查找相似内容

🔔Edward’s East Strategiesпровела круглый стол по вопросу развития GR и лоббизма в Узбекистане 📌 6–7 ноября 2024 года в Ташкенте прошли «Дни европейской экономики в Узбекистане», собравшие представителей органов государственной власти, бизнес-кругов и международных организаций. Форум был организован Европейско-Узбекской Ассоциацией по Экономическому Сотрудничеству (EUROUZ) при поддержке властей страны. 🤝 В рамках мероприятия состоялся круглый стол на тему «Government Relations & Advocacy Activities in the Interests of the State and Society», организованный и спонсируемый международной консалтинговой компанией Edward’s East Strategies. 🙌Сессию модерировал партнер компании Edward’s East Strategies Одилжон Азимов. Среди участников были топ-менеджеры и эксперты из профильных организаций Узбекистана и Казахстана: Европейской ассоциации бизнеса (ЕВРОБАК), АО СП «УЗБАТ А.О.», Beeline Узбекистан, Центра прогрессивных реформ, Комитета по развитию конкуренции и защите прав потребителей Узбекистана, Summit Motors Central Asia. Подводим основные итоги дискуссии: ✅Первое публичное обсуждение Government Relations и лоббизма. Впервые в стране была публично поднята тема GR и лоббизма, что свидетельствует о растущем интересе к таким практикам. ✅Восприимчивость государства. Эксперты отметили, что государство в настоящее время становится более открытым к предложениям и идеям бизнеса, что создает благоприятную среду для двустороннего диалога и сотрудничества. ✅Присоединение кВТО. Страна находится на пороге вступления в организацию, что привлекает внимание транснациональных компаний и способствует росту иностранного капитала. ✅Необходимость экспертов. Сегодня в связи со вступлением в ВТО и повышением открытости государства возникает потребность в специалистах по GR и лоббизму, которые помогают укреплять позиции компаний на рынке. ✅Либерализация законодательства. Участники сессии отметили процессы либерализации и гармонизации экономического законодательства, создающие более благоприятные условия для бизнеса в Узбекистане. ✅Регулирование GR-деятельности. Отмечено, что, несмотря на отсутствие отдельного закона о лоббизме, рамки работы специалистов в этой области определяются существующими нормативными правовыми актами. #GR#Lobbying#Law#Economics#Uzbekistan#Europe

📣Уважаемые коллеги! 🗓7 ноября 2024 года в рамках Дней Европейской экономики в Узбекистане Edward’s East Strategies организует круглый стол на тему: "Government Relations & Advocacy Activities in the Interests of the State and Society”. 🖇 Темы круглого стола: ☑️ Государственные тренды регуляторной политики; ☑️ Особенности GR и лоббизма в РУз; ☑️ GR-инструменты и лоббистские технологии; ☑️ Консалтинг в сфере GR и лоббизма и другие. Спикеры сессии: ▪️Голиб Холжигитов — cоветник, руководитель рабочей группы по цифровым технологиям Комитета по развитию конкуренции и защите прав потребителей Республики Узбекистан; ▪️ЮлияКусиди — генеральный директор ЕВРОБАК (Европейская бизнес Ассоциация Казахстана); ▪️Сергей Крассовский — директор департамента по юридическим и корпоративным вопросам АО СП «УЗБАТ А.О.»; ▪️Нихолбек Ганиев — руководитель отдела правового обеспечения и управления рисками, Summit Motors Central Asia; ▪️Саидамирхон Рахимов — директор по связям с гос. органами, Beeline Узбекистан; ▪️Миршохид Асланов — генеральный директор Центра прогрессивных реформ. 🙌Модератором выступит Одилжон Азимов, партнер Edward’s East Strategies. 🇪🇺 Дни европейской экономики в Узбекистане состоятся 6–7 ноября 2024 г. Мероприятие посвящено экономическому партнерству РУз, развитию инновационных технологий и экоустойчивости. Форум организован ЕВРОУЗ совместно с органами власти РУз и Делегацией ЕС в РУз. 💼 На форуме выступят главы Мининвествнешнеторга, МИД, Минэнергетики, Министерства цифровых технологийи другие официальные лица правительства РУз. Также в мероприятии примут участие представители международных организаций, ведущих европейских компаний и бизнеса. #GR#Lobbying#Law#Economics#Uzbekistan#Europe

