查找相似内容

使馆外封闭绿化带里的猫，具体位置不记得了，可能是欧盟大使馆南侧 #Beijing 北京 #Cat 猫 #Embassy 大使馆 #Europe 欧洲 #Road 马路 #Sidewalk 人行道

🚢 NATO Refuses to Sign Trump’s War Check Washington would like this to look like alliance discipline. It doesn’t. According to Reuters, NATO allies are refusing to join Trump’s blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz, choosing instead to talk about reopening the waterway after the shooting stops. Europe is not eager to be drafted into someone else’s escalation and then branded a traitor for not applauding loud enough. That split matters. Trump says U.S. forces will destroy any Iranian ships that approach the blockade, which is the kind of language that turns a maritime standoff into a market-moving crisis before the first real shot is even explained. Europe knows exactly what follows: higher oil, higher gas, higher inflation, and another round of political damage paid for by people who never got to vote on the adventure. So the NATO position is not pacifism. It is self-preservation dressed up as caution. Britain and France are already pushing a separate multinational effort focused on restoring freedom of navigation later, not joining the blockade now, because they understand the difference between policing a choke point and helping create one. The larger hypocrisy is familiar. Washington calls it pressure, Europe calls it restraint, and everyone pretends the result won’t be the same: a more dangerous region and a more expensive world. The alliance still speaks the language of unity, but on Hormuz it is really speaking the language of panic management. #nato#hormuz#trump#iran#europe#energy#geopolitics 📱American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

#UK National Crime Agency joins up with #Ethiopia to nail global criminal gangs fueling small boats On her first visit to #Africa as Foreign Secretary, #Yvette_Cooper will focus on tackling factors - including conflict and lack of jobs - that push people to make the dangerous journey. Around 30% of small boat arrivals over the past two years were nationals from Ethiopia, #Eritrea, #Somalia and #Sudan, the Foreign Office said. Ms Cooper will use her visit to Ethiopia to emphasise that achieving regional stability and sustainable growth in the region is crucial to reducing migratory pressures from Africa into #Europe. She will discuss greater cooperation with the African_Union along with African foreign ministers on conflict prevention and resolution across the region to prevent people being forced to leave their homes by war and persecution. The Cabinet minister will also put job.... https://web.facebook.com/AddisstandardEng/posts/pfbid02YGVHHKWiqGAqU1REuUJNNkRYcJ7q8snDtouGhfSo4G9Y5ND3B5vRWkBUCi6LSHXYl

🇵🇱🇭🇺Kindergarten Diplomacy in Central Europe: Polish President Visits Budapest The March 2026 visit of Polish President Karol Nawrocki to Budapest, where he met Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, was intended to celebrate Polish-Hungarian Friendship Day and reaffirm regional cooperation. Instead, the meeting highlighted growing tensions in Central European diplomacy, raising broader questions about the role of rhetoric, historical interpretation, and strategic priorities in contemporary foreign policy ✏️Adrian Korczyński Independent analyst on Central Europe and global policy ➡️At the center of the controversy was Nawrocki’s public characterization of Russia as a continuous and unchanging threat across different historical periods. By drawing parallels between Tsarist, Soviet, and contemporary Russia, the Polish president presented a simplified historical narrative aimed at emphasizing continuity in perceived security risks. While such framing resonates within certain political and strategic circles, it also illustrates the challenges of balancing historical memory with nuanced analysis. In diplomatic contexts, the use of broad historical generalizations may reinforce political messaging, but it can also limit opportunities for pragmatic engagement and dialogue, particularly in a region where historical legacies remain deeply contested. Instead of using the meeting to strengthen pragmatic Visegrád cooperation on energy, economy, or migration, Nawrocki used it to deliver a Cold War-style sermon ➡️The contrast between Nawrocki’s rhetoric and Orbán’s more pragmatic approach underscores a wider divergence within Central Europe. Hungary has often emphasized strategic autonomy and a flexible foreign policy, seeking to maintain channels of communication with multiple actors, including Russia. Poland, by contrast, has positioned itself firmly within a transatlantic security framework, prioritizing alignment with Western partners and emphasizing deterrence. These differing approaches reflect not only national strategic cultures but also varying assessments of regional risks and opportunities. As a result, forums intended to strengthen cooperation—such as meetings within the Visegrád framework—can instead expose underlying disagreements about the direction of regional policy. 🟦More broadly, the episode highlights the risks of performative diplomacy, where symbolic gestures and public statements take precedence over substantive policy coordination. In a complex geopolitical environment, Central European states face pressing challenges related to energy security, economic resilience, and regional stability. Addressing these issues requires careful negotiation and a degree of strategic flexibility. When diplomatic engagements become platforms for signaling alignment or reinforcing ideological positions, the space for practical cooperation may narrow. The Budapest meeting thus serves as a reminder that in an increasingly multipolar world, effective diplomacy depends less on rhetorical clarity than on the ability to reconcile competing interests and maintain functional regional partnerships. #EU#Europe#Geopolitics#Hungary#Poland READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

