Најди сличен содржај

🔫⚠️CONGRESS PUSHES FEDERAL "RED FLAG" GUN LAW — GOP STATES FIGHT BACK 🔹 Rep. Lucy McBath reintroduces Federal ERPO Act allowing family/police to petition courts for 14-day gun removal from crisis individuals 📋 🔹 Safer Communities Act blocked 119 youth gun sales since 2022, but gaps remain in non-ERPO states like Texas 📊 🔹 Texas banned red flag laws post-Santa Fe shooting where 10 died — GOP states now punish federal enforcement 🚫 🔹 22 states plus DC have ERPOs preventing suicides and mass shootings, but need federal mandate for coverage 🗺️ Schools drill for shooters while politicians debate gun rights 😡💔 #GunControl#SchoolSafety @america

Charlie Kirk 不值得同情？ 我見到好多極左supporter對Charlie Kirk 嘅死話 “live by the gun, die by the gun” 再話佢Nurture極右民粹主義，我當堂嚇一跳，然後得啖笑。 其實當你睇返YouTube佢對槍械嘅立場嘅時候，佢都多次講咗槍械係面對極權政府嘅最後一根稻草。佢都有提過香港幾年前嘅運動，講到香港人如果有槍，命運會截然不同。 其實佢嘅立場一向清晰，一個保守派基督徒。佢認為美國嘅槍擊問題唔係在於槍，而係人嘅本身。佢深信利用宗教，同埋討論，係可以解決大多數嘅問題。而正正因為咁佢會去到唔同嘅大學，同學生同埋教授討論。但係你會發現對於好多大學生甚至大學教授嚟講係極之困難。 但係極左嘅思維就係不可理喻，甚至佢被槍擊都可以被合理化。呢個究竟係一個咩思維？即係話你要贊成槍械管制，你唔贊成，我就用槍去殺你。所以你就要認同我嘅觀點，唔係我就有槍殺你。 然後極左再用佢哋嘅語言偽術，去合理化Charlie Kirk嘅死不值得同情，講到佢因為係佢激喜一個極端主義而受到應得嘅後果。但係用理性討論同埋數據去激起極端主義嘅，Charlie Kirk都可以話係計蘇格拉底之後嘅第二個。 無獨有偶，極左呢一種有我講冇你講嘅思維，正正同馬克斯主義完全相同。看圖 最後想講，政治雖然有左右之分，但係人性冇。正如用 Charlie Kirk 相信嘅聖經講：你要保守你的心勝過保守一切，因為一生的果效是由心發出。 RIP Charlie Kirk, you’ve done your job well. #CharlieKirk#馬克斯主義#guncontrol#槍械管制