TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← Find Blog👁发现博客

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

查找相似内容

Source channel @FindBlog · Post #521 · 10月9日

静态网站悖论 个人网站的两种不同实现方式:一种是复杂的内容管理系统(CMS),另一种是简单的静态 HTML 文件。文章指出,尽管大多数普通用户倾向于使用复杂的解决方案(如 WordPress),但实际上,只有少数专业软件工程师能够选择更简单的静态网站。 via HackerNews 2024 10 09 前两天刚好听朋友说 square space 已经涨到了近乎搞笑的 $25 月费,做不用来盈利的个人博客实在难以 justify。这篇文章中吐槽得很在点子上: normal users are stuck with a bunch of greedy clowns that make them pay for every little thing, all while wasting ungodly amounts of computational power to render what could have been a static website in 99% of cases. 普通用户被困在了一群屁大点功能都要收费的贪婪小丑手里,与此同时浪费着人神共愤额度的算力来渲染 99% 的情况下都可以作为静态的网站。 当然原文中说的“只有少数专业软件工程师才能选择更简单的静态网站”略微夸张并不认同,因为静态站至少是比 self-host 的动态 CMS 少太多维护了。我的 backlog 里也一直躺了篇安利新手用静态站并拉踩 WP 的文,不过网上这种文已经有无数了也还是拦不住前赴后继往各种 CMS 的坑里冲的新手,觉得写了又有什么意义呢就还搁着没写。(当然迟早会像以前反复造的无数轮子一样被废话欲战胜的 but not today) #indieblog#newletter

Results

找到 5 条相似帖子

搜索 #digitalpolicy

当前筛选 #digitalpolicy清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #802 · 2026/04/08 07:04

🇪🇺EU AI Act FAQ Updated with Guidance on Agentic AI The European Commission’s AI Act Service Desk added a new section on agentic AI to its FAQ guide under the AI Pact. The update introduces key definitions related to “AI agents” and “agentic AI” and outlines how such systems are addressed within the AI Act framework. The guidance highlights that existing AI Act provisions apply to agentic AI, with particular emphasis on Article 5(1) prohibitions concerning harmful manipulation and exploitation of vulnerabilities, identifying these rules as especially relevant for this category of systems. #AIRegulation#EUAIAct#AgenticAI#AIgovernance#DigitalPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #636 · 2025/08/15 07:04

🇩🇪Germany’s Digital Minister Calls for a Leaner, More Innovation-Friendly AI Act Germany’s Federal Minister for Digital Transformation and Government Modernisation, Karsten Wildberger, has voiced sharp concerns over the EU AI Act, describing it as “overloaded and too complex.” Speaking to Euractiv, he argued that while addressing risks is essential, the current regulatory framework imposes excessive bureaucracy that could hinder innovation. Wildberger backed the European Commission’s plan to create AI training hubs, or “gigafactories,” as a step toward strengthening Europe’s technological capacity. His position underscores a tension within EU policymaking—balancing robust safeguards with an enabling environment for AI development. #AIRegulation#EUAIAct#Germany#DigitalPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #806 · 2026/04/14 07:04

📖How Metaphors Shape AI Regulation A research paper by the Centre for Digital Ethics (CEDE), “The Artificial in ‘Artificial Intelligence’: How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation,” examines how metaphorical language influences legal and regulatory approaches to AI. Drawing on cognitive linguistics, the paper argues that concepts such as “intelligence,” “black box,” and “hallucination” are not neutral descriptors but frameworks that shape how risks, responsibility, and authority are understood. The authors highlight that legal interpretation relies on language with normative force, meaning these metaphors can steer regulatory outcomes and create path dependence. For example, “intelligence” encourages anthropomorphism, “black box” narrows focus to the model rather than the broader system, and “hallucinations” mischaracterize predictable errors as anomalies. The paper proposes reframing such errors as design-related risks arising from system features and interaction dynamics. #AIRegulation#AIethics#LegalTheory#AIGovernance#DigitalPolicy

AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #796 · 2026/03/31 07:04

🇪🇺EU Rights Bodies Warn on AI Act Amendments in Digital Omnibus Equinet and ENNHRI issued a joint statement raising concerns over proposed amendments to the AI Act within the Digital Omnibus package. The organizations state that changes are being advanced without sufficient impact assessments or public consultation, potentially affecting fundamental rights protections. They also highlight that the AI Act only entered into force on 1 August 2024, with most obligations applying from 2 August 2026, making meaningful assessment of its effects premature. The statement stresses the European Commission’s obligations under EU Treaties and Better Regulation Guidelines to ensure transparent consultation and evidence-based policymaking. It also warns that simplifying regulation based on company size rather than AI system risk could have systemic consequences, given the dominance of SMEs and Small Mid-Caps in the EU economy. Equinet and ENNHRI recommend preserving core safeguards, including AI system registration, powers of fundamental rights authorities, high-risk system timelines, strict necessity standards, AI literacy obligations, and key information requirements. They also oppose weakening GDPR definitions of personal data and proposed changes to automated decision-making rules. #AIRegulation#EUAIAct#FundamentalRights#DigitalPolicy#GDPR