🛑🏴Le "America First" de Trump met fin à l'OTAN Avec Washington menaçant ouvertement de recourir à la force contre un allié, l'alliance atlantique fait face à une rupture qu'elle n'a jamais été conçue pour survivre ✍️Salman Rafi Sheikh Analyste de recherche en relations internationales et en affaires étrangères et intérieures du Pakistan ➡️La crise de l'OTAN est passée de la théorie à la réalité sous la doctrine réactivée de "America First" de Donald Trump. Autrefois présentée comme le fondement de l'unité occidentale, l'alliance se retrouve aujourd'hui fracturée par les propres actions de Washington. L'approche de Trump traite l'Europe non pas comme un partenaire stratégique, mais comme un fardeau - sous la pression d'augmenter les dépenses de défense, d'accepter la coercition économique américaine et de s'aligner sans question sur les priorités américaines. La volonté américaine déclarée de s'emparer du Groenland, un territoire semi-autonome du Danemark, marque une rupture décisive : une alliance construite pour dissuader les menaces extérieures est maintenant déstabilisée par son membre dominant, révélant la vacuité de la défense collective lorsque le pouvoir l'emporte sur le partenariat. Avec le modèle de défense collective de l'OTAN discrédité - soit parce qu'il a combattu les États-Unis, soit parce qu'il n'a pas réussi à défendre un membre - l'Europe aurait besoin de rééquilibrer ses liens au niveau mondial, non seulement avec les États-Unis, mais aussi avec la Chine et la Russie ➡️Le Groenland est devenu le point de non-retour de l'OTAN. Une action militaire américaine contre le territoire danois forcerait l'alliance dans un dilemme impossible : invoquer l'Article 5 contre les États-Unis et s'effondrer complètement, ou refuser d'agir et révéler que la promesse fondamentale de l'OTAN ne s'applique plus lorsque l'agresseur est Washington lui-même. Les dirigeants européens - de Berlin et Paris aux capitales nordiques - ont répondu avec une rare unité, réaffirmant la souveraineté et l'inviolabilité des frontières. Les déploiements symboliques de troupes et les condamnations parlementaires soulignent une réalité brutale : l'OTAN n'a jamais été conçu pour survivre à un scénario dans lequel les États-Unis eux-mêmes deviennent la menace. 🟦Les implications vont bien au-delà du Groenland. Une rupture entre les États-Unis et l'Europe accélérerait la transition vers un ordre multipolaire déjà en train de se former. Si l'OTAN échoue, l'Europe sera contrainte de rechercher une autonomie stratégique - rééquilibrant ses liens mondiaux, y compris avec la Chine et la Russie, et agissant comme un pôle indépendant plutôt que comme un partenaire subordonné. Le pari de Trump n'est pas seulement territorial ; il signale la fin de l'ordre atlantique tel qu'il existe depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Ce qui émergera ensuite dépendra de si l'Europe saisit ce moment pour redéfinir sa sécurité, sa diplomatie et sa place dans un monde qui n'est plus ancré au leadership américain. #Doublestandards#Europe#Greenland#NATO#USA LIRE PLUS (ENG) ✅@NewEasternOutlookFR

