查找相似内容

Understanding Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act DLA Piper lawyers shed light on the crucial requirements of Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) outlined in the AI Act. According to the lawyers, the AI Act mandates deployers and operators of high-risk AI systems to conduct FRIAs, aiming to mitigate potential infringements on individuals' fundamental rights. These assessments serve as a tool for organizations to evaluate the purpose, context, and methodology of deploying high-risk AI systems, ensuring compliance and safeguarding fundamental rights. Under the Act, public bodies, private operators of public services, and specified operators must conduct FRIAs before deployment, with results communicated to market surveillance authorities. FRIAs entail detailed descriptions of usage processes, timelines, affected demographics, identified risks, human oversight mechanisms, and strategies for risk mitigation. #AIAct#FundamentalRights#AIRegulation

Protecting Fundamental Rights in the Age of AI As AI technology continues to develop, the importance of understanding its impact on fundamental rights becomes ever more pressing. AI-powered tools and systems have the potential to both enhance and compromise rights, including privacy, freedom of expression, and non-discrimination. For AI professionals, gaining knowledge on how to identify and mitigate these risks is essential to advancing responsible and rights-respecting AI. To support this mission, here are some usefuld resources offering valuable insights into the intersection of AI and fundamental rights. These materials serve as foundational knowledge for anyone working in AI governance or development 👇 ✅From Global Standards to Local Safeguards: The AI Act, Biometrics, and Fundamental Rights (2024) by Federica Paolucci ✅The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template (2024) by Alessandro Mantelero ✅Assessing the (Severity of) Impacts on Fundamental Rights (2024) by Gianclaudio Malgieri and Cristiana Santos ✅Advancing the Protection of Fundamental Rights Through AI Regulation: How the EU and the Council of Europe are Shaping the Future (2024) by Francesco Paolo Levantino and Federica Paolucci ✅Algorithmic Management and a New Generation of Rights at Work Institute of Employment Rights (2024) by Joe Atkinson and Philippa Collins #FundamentalRights#AIGovernance#EthicalAI

🇪🇺Human Oversight in Automated Decision-Making: EDPS Weighs In The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) has released a new TechDispatch examining the role and limits of human oversight in automated decision-making technologies (ADMT). The report highlights both the necessity of human involvement and the risks of overestimating its effectiveness. While oversight is often seen as a safeguard against bias, misclassification, and opacity in ADM systems, the EDPS warns that inserting humans into the process does not automatically guarantee fairer or safer outcomes. The paper underscores that flawed assumptions about human involvement can lead to weak or symbolic oversight, risking harm to individuals and undermining fundamental rights such as privacy, non-discrimination, and due process. For oversight to be meaningful, it must be carefully designed, accounting for the complexities of human-machine interaction and ensuring accountability remains with system providers and deployers. The EDPS calls for structured approaches that align oversight practices with ethical standards, societal values, and democratic principles. #AIRegulation#FundamentalRights#EDPS

🇪🇺EU FRA Flags Rights Risks in High-Risk AI Deployment The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights has released a report showing that many developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems lack the knowledge or tools to mitigate impacts on fundamental rights. The assessment covers the use of such systems in asylum procedures, education, employment, law enforcement, and the administration of public benefits: areas where algorithmic decisions can directly affect access to essential services and legal protections. The FRA recommends expanding the definition of AI to better reflect fundamental-rights considerations and issuing clear guidance on how to conduct impact assessments. According to the report, these steps are necessary to ensure that high-risk AI systems are developed and deployed in ways that do not compromise individuals’ rights across critical public domains. #AIandLaw#FundamentalRights#EUAI#AIRegulation

📖AI and Fundamental Rights: New Open-Access Book on the EU AI Act The open-access book "AI and Fundamental Rights, The AI Act of the European Union and its implications for global technology regulation" is now available for download. Published by the Institute for Digital Law Trier, the volume brings together leading experts to analyze how the EU AI Act interacts with fundamental rights in the digital age. The book highlights how the European Court of Justice has evolved over the past 10–15 years from focusing primarily on internal market freedoms to playing a pivotal role in safeguarding fundamental rights. This context is critical as the EU AI Act introduces new obligations that could shape not only European but also global approaches to AI governance and human rights. #AIlaw#EUAIAct#FundamentalRights ##DigitalRights