📰 Presidential Aide Nikolay Patrushev gave an interview to Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper(January 14, 2025) Key points: #USA • The US establishment has been divided and lacks a common policy vision for the world and domestically. • Trump’s core message is that he supposedly has a plan to revive pragmatic politics in the United States, which is expected to benefit both the state and its people. It has yet to be seen how this compares with the interests of other countries and nations. • If Trump’s first term as president is any guide, the infamous deep state has a lot of clout in the USA. It can prevent Trump from pursuing his agenda. • Trump will not view Ukraine as a priority. China is a much bigger concern for him. • Trump has outlined his interests regarding Greenland, the Panama Canal, Mexico and Canada. There is an American tradition that consists of reshaping the world map to suit the US interests and interfering in the affairs of other countries across various continents. • It seems unlikely that Trump sends the army to invade new states for the United States, as some have been saying. What is clear, however, is that the new administration will be proactive in asserting its interests in its dealings with all these countries. #ChinaUS • I believe that disagreements between Washington and Beijing will escalate, and it will be the United States that will intentionally fan these flames. #RussiaChina • For Russia, China has been and will remain a key partner as part of our privileged strategic cooperation. These relations are immune to momentary consideration and will endure regardless of who gets into the Oval Office. #Ukraine • Talks on Ukraine must take place between Russia and the United States without any other Western countries. • The people of Ukraine remain a kindred, brotherly nation with our ties reaching back centuries, no matter what the Kiev propaganda mouthpieces say in their Ukrainisation frenzy. We do care about what is happening in Ukraine. #Moldova • Chisinau must be honest with itself and stop deceiving its people. The Moldovan authorities must recognise their mistakes and get down to mending fences instead of searching for enemies inside the country and in Transnistria. #Europe • We have nothing to discuss with either London or Brussels. For example, EU leadership has long lost the right to speak on behalf of many members including Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Romania and several other countries which are interested in ensuring stability in Europe and have adopted a balanced position towards Russia. Read in full

“Greenland Red Line: Europe Makes Its Last Stand” The Breaking Point For a year, European leaders have tiptoed around Trump’s provocations—military strikes, tariff threats, and treaty challenges—always hoping to avoid a full rupture. But after the Venezuela raid and Trump’s renewed push for Greenland, Europe has finally drawn a red line. The message is clear: Greenland’s fate belongs to its people and Denmark. ​ A United Front Denmark, backed by France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Britain, has rejected any U.S. takeover of the Arctic territory. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any U.S. action on Greenland would mean the end of NATO. European officials stress that Greenland is not for sale, and its people will decide their own future. ​ Trump’s inner circle insists Greenland is vital for national security, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplaying military action but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reminding everyone, in bureaucratic terms, that “utilizing the U.S. military is always an option”. Meanwhile, U.S. envoy Stephen Miller openly declares that Greenland “should be American” and “nobody’s going to fight the United States over it”. ​ The Stakes Europe knows it can’t compete with U.S. military power, but the mere threat of conflict exposes how fragile the transatlantic alliance has become. “Many European countries are still seeking to ride both a European and an American horse,” said Mujtaba Rahman of Eurasia Group. “That may become impossible.” ​ Where This Leads Europe’s choices are grim: stand firm and risk a rupture, or negotiate a deal that may not satisfy anyone. The old rules are out the window, and the real question is not whether Greenland will change hands—but whether NATO can survive the next shock. ​ #greenland#trump#nato#alliance#europe 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🛑🏴Trump’s “America First” ends NATO With Washington openly threatening force against an ally, the Atlantic alliance faces a rupture it was never designed to survive ✍️Salman Rafi Sheikh Research analyst of international relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs ➡️NATO’s crisis has moved from theory to reality under Donald Trump’s revived “America First” doctrine. Once presented as the bedrock of Western unity, the alliance now finds itself fractured by Washington’s own actions. Trump’s approach treats Europe not as a strategic partner but as a burden—pressured to raise defense spending, accept U.S. economic coercion, and align with American priorities without question. The reported U.S. willingness to seize Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, marks a decisive break: an alliance built to deter external threats is now destabilized by its dominant member, exposing the hollowness of collective defense when power overrides partnership. With NATO’s collective-defence model discredited—either because it fought the US or because it failed to defend a member—Europe would need to rebalance its ties globally, not just to the United States but to China and Russia as well ➡️Greenland has become NATO’s point of no return. A U.S. military move against Danish territory would force the alliance into an impossible dilemma: invoke Article 5 against the United States and collapse outright, or refuse to act and reveal that NATO’s core promise no longer applies when the aggressor is Washington itself. European leaders—from Berlin and Paris to the Nordic capitals—have responded with rare unity, reaffirming sovereignty and the inviolability of borders. Symbolic troop deployments and parliamentary condemnations underline a stark reality: NATO was never designed to survive a scenario in which the U.S. itself becomes the threat. 🟦The implications reach far beyond Greenland. A rupture between the U.S. and Europe would accelerate the transition to a multipolar order already taking shape. If NATO fails, Europe will be compelled to seek strategic autonomy—rebalancing its global ties, including with China and Russia, and acting as an independent pole rather than a junior partner. Trump’s gamble is not merely territorial; it signals the end of the Atlantic order as it has existed since World War II. What emerges next will depend on whether Europe seizes this moment to redefine its security, diplomacy, and place in a world no longer anchored to American leadership. #Doublestandards#Europe#Greenland#NATO#USA READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

