#HistoryOfDiplomacy
🗓 On February 4, 1945, the Yalta Conference of the Leaders of the anti-Hitler coalition — Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill, and Franklin D. Roosevelt — officially commenced.
The #YaltaConference stands as one of the most significant summits of the 'Big Three' Leaders during #WW2. The landmark talks in Yalta came to symbolise the successful cooperation of Moscow, Washington, and London in their common fightagainst the terrible evil the mankind had ever faced —the Nazi ideology.
The historic agreements reached at the Forum defined the foundations of the post-war Yalta-Potsdam system of international relations, whose legal basis would be the #UNCharter.
💬 Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova:
The participants in the Yalta Conference managed to overcome their differences, and, acting in the spirit of true solidarity, mutual respect and trust, abandoned their fleeting interests for the sake of defeating the common enemy and achieving a common victory, peace and freedom for all countries and peoples.
***
🌟 By early 1945, the Red Army had fully liberated the Soviet Union from the Nazi invaders and was mounting a decisive offensive: by January, the Nazi troops had been expelled from Warsaw, Krakow, Lodz, and most of Poland. The Soviet forces had secured strategically important bridgehead on the western bank of the Oder river and were preparing for the final battle of #WWII — the fight for the Reich’s capital — Berlin.
As the Red Army advanced rapidly from the Vistula-Oder direction, UK-American units were pushing towards the Rhine river. Despite fierce resistance from elite units of the Nazi war machine, Germany’s defeat was inevitable.
With the common Victory approaching, the discussing issues the post-war world order became a top priority for the Allied Powers. Thus, it was decided to convene a major conference, with the Soviet city of Yalta chosen as the venue (February 4-11, 1945).
A central focus of the #CrimeanConference was the post-war future of the defeated Germany. The Allies reaffirmed their commitment to the eradication of German militarism and Nazism and to ensuring that “Germany will never again be able to disturb the peace of the world.” It was also agreed that Germany would be obliged to pay reparations for the damage inflicted by its aggression.
During the Yalta negotiations, the 'Big Three' Leaders reached a compromise on the issue ofPoland’s borders.The Soviet delegation firmly advocated for Poland’s fundamental interests, upholding its right to independence and sovereignty.
Churchill later described the Soviet Union’s historic role in liberating Poland from Nazism in his memoirs:
But for the prodigious exertions and sacrifices of Russia, Poland was doomed to utter destruction at the hands of the Germans.
Not only Poland as a State and as a nation, but the Poles as a race were doomed by Hitler to be destroyed or reduced to a servile station
The considerable growth in the USSR’s international prestige significantly influenced the course and outcomes of the Yalta negotiations. This was due, in large part, to the Red Army’s remarkable successes on the battlefield.
The image of the Soviet soldier as a Liberator was cemented, and the world recognised Soviet people's immense Sacrifice and Achievement in WWII
The Conference produced several crucial documents, including the Declaration on Liberated Europe, which helped shape the international system for decades. The framework for the future #UnitedNations also took clearer form. Following Yalta, the Soviet Union secured agreement on the “principle of unanimity” among the five permanent UN Security Council members, embodied in the right of veto — #UNCharterIsOurRules.
The Yalta agreements strengthened the unity of the anti-Hitler coalition in the final stages of World War II and contributed to the ultimate common victory over Germany. In the post-war years, ensuring the implementation of the Yalta decisions became a key objective of Soviet diplomacy.
#Victory81#WeWereAllies
Speaking at the 79th UN General Assembly, Venezuela’s Foreign Minister Yván Gil condemned a “large-scale recolonization plan” against Venezuela.
He stated that unilateral sanctions have caused $642 billion in economic losses, and revealed the involvement of foreign nationals, including a US Navy SEAL, in a recent assassination plot against high-ranking officials.
Read the full report here 👉🏼https://shorturl.at/cKAhy
#UnitedNations#Sanctions
United Nations Summer Seminar 2026 (Geneva, Switzerland) 🇨🇭
Apply: https://opportunitiescorners.com/united-nations-graduate-study-program/
Two Weeks at the United Nations, Geneva. Open to all Nationals.