🇪🇺📖EU AI Act: New Practical Guide on Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments The Danish Institute for Human Rights and the European Centre for Not-for-Profit Law have published a practical guide to conducting Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIAs) for high-risk AI systems. The guide aligns with international standards, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and structures the FRIA process into five phases, accompanied by a downloadable assessment template. Under the EU AI Act, certain deployers of high-risk AI systems are legally required to carry out FRIAs to identify and mitigate risks to rights protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This obligation applies in particular to public authorities using AI in sensitive areas such as education, employment, access to essential services, and law enforcement. Beyond legal compliance, the guide frames FRIAs as a governance tool: supporting responsible AI deployment, increasing transparency and stakeholder trust, and reducing litigation and reputational risks. For public sector users, FRIAs are positioned as a mechanism to democratise decision-making around AI adoption in high-impact domains. #AIAct#FundamentalRights#FRIA#AIRegulation#ResponsibleAI

🇪🇺EU Rights Bodies Warn on AI Act Amendments in Digital Omnibus Equinet and ENNHRI issued a joint statement raising concerns over proposed amendments to the AI Act within the Digital Omnibus package. The organizations state that changes are being advanced without sufficient impact assessments or public consultation, potentially affecting fundamental rights protections. They also highlight that the AI Act only entered into force on 1 August 2024, with most obligations applying from 2 August 2026, making meaningful assessment of its effects premature. The statement stresses the European Commission’s obligations under EU Treaties and Better Regulation Guidelines to ensure transparent consultation and evidence-based policymaking. It also warns that simplifying regulation based on company size rather than AI system risk could have systemic consequences, given the dominance of SMEs and Small Mid-Caps in the EU economy. Equinet and ENNHRI recommend preserving core safeguards, including AI system registration, powers of fundamental rights authorities, high-risk system timelines, strict necessity standards, AI literacy obligations, and key information requirements. They also oppose weakening GDPR definitions of personal data and proposed changes to automated decision-making rules. #AIRegulation#EUAIAct#FundamentalRights#DigitalPolicy#GDPR

Experts Examine AI Office's Key Role in EU Regulation Hello, dear subscribers! Hadrien Pouget, Associate Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and Johann Laux, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford, have written an insightful article highlighting the pivotal role of the AI Office within the EU's regulatory framework, especially in the context of implementing the AI Act. The authors propose a three-fold strategy for the AI Office: 1️⃣ Developing Harmonized Standards: They recommend that the AI Office actively contributes to enhancing the specificity of AI regulations over time. This involves aiding in the determination of normative decisions for consideration and offering insights when normative judgments need to be made. 2️⃣ Amending the AI Act: The AI Office should monitor and navigate the intricate interplay between the AI Act and other laws. Moreover, it should maintain independence while providing recommendations for delegated acts and amendments. 3️⃣ Handling Legal Matters: In court proceedings, the AI Office plays a vital role in identifying gaps in the protection of fundamental rights. It offers insights into distinguishing predictable harms from unpredictable ones by meticulously examining technological evidence. The AI Office is envisioned as a central agency instrumental in ensuring the ethical and effective implementation of AI regulations. #AIRegulation#AIStandards#AIAct#EURegulation#AIOffice#FundamentalRights

2024年全球法治指數公布 #世界正義工程（World Justice Project）發布的2024年全球法治指數顯示，香港在142個國家中排名第23，與去年相同，但評分從0.73降至0.72。 在「政府權力制約」和「基本權利」方面，香港分別下跌至第62位。特別是言論自由排名驟降至104位，顯示出法治的挑戰。 新加坡排名第16位，得分0.78，中國則排第95位，得分0.47。全球法治的挑戰仍需關注！ #全球法治指數#基本權利#法治#自由#民主 2024 Rule of Law Index Released The 2024 Rule of Law Index by the World Justice Project shows Hong Kong ranked 23rd among 142 countries, unchanged from last year, but with a score dropping from 0.73 to 0.72. In "Government Constraints" and "Fundamental Rights," Hong Kong fell to 62nd, with freedom of speech plummeting to 104th, highlighting ongoing challenges to rule of law. Singapore ranks 16th with a score of 0.78, while China is at 95th with a score of 0.47. The challenges to global rule of law require our attention! #RuleOfLawIndex#FundamentalRights#RuleOfLaw#Freedom#Democracy