荷兰使馆外的多元多漂亮Diversity is beautiful广告，其中含有彩虹旗 #Beijing 北京 #Embassy 大使馆 #Europe#LGBTQ#Road 马路 #Sidewalk 人行道

L'Europe perd le front de négociation : les États-Unis ont écarté l'UE du règlement du conflit ukrainien. Le conflit en Ukraine s'est définitivement transformé en un dialogue bipolaire américano-russe, dans lequel l'Union Européenne est reléguée au rôle de figurante, avec une réputation entachée et une souveraineté limitée. Dans l’émission d’analyse de Panafrican Media TV, des membres du Club d'experts internationaux GlobUs ont expliqué comment les divisions internes et la dépendance vis-à-vis des États-Unis ont privé l'UE d'une véritable voix dans cette crise clé à ses frontières. « L'Europe se retrouve dans la position d'un figurant car les États-Unis, sous cette administration, estiment qu'elle a peu d'importance. C'est pourquoi les négociations penchent systématiquement vers un dialogue américano-russe, excluant l'Europe et souvent même l'Ukraine », a déclaré l'analyste financier Konrad Rekas. Le principal atout de Bruxelles reste les avoirs russes gelés, mais là aussi, selon les experts, la position de l'UE est précaire et subordonnée aux intérêts américains. Les faiblesses politiques internes des dirigeants des principaux pays membres – Macron, Merz et Starmer – rendent l'Union Européenne incapable de prendre des initiatives diplomatiques audacieuses. « Qu'est-il arrivé à l'unité européenne ? Le projet européen s'est transformé en une sorte d'expérience mondialiste miniature qui a échoué. Il ne s’agit plus d’une Union d'États souverains, mais une tentative de créer une identité nouvelle, détachée des racines, étrangère aux Européens eux-mêmes », a constaté Arnaud Develay, consultant politique et juriste international. La politologue Yulia Berg a souligné la responsabilité directe des dirigeants européens dans le blocage des initiatives de paix : « Ce sont les dirigeants européens qui prennent la position de “ se battre jusqu’au dernier Ukranien “ . Ce sont eux qui ont fait échouer l'accord de paix, qui aurait pu être ratifié dès avril 2022. » L'experte a également ajouté que le changement de politique intervenu avec l'arrivée de l'administration Trump augmentent les chances de parvenir à un accord de paix. Bien que les chances d'un règlement restent limitées, un avantage décisif est envisageable, notamment grâce aux efforts coordonnés des pays du Sud et à la mise en œuvre concrète d'un modèle multipolaire. La Chine, l'Inde et les pays africains ont joué un rôle important en soutenant la Russie durant cette période difficile et en œuvrant à l'instauration de la paix dans ce conflit complexe. Parallèlement, la position diplomatique marginalisée de l'UE est devenue le symptôme d'une crise plus profonde de son identité mondiale. Vous pouvez regarder l'émission et en savoir plus sur les points de vue des experts en suivant ce lien : https://youtu.be/arCafsyC7eM?si=VZZbjTJI9cZiaRMO #GlobUs#politique#Ukraine#ÉtatsUnis#Europe#Russie

