静态网站悖论
个人网站的两种不同实现方式:一种是复杂的内容管理系统(CMS),另一种是简单的静态 HTML 文件。文章指出,尽管大多数普通用户倾向于使用复杂的解决方案(如 WordPress),但实际上,只有少数专业软件工程师能够选择更简单的静态网站。
via HackerNews 2024 10 09
前两天刚好听朋友说 square space 已经涨到了近乎搞笑的 $25 月费,做不用来盈利的个人博客实在难以 justify。这篇文章中吐槽得很在点子上:
normal users are stuck with a bunch of greedy clowns that make them pay for every little thing, all while wasting ungodly amounts of computational power to render what could have been a static website in 99% of cases.
普通用户被困在了一群屁大点功能都要收费的贪婪小丑手里,与此同时浪费着人神共愤额度的算力来渲染 99% 的情况下都可以作为静态的网站。
当然原文中说的“只有少数专业软件工程师才能选择更简单的静态网站”略微夸张并不认同,因为静态站至少是比 self-host 的动态 CMS 少太多维护了。我的 backlog 里也一直躺了篇安利新手用静态站并拉踩 WP 的文,不过网上这种文已经有无数了也还是拦不住前赴后继往各种 CMS 的坑里冲的新手,觉得写了又有什么意义呢就还搁着没写。(当然迟早会像以前反复造的无数轮子一样被废话欲战胜的 but not today)
#indieblog#newletter
#rant Pydantic sucks ass, it simply cannot express 'optional field' without workarounds
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60191270/python-pydantic-how-to-have-an-optional-field-but-if-present-required-to-con
https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/1223
就是说始祖鸟炸山这个这么脑残的行为连非户外品牌都不应该犯这种低级错误啊但凡有个 marketing/integrity/PR 部门都得 push back 吧这么大的花钱自毁形象找骂项目竟然能在一个户外品牌过审甭管是不是暴发户控股都匪夷所思啊(项目本身品味多土是另一个话题了),再次印证全公司上下屎山没有人真正 care 或者对领导说不的草台本质……
#rant
#review#rant
You see how we think we chase that person in our life who we think is special, how we are always looking for ways so that they can look back at us in the same way we look at them, they feel for us same way we feel for them... And they don't. After which we feel we are a fool for chasing them and we think they enjoy or show apathy towards our situation...
Guess what.. Everyone's fool for someone. They are not looking at us the way we look at them because they are looking at someone else the way we look at them and perhaps that someone is hoping to catch someone else's attention... And the chain goes on.
I would be too crass to say that everyone's someone's bitch.
#The_Lost_Poet