulations#Colorado#lawsuit#Grok#ArtificialIntelligence#algorithmicdiscrimination#GenerativeAI#California#FirstAmendment#FifthAmendment#AIgovernance#federaloversight#technologypolicy

Hashtags

#elonmusk #xai #airegulations #colorado #lawsuit #grok #artificialintelligence #algorithmicdiscrimination #generativeai #california #firstamendment #fifthamendment #aigovernance #federaloversight #technologypolicy