Civil Society Urges Action on EU AI Act Implementation In response to the recent vote on the AI Act, various civil society organizations, including Foxglove, ARTICLE 19, the Mozilla Foundation, and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, have voiced their perspectives on the regulation. Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, they highlight the risks posed by the dominance of major tech corporations in the AI sector. These organizations underscore the importance of swift action to address unchecked corporate power, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence. They advocate for robust enforcement of competition rules to safeguard democracy and public interests against potential threats arising from concentrated control within the tech industry. #AIAct#CivilSociety#TechRegulation
DN42 access 本服务为那些无法轻松访问自身网络的用户以及希望体验 dn42 但又不想承担维护自有网络成本的用户提供 dn42 连接 默认情况下，地址从/96地址块中分配，如果您希望租用独立的/96前缀或更大的地址空间，请按照联系方式联系我 所有公开的PoP均已屏蔽来自中国境内的 IP 地址。如果您确实需要dn42 access，请与我联系并提供合理的理由 该服务由AS4242423377提供 - - - - - - - The service provides DN42 connectivity to members who cannot easily access their own networks, as well as to those who would like to explore DN42 without the overhead of maintaining their own network. By default, addresses are allocated from a /96 block. If you wish to lease a dedicated /96 prefix or a larger address space, please contact me using the methods provided in the contact information. All publicly accessible PoP are blocked for IPs originating from within China. DN42 access from within China is not publicly available. If you genuinely require access, please contact me and provide a valid justification. Hosted by AS4242423377. Policy 本服务需要花费时间和金钱才能运行，但为了您的利益，我们免费提供。使用本服务是一种特权，而非权利。您必须合理使用本服务，以确保其他用户也能继续享受同样的便利。任何滥用、误用或干扰服务或其他用户的行为都可能导致您的访问权限立即被暂停或终止。 滥用行为包括但不限于： - 过度使用资源 - 黑客攻击、病毒、木马等，或任何其他可能损害服务或对服务及其用户造成风险的干扰行为 - 传播可能导致民事或刑事责任的不良内容 - - - - - - - This service require real time and financial resources to operate, yet are provided free of charge for your benefit. Access to the services is a privilege, not a right. You must use the services responsibly and considerately to ensure that other users can continue to enjoy the same opportunities. Any misuse, abuse, or activities that disrupt the service or other users may result in immediate suspension or termination of access. Abuse could include, but is not limited to: - Excessive use of resources - Hacking, viruses, trojans etc or any other disruption that could harm or create risk to the services or its users - Distribution of objectional content that could create a civil or criminal liability PoP ## Toronto, Canada Prefix: fdb6:fc6a:e66c:724f:fad1:d2cf::/96 Zerotier: 4753cf475f65b0fb ## Los Angeles, USA coming soon #announcement#service
Hashtags
找到 5 条相似帖子
搜索 #techregulation
🌐📖Responsible AI Governance in 2025: From Principles to Practice The Responsible AI Governance Network (RAGN) published "The 2025 Responsible AI Governance Landscape: From Principles to Practice" in December 2025. The report maps how AI governance evolved during 2025, highlighting five major shifts: the EU AI Act moving into enforcement, the coexistence of three non-converging governance models, the rise of board-level accountability, tensions between frontier and open-source AI, and courts increasingly shaping standards through litigation. The report includes sector-specific snapshots for healthcare, HR, finance, and public procurement, and examines the operational cost of AI governance, including staffing, tooling, and audits. It also provides a 30–60–90 day implementation roadmap with a maturity self-assessment designed for organizations deploying or overseeing AI systems. The publication documents concrete governance practices observed in 2025, such as cross-functional governance teams, continuously updated documentation, CI/CD-integrated controls, independent audits for high-risk systems, and ongoing monitoring instead of one-off assessments. It also identifies common implementation failures, including checkbox compliance, fragmented tooling, accumulated documentation debt, and governance processes that exist only formally. #AIandLaw#ResponsibleAI#AIGovernance#EUAIAct#AICompliance#TechRegulation
@WorldNews · Post #73626 · 2026/03/26 18:14
Jury finds Meta and Google liable for knowingly engineering addiction in children — delivering a $6 million verdict [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#TechRegulation#SocialMediaNews#DigitalSafety
@WorldNews · Post #74382 · 2026/04/26 03:24
Manitoba to ban social media, AI chatbots for youth — a first in Canada [Read FullArticle] @WorldNews#ManitobaPolicy#TechRegulation#YouthSafety
Protecting Freedom of Expression within the AI Act Framework In a recent op-ed for Tech Policy Press, Jordi Calvet-Bademunt, Senior Research Fellow at The Future of Free Speech, delves into the AI Act’s potential impact on freedom of expression. With new requirements for assessing and mitigating systemic risks tied to high-impact AI, the Act aligns with the Digital Services Act (DSA) approach but introduces significant challenges. Providers of general-purpose AI now face complex responsibilities in balancing various fundamental rights. A misstep in judgment may lead to excessive content removal, as companies seek to avoid potential penalties—a trend that could inadvertently curb free speech, particularly for contentious viewpoints. As the European Commission prepares to enforce the Act, concerns are rising about the role of political influence in managing what constitutes "public security." Past examples, like then-Commissioner Breton’s statements advocating platform shutdowns during unrest, underline the risks associated with broad regulatory powers. The upcoming General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, set to accompany the Act, presents a vital opportunity for establishing protections that better secure freedom of expression. #AIGovernance#FreeSpeech#TechRegulation#AIAct#DigitalRights