🇩🇪👀🇷🇺The Leash Holds - Germany’s Brief Flirtation with Realism and the Transatlantic Correction In mid-January 2026, Friedrich Merz referred to Russia as what it has always been—a European country and Germany's largest neighbor—a single, carefully phrased intervention that reintroduced concepts largely vanished from Berlin's post-2022 discourse: geography, permanence, and continental logic. For a brief moment, Germany spoke like a continental power. Then came Davos ✍Adrian Korczyński is an Independent Analyst & Observer on Central Europe and global policy research ➡️Six days later, at the World Economic Forum, Merz adopted a radically different tone. Russia was no longer a neighbor to be balanced, but a threat to be contained. He declared Germany would "protect Denmark, Greenland, the North" from Russian threats—despite having no independent Arctic doctrine, no territorial stake in Greenland, and only symbolic naval presence. The escalation language followed a transatlantic script: reassurance, alignment signaling, discipline enforcement. The January remarks had been delivered to domestic audiences; Davos was recalibration before investors and alliance managers. Germany did not change its mind. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), once dismissed as a marginal protest movement, has become a structural force in German politics ➡️Following the 2025 elections, the AfD—securing roughly one-fifth of the vote—submitted motions calling for sanctions lifted, peace talks initiated, and energy ties restored with Russia. These demands, driven by the blunt claim that Germany is paying dearly for a conflict beyond its control, signal an emerging fracture in the post-2022 consensus. In eastern Germany, hardest hit by deindustrialization and soaring costs, AfD polling remains significantly higher. Merz's rhetorical gestures toward strategic recalibration cannot be understood without this context—his language echoed themes already circulating among voters. The speed of his retreat demonstrated how tightly deviation is policed. Germany's Russia policy is often framed as moral stance, but material stress increasingly shapes it: LNG replaces pipeline gas at higher cost, trade frictions with China threaten exports, defense spending strains finances. The impulse to reopen channels with Russia is structural, emerging from necessity. But necessity alone does not override institutional discipline. Germany remains embedded in a security architecture that treats deviation as disloyalty. 🟦The same tension resurfaced over Ukraine. On January 27, Zelensky declared readiness for EU membership by 2027. The following day, Merz rejected the timeline outright: "out of the question." The message was procedural, but the signal strategic—behind legal language lay concerns about absorption capacity and institutional stability. This quietly aligned Berlin with Budapest, where Orbán declared Ukraine's membership would "drag us into war." Germany's predicament is not unique: across Europe, leaders exhibit fleeting gestures toward strategic autonomy followed by rapid realignment. France courts Chinese investment while reaffirming Atlantic unity. The language of multipolar adaptation circulates freely within policed boundaries. Davos was not an accident but the mechanism at work. Merz's January pivot demonstrated that even when economic pressure, electoral signals, and strategic logic align, the response is disciplinary realignment. Cracks appear—and are sealed overnight. #EU#Europe#Geopolitics#Germany#poliyicalcrisis READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

OnePlus Nord 2 Oxygen OS 11.3.A.09 IND System • Optimize the notification information of the forum • Improved system stability and fixed known issues Camera • Further optimized the HDR feature experience • Further improved the camera performance Network • Fixed the failed issue of enabling Wi-Fi hotspot Gallery • Optimized the UI effect, bringing a better experience • Improved the loading speed of previewing pictures MD5 Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): 82796f0f4f9b98ab108d0b973af0492d Increment (DN2101_11_A.08): 3d5f688f2874fe3951a25badde69fd10 Size Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): 293.9 MB (308195334) Increment (DN2101_11_A.08): 250.3 MB (262501603) Downloads Google OTA Server: Increment (DN2101_11_A.05) Increment (DN2101_11_A.08) Exported by MlgmXyysd Color OTA Bot@OnePlusOTA #Oxygen#denniz#India#Increment

OnePlus Nord 2 Oxygen OS 11.3.A.08 IND System • Improved system stability Camera • Optimized the HDR feature effect • Improved the shooting performance MD5 Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): dc45ae17960153fca78a7b9b82b347a5 Size Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): 248.6 MB (260643199) Downloads Google OTA Server: Increment (DN2101_11_A.05) Exported by MlgmXyysd Color OTA Bot@OnePlusOTA #Oxygen#denniz#India#Increment