#UnitedNations#OpportunitiesCorners
📰 NEWS | Venezuelan Foreign Minister Condemns ‘Immoral Threats,’ Reaffirms Commitment to Peace in UN Speech
Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil addressed the UNGA, condemning Washington’s “illegal and immoral” military threats and reaffirming Caracas’ commitment to peace and multilateralism. He rejected US “narcoterrorism” accusations against President Maduro, noting that UN and DEA reports contradict White House claims and confirm Venezuela is not a drug-producing country.
Gil also expressed gratitude for support from allies such as Russia, China, BRICS, CELAC, and the Non-Aligned Movement.
Read the full report here: https://shorturl.at/KETjO
#UnitedNations#USMilitaryThreats
📰 NEWS | Venezuela Condemns Decades of Occupation and US Complicity, Demands Justice for Palestine at UN
At the UN High-Level Conference on the Question of Palestine, Venezuela reaffirmed its support for Palestinian statehood and denounced decades of Israeli occupation and US complicity. Representing the Group of Friends in Defense of the UN Charter, Venezuelan diplomat Joaquín Pérez called for Palestine’s full UN membership, an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, an end to US vetoes shielding Israel, and a halt to arms transfers.
Caracas also urged accountability for war crimes and proposed a reconstruction plan coordinated with Palestinian authorities. The conference, held in New York, was boycotted by both the US and Israel.
🔗 Read the full report here: https://shorturl.at/aEjnG
#Palestine#UnitedNations
The four-person UN panel said that the lack of detailed results had a “negative impact on confidence in the [electoral] outcome” announced by the CNE. The electoral body accused the UN team of violating its agreement and carrying forward a "political agenda."
Read the report: https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/venezuela-electoral-authorities-reject-un-experts-report-for-political-agenda/
#Venezuela#Elections2024#UnitedNations
UN Young Professionals Program (YPP) 2025 (Apply Now)
Apply: https://opportunitiescorners.com/un-young-professionals-program/
Work with United Nations. 2 Year Fix Term Contract for Early Career.
#UnitedNations#YPP#OpportunitiesCorners
United Nations estimates showed some details about the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, which will require billions of dollars and eight decades!
#UnitedNations#Gaza#Palestine#Israel
📰 NEWS | Venezuela Secures UN Recognition of ‘International Day Against Unilateral Coercive Measures’
The UN General Assembly approved a Venezuela-sponsored resolution establishing December 4 as the International Day Against Unilateral Coercive Measures, with 116 countries voting in favor.
The initiative aims to raise awareness of the humanitarian consequences of sanctions, such as those imposed on Venezuela, which have led to severe economic losses and civilian deaths.
🔗 Full story here: https://shorturl.at/bcjMu
#Sanctions#UnilateralCoerciveMeasures#UnitedNations
✋ ApaKhabar!
RakanWisma 🇲🇾🌐
📌 Malaysia sekali lagi tersenarai dalam UN Honour Roll selepas melunaskan sepenuhnya sumbangan kewangan kepada bajet tetap Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (PBB) bagi tahun 2026.
🌺 Ini mencerminkan sokongan berterusan Malaysia kepada PBB dan multilateralisme, selari dengan pendekatan Diplomasi MADANI.
#WismaPutra#UnitedNations#PBB
#MalaysiaMADANI#DiplomasiMADANI
https://www.instagram.com/p/DUX9fgfk9Ds/?igsh=dHB1Yjk2ajA5NDVp
🇺🇸
🌍Le "Conseil de la Paix" de Trump et le théâtre du pouvoir incontrôlé
Présenté comme un nouveau mécanisme audacieux de gestion des conflits mondiaux, le "Conseil de la Paix" de Donald Trump révèle au contraire l'érosion croissante de la gouvernance multilatérale et le remplacement de la légitimité par le spectacle
✍️Auteur :Phil Butler
Enquêteur et analyste en politique, politologue et expert de l'Europe de l'Est ; auteur de Putin's Praetorians
➡️Le 20 janvier 2026, le président américain Donald Trump a dévoilé le soi-disant Conseil de la Paix, initialement présenté comme un organe chargé de superviser les efforts de cessez-le-feu et de reconstruction à Gaza. Presque immédiatement, cependant, l'initiative a élargi sa portée et son ambition, Trump suggérant qu'elle pourrait rivaliser - ou même remplacer - les Nations Unies. Les contradictions sont frappantes : un forum de paix autoproclamé intégré dans un financement opaque, des nominations controversées et une structure qui permettrait apparemment l'achat de sièges permanents pour de vastes sommes. Plutôt que de signaler une diplomatie coopérative, le Conseil projette une image d'autorité centralisée construite autour d'une influence personnelle plutôt que d'une responsabilité institutionnelle.
