静态网站悖论
个人网站的两种不同实现方式:一种是复杂的内容管理系统(CMS),另一种是简单的静态 HTML 文件。文章指出,尽管大多数普通用户倾向于使用复杂的解决方案(如 WordPress),但实际上,只有少数专业软件工程师能够选择更简单的静态网站。
via HackerNews 2024 10 09
前两天刚好听朋友说 square space 已经涨到了近乎搞笑的 $25 月费,做不用来盈利的个人博客实在难以 justify。这篇文章中吐槽得很在点子上:
normal users are stuck with a bunch of greedy clowns that make them pay for every little thing, all while wasting ungodly amounts of computational power to render what could have been a static website in 99% of cases.
普通用户被困在了一群屁大点功能都要收费的贪婪小丑手里,与此同时浪费着人神共愤额度的算力来渲染 99% 的情况下都可以作为静态的网站。
当然原文中说的“只有少数专业软件工程师才能选择更简单的静态网站”略微夸张并不认同,因为静态站至少是比 self-host 的动态 CMS 少太多维护了。我的 backlog 里也一直躺了篇安利新手用静态站并拉踩 WP 的文,不过网上这种文已经有无数了也还是拦不住前赴后继往各种 CMS 的坑里冲的新手,觉得写了又有什么意义呢就还搁着没写。(当然迟早会像以前反复造的无数轮子一样被废话欲战胜的 but not today)
#indieblog#newletter
A whale is facing potential liquidations of 488.45 $WBTC($26.47M) on #Compound, with a health rate as low as 1.07 and a liquidation price of $50,429.
This whale was liquidated 3 times during the 2022 price crash, with a total of 74,426 $cWBTC($32.82M) being liquidated.
Address:
0xceef57f6c40a7cb2392eaad101ee0440aa43ba42
Lookonchain | ꘜ
Whales are accumulating $LINK.
Whale 0x3c9E withdrew 510,000 $LINK($11.13M) from #Binance over the past 2 days and deposited it into #Compound.
0x42A1 spent $1.34M to buy 59,560 $LINK 4 hours ago.
0x848a spent $1M to buy 44,846 $LINK 5 hours ago.
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3c9Ea5C4Fec2A77E23Dd82539f4414266Fe8f757
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x42A1Cf900c55EC4eBC885eB870A8E1d2E2FA1727
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x848aA08a594a14664685e7bbB3a00E38Faba4F2f