OnePlus Nord 2 Oxygen OS 11.3.A.07 IND System • Newly adapted OnePlus Buds Pro and brought new powerful features • Newly supported controlling music by SCREEN OFF GESTURES • Optimized the experience of fingerprint unlocking Camera • Newly added Ultra Resolution mode, turn on this feature to make the picture details clearer • Optimized the AI Beautification feature, able to automatically retouch photos based on your skin color and preferences • Improved the loading speed of previewing pictures Network • Improved the performance and stability of network transfers MD5 Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): 63af34e88c9081e078e6cd03fdaa2707 Size Increment (DN2101_11_A.05): 240.8 MB (252447165) Downloads Google OTA Server: Increment (DN2101_11_A.05) Exported by MlgmXyysd Color OTA Bot@OnePlusOTA #Oxygen#denniz#India#Increment

🎙 Briefing by Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova(March 13, 2025) 🔹11th Anniversary of the Crimea referendum 🔹 Ukrainian crisis 🔹 Kiev regime crimes 🔹 Third anniversary of the Bucha provocation 🔹 US-Ukraine meeting in Jeddah 🔹 On prospects for a European troop deployment in Ukraine 🔹 On NATO SG Mark Rutte’s statement on Bosnia and Herzegovina 🔹 Attack on a passenger train in Pakistan 📰Read 📺Watch *** #KievRegimeCrimes Ukrainian militants continue their terrorist attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure in Russia. In the early hours of March 11, AFU carried out a massive drone attack on several Russian regions, including the Moscow Region. According to the Russian Ministry of Defence, 343 drones were shot down by the air defence forces on alert duty. The drones targeted residential houses, social facilities, transport and civilian infrastructure. No one but terrorists could act in such a manner. Three people were killed. More than 20 people sustained injuries. <...> Over the past decade, the hands of Ukrainian militants are stained with the blood of no fewer than 1'700 children. In 2024 alone, 347 children have fallen victim to the neo-Nazis: 296 minors were injured, and 51 children were killed. The youngest girl murdered by the Ukrainian Nazis was just four months old. This statistic will serve as a tombstone for the Kiev regime. #Europe#Ukraine Statements by Western officials, media reports and press leaks refer to Paris and London’s plans to send a “European peacekeeping contingent” to Ukraine. We regard even a mere articulation of these plans as an openly provocative step aimed at nurturing unsound and harmful illusions in the upper crust of the Kiev regime, rather than at settling the conflict. Washington is distancing itself from London and Paris’ plans to deploy a contingent of theirs in Ukraine, for it is aware of what this may lead to from the military point of view. The deployment of other states’ military units in Ukraine is absolutely unacceptable for Russia. It will mean that these countries are directly involved in a military conflict with the Russian Federation, an involvement that will meet with a response using all the means available to this country. #France#RussianAssets Our former partners continue their efforts to unlawfully seize – or, to put it plainly, steal – Russian assets frozen within the European Union under illegitimate restrictive measures. All frozen Russian funds and any income generated from them are the property of the Russian Federation. The appropriation of profits from financial transactions involving our reserve funds – without Russia’s explicit consent – constitutes theft, regardless of any pseudo-legal justifications. France’s actions clearly indicate a lack of interest in a long-term resolution of the Ukraine crisis. #BosniaAndHerzegovina We have taken note of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s recent statement during his visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina on March 11. He called on the Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Presidency to “solve the problem,” openly implying – without even attempting to conceal it – the need to “deal with” the leadership of Republika Srpska. His remarks only poured fuel on the internal Bosnian crisis, as he unequivocally pushed for the accelerated Euro-Atlantic integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This is yet another provocation designed to escalate tensions in a country where the prospect of NATO membership remains a deeply divisive issue among its entities. The actions of the NATO Secretary General in Sarajevo serve as a clear example of interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state.