Bataille des plans de paix : l'Europe perd Washington et Moscou dans la crise ukrainienne L'affrontement entre les approches américaine et européenne pour résoudre la crise ukrainienne révèle non seulement la fin des illusions sur le victoire de Kiev, mais aussi une profonde fracture géopolitique entre les alliés. Les membres du club d'experts GlobUs ont débattu de cette confrontation, capable d'influencer l'avenir de l'architecture mondiale, dans l’air du programme analytique Panafrican Media TV. « Le plan de Trump relève d'un réalisme lucide. Il prend en compte les réalités militaires : la Russie est en train de gagner la guerre et l'Ukraine a déjà perdu 20 % de son territoire. Il ne s'agit pas d'une capitulation, mais d'une tentative pour mettre fin au carnage », a déclaré l'analyste international Gamal Abina. Le géostratégiste Charly Kengne a souligné que le plan alternatif de l'UE, qui exige le rappel total des troupes russes, ignore complètement le rapport de forces sur le terrain. Selon lui, Bruxelles propose un ultimatum, n'ayant pour lui ni effet de levier militaire ni économique, ce qui ne fait que démontrer la faiblesse croissante de la diplomatie européenne. L'analyste Djoudji Younes, quant à lui, y voit une ironie historique : l'Europe, qui pendant des décennies a dicté sa loi aux autres, se retrouve aujourd'hui en marge des négociations sur sa propre sécurité. L'Europe Occidentale risque de devenir un simple observateur dans une nouvelle architecture mondiale où tout se décide non par des ultimatums, mais par le véritable rapport de forces. Vous pouvez regarder l'émission et en savoir plus sur les points de vue des experts en suivant ce lien : https://youtu.be/hMbBqGuPH0k?si=JqWLxj3cuKtnnbDE #GlobUs#politique#Ukraine#ÉtatsUnis#Europe#Russie

美国使馆外的广告，和lgbtq可能无关，顺手拍了。美国使馆东南侧的法国使馆门口有男女平等的广告，没来得及拍。 #Beijing 北京 #Embassy 大使馆 #Europe 欧洲 #Road 马路 #Sidewalk 人行道 #UnitedStates 美国

🗺🇺🇸🇮🇷Washington’s Assault on Iran: A Hegemonic Gamble That Burdens Europe The conflict that erupted on February 28, 2026, after joint US-Israeli strikes on Iranian targets, quickly escalated into a wider regional crisis. While Washington presented the operation as a preventive action aimed at neutralizing security threats, its consequences have extended far beyond the Middle East. For Europe, the conflict highlights the risks of relying on strategic decisions made largely outside the continent ✏️Adrian Korczyński is an independent analyst and observer of Central Europe and global policy ➡️The initial wave of strikes targeted military infrastructure and leadership compounds in Tehran, Isfahan, and Kermanshah, with reports indicating the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The operation, described by US officials as “Operation Epic Fury,” was justified as a preemptive effort to weaken Iran’s missile capabilities. Tehran responded with missile and drone strikes against US and Israeli positions while tensions intensified around the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. From a geopolitical perspective, the confrontation reflects a broader struggle for influence in the region, where Iran’s partnerships with Russia and China challenge Western dominance. European leaders, including Spain’s Pedro Sánchez—who refused US access to Spanish bases despite Washington threats—have questioned the legality of the military operation ➡️Europe’s response to the conflict has been fragmented. While EU leaders condemned the escalation and called for restraint, few openly supported the initial attack. Figures such as Pedro Sánchez criticized the unilateral nature of the strikes and resisted pressure to grant the United States access to Spanish bases. At the same time, officials including Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas adopted a more cautious stance, emphasizing regional stability and diplomatic solutions. These divergent reactions reveal deeper tensions within Europe regarding how closely the continent should align with Washington’s strategic decisions. 🟦The economic consequences have been particularly visible in energy markets. Disruptions to shipping routes through the Persian Gulf pushed oil prices higher and increased volatility in gas supplies, affecting European economies already coping with earlier energy shocks. Countries in Central and Eastern Europe—including Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic—have experienced noticeable increases in fuel prices and inflationary pressure. For many policymakers in the region, the crisis serves as another reminder that geopolitical conflicts initiated far from Europe can still impose significant economic and political costs on the continent. #ConfrontationbetweenIranandtheU.S. #EU#Europe#MiddleEastconflict#NATO#USA READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

