Rclone Remount Remount cloud storage locally during boot via rclone & fusermount directly on your Android powered smart device. Virtually limitless storage expansion with support for dozens of cloud providers including Dropbox, GDrive, OneDrive, SFTP & many more. Extremely useful for devices without physical storage expansion capabilities. Also great for streaming large media files without need for full caching. Binaries compiled using Termux. Features: Support for arm, arm64, & x86 Huge list of supported cloud storage providers Apps with ability to specify paths can access /mnt/cloud/ Most file explorers work just fine (issue #9) Mount points use names of remote(s) in rclone.conf Specify custom rclone params for each remote via /sdcard/.rclone/.REMOTE.param Access remotes via http://127.0.0.1:38762 Access remotes via ftp://127.0.0.1:38763 Mount bind to /sdcard/ (see issue #5) Support for Work Profiles https://github.com/Magisk-Modules-Repo/com.piyushgarg.rclone #rclone#remount#cloud#alternatives
静态网站悖论 个人网站的两种不同实现方式：一种是复杂的内容管理系统（CMS），另一种是简单的静态 HTML 文件。文章指出，尽管大多数普通用户倾向于使用复杂的解决方案（如 WordPress），但实际上，只有少数专业软件工程师能够选择更简单的静态网站。 via HackerNews 2024 10 09 前两天刚好听朋友说 square space 已经涨到了近乎搞笑的 $25 月费，做不用来盈利的个人博客实在难以 justify。这篇文章中吐槽得很在点子上： normal users are stuck with a bunch of greedy clowns that make them pay for every little thing, all while wasting ungodly amounts of computational power to render what could have been a static website in 99% of cases. 普通用户被困在了一群屁大点功能都要收费的贪婪小丑手里，与此同时浪费着人神共愤额度的算力来渲染 99% 的情况下都可以作为静态的网站。 当然原文中说的“只有少数专业软件工程师才能选择更简单的静态网站”略微夸张并不认同，因为静态站至少是比 self-host 的动态 CMS 少太多维护了。我的 backlog 里也一直躺了篇安利新手用静态站并拉踩 WP 的文，不过网上这种文已经有无数了也还是拦不住前赴后继往各种 CMS 的坑里冲的新手，觉得写了又有什么意义呢就还搁着没写。（当然迟早会像以前反复造的无数轮子一样被废话欲战胜的 but not today） #indieblog#newletter
Hashtags
找到 1 条相似帖子
搜索 #remount