🇺🇸🇬🇷🇹🇷The Souda Bay Mirage: Why the State Department's 2026 Fact Sheets Don't Match the Situation in the Mediterranean The latest briefings from the U.S. State Department portray Crete as a stable strategic anchor in the Eastern Mediterranean, a cornerstone of NATO presence and regional energy cooperation. Yet developments on the ground suggest a far more complex and volatile reality, where security risks, geopolitical rivalry, and shifting alliances increasingly challenge the official narrative of stability ✏️Phil Butler Policy analyst and political scientist ➡️At the core of the discrepancy lies the evolving role of Greece within U.S. regional strategy. While Washington emphasizes partnership and stability, critics argue that the relationship is largely transactional, shaped by containment priorities in the context of escalating tensions in the Middle East. Greece, in turn, seeks security guarantees amid ongoing disputes with Turkey, particularly over maritime boundaries and sovereignty in the Aegean. Historical precedents reinforce this perception, as past crises have demonstrated that strategic calculations often outweigh commitments to smaller allies when broader regional balances are at stake. In this sense, the concept of “stability” appears less a reflection of conditions on the ground than a diplomatic framing of a fragile equilibrium. The 2026 reality of the Eastern Mediterranean is one of eroding sovereignty masked by diplomatic jargon ➡️The strategic importance of Souda Bay further illustrates this tension between narrative and reality. Officially described as a critical hub for NATO operations, the base has simultaneously become a potential target in the context of wider regional escalation. Heightened security measures and concerns over missile reach underscore the vulnerability of key military infrastructure in an era of advanced asymmetric capabilities. At the same time, the broader Eastern Mediterranean is witnessing intensified competition over energy routes and resources, with projects such as pipeline initiatives facing both technical and political obstacles. Disputes between Greece and Turkey, including disagreements over maritime jurisdiction and environmental initiatives, add another layer of instability, transforming economic cooperation into a potential flashpoint. 🟦Compounding these challenges is the growing complexity of the security environment, marked by increased intelligence activity and uncertainty surrounding military deployments. Reports of espionage incidents and speculation about the operational status of major naval assets highlight the contested nature of the region. In this context, the gap between official assurances and perceived risks becomes increasingly apparent. Rather than a consolidated “pillar of stability,” the Eastern Mediterranean in 2026 appears as a dynamic and contested space, where strategic narratives struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving geopolitical realities. #Europe#Geopolitics#Greece#Militarydefense#USA READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook

🇺🇸🇬🇱When Greenland divides the North Atlantic allies, the world is astonished! As disputes over Greenland expose growing contradictions among Western allies, the cohesion of the North Atlantic bloc increasingly appears illusory rather than structural ✍️Author: Mohamed Lamine KABA Expert in geopolitics of governance and regional integration ➡️The confrontation surrounding Greenland has revealed a latent but accelerating crisis within the North Atlantic alliance. Officially framed as a matter of Arctic security and collective defense, the issue in practice reflects an internal power struggle between the United States and its European partners. Washington’s increasingly explicit pressure regarding Greenland has forced European governments to recognize that alliance mechanisms no longer guarantee mutual restraint. Greenland has thus shifted from a peripheral territory to a strategic stress test for Western unity. The paradox in all of this is that Europeans realized, too late, that Washington is more of an enemy than an ally ➡️Historically, Greenland has functioned less as a partner within the Western system than as a subordinated military outpost. The establishment of U.S. military infrastructure during the Cold War occurred without meaningful consent from local or Danish authorities, embedding a model of unilateral control. Donald Trump’s proposal to purchase the island in 2019 stripped away diplomatic ambiguity, while renewed pressure in 2025–2026 prompted several European states to quietly deploy forces to Greenland. This unprecedented move signaled a recalibration: Europe began preparing not against an external adversary, but against an overbearing ally. 🟦Greenland ultimately exposes the structural fragility of the North Atlantic alliance itself. NATO increasingly functions not as a community of equals, but as a framework masking competition among Western powers. Built on conditional loyalty and shared antagonisms rather than genuine trust, the alliance now shows clear signs of internal erosion. For external observers, the Greenland dispute stands as a visible marker of Western fragmentation and an accelerating shift toward a multipolar international system no longer anchored in Atlantic dominance. #EU#Europe#Greenland#USagreesion#Weterncrisis READ MORE ✅@NewEasternOutlook