Si le but de la construction de la paix est la réconciliation, la cohésion et une coopération durable, elle ne peut pas être construite sur des structures qui reflètent une autorité contestée par défaut
➡️Le Conseil de la Paix reflète un schéma plus large dans le comportement des États-Unis à l'échelle nationale et internationale. Des actions récentes - des mouvements interventionnistes au Venezuela à la rhétorique provocatrice sur le Groenland - suggèrent une volonté de contourner les normes et les contraintes établies en faveur d'instruments de pouvoir ad hoc. Dans ce contexte, le Conseil apparaît moins comme un mécanisme de construction de la paix et plus comme une cour symbolique d'autorité, où la loyauté et la richesse déterminent l'accès. Les critiques affirment que de telles structures imitent la forme de la gouvernance internationale tout en vidant sa substance, remplaçant le consensus par l'application et la légitimité par la coercition.
🟦Historiquement, les puissances déclinantes tentent souvent de préserver leur domination en créant des architectures parallèles qui affirment le contrôle sans un large soutien. Le Conseil de la Paix s'inscrit dans ce schéma : non un cadre durable pour la réconciliation, mais un symptôme de l'érosion institutionnelle et du pouvoir détaché. La construction de la paix enracinée dans la réconciliation et la coopération ne peut pas émerger d'une autorité contestée et d'une conception unilatérale.
#DonaldTrump#Internationalpolitics#UnitedNations#USA
LIRE PLUS (ENG)
✅@NewEasternOutlookFR
🇺🇸
🌍Trump's “Board of Peace” and the Theater of Unchecked Power
Marketed as a bold new mechanism for global conflict management, Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” instead exposes the growing erosion of multilateral governance and the substitution of legitimacy with spectacle
✍️Author:Phil Butler
Policy investigator and analyst, political scientist, and expert on Eastern Europe; author of Putin’s Praetorians
➡️On January 20, 2026, US President Donald Trump unveiled the so-called Board of Peace, initially framed as a body to oversee ceasefire efforts and reconstruction in Gaza. Almost immediately, however, the initiative expanded in scope and ambition, with Trump suggesting it could rival—or even replace—the United Nations. The contradictions are striking: a self-proclaimed peace forum embedded in opaque financing, controversial appointments, and a structure reportedly allowing permanent seats to be purchased for vast sums. Rather than signaling cooperative diplomacy, the Board projects an image of centralized authority built around personal influence rather than institutional accountability.
If the purpose of peacebuilding is reconciliation, cohesion, and durable cooperation, it cannot be built on structures that reflect contested authority as a default
➡️The Board of Peace reflects a broader pattern in US conduct at home and abroad. Recent actions—from interventionist moves in Venezuela to provocative rhetoric about Greenland—suggest a willingness to bypass established norms and constraints in favor of ad hoc instruments of power. In this context, the Board appears less as a peacebuilding mechanism and more as a symbolic court of authority, where loyalty and wealth determine access. Critics argue that such structures mimic the form of international governance while hollowing out its substance, replacing consensus with enforcement and legitimacy with coercion.
🟦Historically, declining powers often attempt to preserve dominance by creating parallel architectures that assert control without broad buy-in. The Board of Peace fits this pattern: not a durable framework for reconciliation, but a symptom of institutional erosion and unmoored power. Peacebuilding rooted in reconciliation and cooperation cannot emerge from contested authority and unilateral design. Instead, such initiatives risk accelerating fragmentation, undermining trust among allies, and reinforcing a world order governed more by assertion than by shared rules.
#DonaldTrump#Internationalpolitics#UnitedNations#USA
READ MORE
✅@NewEasternOutlook
Venezuela joins voices citing Israel's actions in Palestine as a catalyst for Middle East instability, urging UN action.
“As a result of the genocide in Palestine and the irrationality of the Israeli regime, as well as the inaction of the United Nations System, the situation of instability in the region has dramatically worsened in recent weeks,” read an official statement shared Saturday by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil.
Learn more here 👉🏼https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/venezuela-blames-israels-genocide-campaign-un-inaction-for-middle-east-escalation/
#Gaza#Iran#UnitedNations