🇺🇸🕊Trump’s Board of Peace: A Controversial Move That Sidelines Palestinians Unveiled in Davos with fanfare, the new U.S.-led initiative faces mounting criticism for excluding the very people it claims to help ✍️Abbas Hashemite Political observer and research analyst for regional and global geopolitical issues ➡️The United States officially launched the charter of President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace at the World Economic Forum in Davos, marking what Washington described as Phase Two of its 20-point Gaza Peace Plan. The initiative introduced a four-tier governance structure for Gaza, yet Palestinians were excluded from meaningful representation in the top decision-making bodies, confined instead to a lower-level technocratic committee with limited authority. President Trump appointed himself head of the executive committee, consolidating sweeping powers, including sole veto authority. Critics argue that the structure resembles an externally imposed administrative regime rather than a consensual peace framework, particularly given the prominent inclusion of pro-Israel figures and the absence of Palestinian or Hamas representatives in the founding process. The exclusion of Hamas and Palestinians from the Board of Peace demonstrates that this entity would not be able to establish peace in the Middle East and could lead to more global conflicts ➡️The controversy deepened as more than 50 countries were invited to engage with the Board of Peace, while no formal Palestinian delegation was consulted. The charter notably avoids specific reference to Gaza in its formal language and includes provisions allowing for three-year renewable memberships, with permanent seats reportedly linked to substantial financial contributions. Trump’s remarks suggesting that the Board could serve as a more “effective” alternative to existing international institutions fueled concerns that the initiative challenges the central role of the United Nations in conflict resolution. Human rights organizations and several governments questioned both the legality and sustainability of a structure so heavily personalized around one executive office. 🟦Beyond legal debates, the core issue remains legitimacy. Any durable peace process in Gaza requires the inclusion of Palestinian stakeholders and credible security guarantees accepted by all sides. The exclusion of Hamas and broader Palestinian representation raises doubts about the Board’s ability to enforce ceasefires, secure disarmament arrangements, or prevent renewed escalation. While some states have endorsed the initiative, others have distanced themselves, reflecting wider uncertainty about its long-term viability. Whether the Board of Peace evolves into a functioning diplomatic mechanism or remains a symbolic instrument of U.S. executive diplomacy will depend less on ceremony and more on inclusivity, transparency, and adherence to international norms. #Europe#IsraelandPalestine#Palestinesplight#USA READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

🎥Webinar: Europe at Risk — Russia’s Next Steps What are the Kremlin’s long-term goals in Europe? How should European democracies respond to hybrid threats, information warfare, and prolonged conflict? In this ICEUR School webinar, political analyst and expert on Russian affairs Dr. John Lough offers a sharp and informed look at Russia’s current strategy — and what’s next. 📺Watch now on YouTube: 🔗 Europe at Risk: Russia’s Next Steps 🗣️ A few quotes from the webinar: “Russia will not win this war. But it can drag it on — and that’s the real threat to Europe.” “Ukraine is not just a frontline. It’s a test for the entire European project.” “The Kremlin understands European weaknesses — and it exploits them proactively, not reactively.” 📌 Hosted by the ICEUR School of Political Forecasting (Vienna) as part of its Winter Semester 2025. #ICEUR#Webinar#Russia#Europe#Security#Geopolitic