Вторая по частоте future-функция, которую я использовал, это абсолютный импорт
from __future__ import absolute_import
Что она делает?
Изменения, которые вносит эта инъекция описаны в PEP328
Покажу простой пример.
Допустим, есть такой пакет:
/my_package
/__init__.py
/main.py
/string.py
Смотрим код в my_package/main.py
# main.py
import string
Простой пример готов) Вопрос в том, какой модуль импортируется в данном случае? Есть два варианта:
1. модуль в моём пакете my_package.string
2. стандартный модуль string
И вот тут вступает в дело приоритет импортов. В Python2 порядок следующий: помимо иных источников, раньше ищется модуль внутри текущего пакета, а потом в стандартных библиотеках. Таким образом мы импортнём my_package.string.
Но в Python3 это поведение изменилось. Если мы указываем просто имя пакета, то ищется именно такой модуль, игнорируя имена в текущем пакете. Если мы хотим импортнуть именно подмодуль из нашего пакета то, мы должны теперь явно это указывать.
from my_package import string
или относительный импорт, но с указанием пути относительно текущего модуля main
from . import string
Еще одной неоднозначностью меньше 😎
Подробней про импорты здесь:
https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html
#2to3#pep#basic
🪐 In the galaxy SDSS J1356+1026, astronomers have witnessed a colossal bubble of gas over 30,000 light-years wide being blown outward from the galaxy’s core. This bubble is powered by fierce winds from a supermassive black hole as it devours material, creating giant outflows that glow in X-ray and optical light—a real-life example of black holes shaping their host galaxies through dramatic, large-scale eruptions. ✨
#blackhole⚡#outflow⚡#phenomena⚡#nasa⚡#galaxy⚡#stars⚡#astronomy⚡#universe⚡#cosmos⚡#space
👉subscribe Universe Mysteries
👉more Channels
Hyperliquid Faces Major Fund Exodus
🔵 Hyperliquid experienced a massive outflow of approximately $250 million following claims from a researcher about hacks allegedly linked to North Korea. Despite this, Hyperliquid reassured that user funds are secure and no vulnerabilities were found.
Source
#Hyperliquid#Outflow#Hack#NorthKorea#Funds#Security#Crypto#Web3
🚀 XRP Spot ETF Experiences Significant Outflow
According to Odaily, data from SoSoValue indicates that on April 9, Eastern Time, the XRP spot ETF saw a net outflow of $661,200. The 21Shares XRP ETF (TOXR) was the only fund to experience this outflow, contributing to a historical total net outflow of $25.845 million.
As of the time of reporting, the total net asset value of the XRP spot ETF stands at $955 million, with an XRP net asset ratio of 1.15%. The historical cumulative net inflow has reached $1.21 billion.
#XRP#SpotETF#Outflow#Cryptocurrency#21Shares#TOXR#NetAssetValue#CryptoNews
🚀 XRP Spot ETFs See Significant Inflows and Outflows
XRP spot ETFs experienced notable financial movements last week, with a net inflow of $11.75 million, according to Odaily. The data, sourced from SoSoValue, covers the trading days from April 6 to April 10 (Eastern Time).
The Bitwise ETF XRP led the inflows, attracting $9.5154 million, bringing its historical total net inflow to $388 million. Following this, the Franklin ETF XRPZ saw a weekly net inflow of $2.8987 million, with its historical total reaching $324 million.
Conversely, the 21Shares ETF TOXR recorded the highest net outflow, amounting to $661,200, with its historical total net outflow standing at $25.85 million.
As of the latest update, the total net asset value of XRP spot ETFs is $968 million, with an ETF net asset ratio of 1.16% compared to XRP's total market capitalization. The cumulative historical net inflow has reached $1.22 billion.
#XRP#ETFs#Crypto#Inflow#Outflow#Bitwise#Franklin#21Shares#NetAssetValue#MarketCap