TGTGInsighttelegram intelligenceLIVE / telegram public index
← () => "翠楼屋"

TGINSIGHT SIMILAR POSTS

查找相似内容

Source channel @lambdaexpression · Post #206 · 4月20日

前段时间一直被MajdataPlay的外键输入问题困扰:有玩家反映majplay会无征兆地出现拖判和吃音,但是内屏一切正常 因为我是第一次接触游戏开发,IO这方面也完全没经验 一开始我和bb本怀疑是线程调度的问题,即:IO线程时间片被其他线程挤占了,导致IO线程无法及时处理HID设备回报。为了验证这个猜想,我们尝试提高了IO线程的优先级,照旧 接下来我怀疑是我那套框架有问题:majplay是根据上一帧与这一帧的按键状态判断按键是不是"click"。为此我重写了这部分的实现,改进了IO线程与主线程之间的交互,问题照旧....... 到这里我已经怀疑这不是majplay的锅:IO线程没有任何异常,IO线程与主线程的交互没有问题,Note判定逻辑也没有问题,那就是设备确实没有回报给majplay或者设备发过来的回报中按键确实没有按下,但是大佬说hdd没有这种问题.....(人已经快崩溃了,这完全看不透也摸不着,因为我用单片机模拟玩家打高速纵连是完全没有问题的,我在家里用手台测试也没有问题) 到最后,bb本灵光一闪,说有没有可能是led刷新率过高,把按键控制板干爆炸了?我们让大佬把led刷新间隔从16ms改成100ms,吃音问题瞬间没有了,无语了 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 adx是一个控制板同时管理按键和led,为什么我没有遇到吃音问题呢,因为我的手台不是adx的... #dev

Hashtags

Results

找到 1 条相似帖子

搜索 #aiinfluence

当前筛选 #aiinfluence清除筛选
AI & Law

@ai_and_law · Post #147 · 2023/10/25 07:04

Proposed Chinese AI Safety Standards: A Closer Look Hey there, AI & Law community! On October 11, the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee in China released a draft document outlining precise regulations for evaluating generative AI models. Unlike the often vague AI regulations, this document provides a clear blueprint for compliance. This standards proposal sets forth rigorous criteria for assessing AI data sources and their content. The document covers topics like training data diversity, moderation, and prohibited content. It emphasizes the need for diversified training corpora and the assessment of data quality. If more than 5% of data is "illegal and negative information," the corpus is flagged for future training. The proposal also suggests that AI companies employ moderators to enhance generated content quality, aligning with national policies and third-party complaints. This implies a potential expansion of the human-driven moderation and censorship workforce in the AI era. Companies are tasked with identifying hundreds of keywords for flagging unsafe or banned content, with separate categories for political and discriminative content. They must also generate more than 2,000 prompts, ensuring fewer than 10% of responses breach the rules. Interestingly, the document encourages subtler censorship measures, such as not refusing to answer sensitive prompts but allowing AI models to respond to specific, non-sensitive inquiries. It's crucial to clarify that these standards are not laws, and non-compliance doesn't result in penalties. However, proposals like these can significantly influence future regulations or work alongside them. The standards receive input from tech experts hired by companies, giving corporations like Huawei, Alibaba, and Tencent a say in shaping these regulations. Their influence could have far-reaching implications for the global AI industry and how AI technologies are regulated worldwide. #AISafety#AIRegulations#GenerativeAI#ContentModeration#ChineseTech#AIInfluence#GlobalAI