🔺Continuation from above @rednile12 📌 2. Immediate Fallout: Tehran Responds Iranian officials framed Trump’s statement as foreign interference, not solidarity: 🔹Ali Larijani: Warned U.S. meddling would destabilize the region and endanger American interests and troops. 🔹Ali Shamkhani: Declared any intervening “hand” would be “cut off,” citing U.S. failures in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Gaza. Tehran continues to distinguish rhetorically between legitimate economic protest and foreign-directed escalation. 📌 3. Context Matters (Brief) The protests did not begin as a political uprising. They originated as economic strikes over currency collapse and inflation, later spreading geographically and socially before escalating. 📎 Full breakdown of protest origins, slogans, and escalation: This distinction matters—because economic anger is now being repurposed. 📌 4. The Bigger Picture: Brian Berletic on Regime-Change Continuity Geopolitical analyst Brian Berletic argues Trump’s statement exposes structural continuity in U.S. policy—not a Trump-specific anomaly. His core argument: The U.S. does not oppose Iran because it threatens the American homeland, but because Iran resists U.S.-Israeli regional dominance. 🔑Key Points from Berletic’s Analysis: 🔹Policy consistency across administrations From Bush to Obama, Trump, Biden, and back to Trump: 🔸Sanctions as economic warfare 🔸Support for opposition networks 🔸Information warfare and narrative control 🔸Threats—or use—of military force 🔹Trump’s record fits the pattern 🔸JCPOA withdrawal (2018) 🔸“Maximum pressure” sanctions 🔸Assassination of Qasem Soleimani (2020) 🔸2025 U.S.-Israeli airstrikes 🔸Now open encouragement of unrest 🔹Think-tank blueprint already exists Berletic points to the Brookings Institution’s “Which Path to Persia?” (2009), which openly discussed: 🔸Exploiting internal unrest 🔸Combining sanctions, media amplification, and proxy pressure 🔸Encouraging “velvet revolution” or Maidan-style collapse Trump’s language simply removes the ambiguity that usually surrounds this strategy. 📌 5. Why Trump’s Statement Is Hybrid Warfare Trump’s threat performs three strategic functions: 1️⃣Internationally legitimizes unrest as a “freedom struggle” 2️⃣Signals to opposition elements that external backing is available 3️⃣Provokes harsher state responses, which are then weaponized in media narratives This is not about protecting protesters—it is about creating escalation pathways. ⚠️ RedNile Conclusion Iran is facing real economic suffering—but that suffering is now being actively weaponized. Trump’s “locked & loaded” statement confirms what yesterday’s analysis warned: The objective is not reform. The objective is directional control of public anger. The struggle is no longer just inside Iran—it is over who shapes the outcome. 🔍Full Iranian Maidan analysis: https://telegra.ph/Irans-Current-Situation-Real-Grievances-External-Exploitation-and-the-Battle-Over-Public-Anger-01-01 #IranProtests#HybridWarfare#RegimeChange#Trump#Maidan#ForeignInterference#Geopolitics#RedNileAnalysis — RedNile Media | Jan 2026
前段时间一直被MajdataPlay的外键输入问题困扰：有玩家反映majplay会无征兆地出现拖判和吃音，但是内屏一切正常 因为我是第一次接触游戏开发，IO这方面也完全没经验 一开始我和bb本怀疑是线程调度的问题，即：IO线程时间片被其他线程挤占了，导致IO线程无法及时处理HID设备回报。为了验证这个猜想，我们尝试提高了IO线程的优先级，照旧 接下来我怀疑是我那套框架有问题：majplay是根据上一帧与这一帧的按键状态判断按键是不是"click"。为此我重写了这部分的实现，改进了IO线程与主线程之间的交互，问题照旧....... 到这里我已经怀疑这不是majplay的锅：IO线程没有任何异常，IO线程与主线程的交互没有问题，Note判定逻辑也没有问题，那就是设备确实没有回报给majplay或者设备发过来的回报中按键确实没有按下，但是大佬说hdd没有这种问题.....（人已经快崩溃了，这完全看不透也摸不着，因为我用单片机模拟玩家打高速纵连是完全没有问题的，我在家里用手台测试也没有问题） 到最后，bb本灵光一闪，说有没有可能是led刷新率过高，把按键控制板干爆炸了？我们让大佬把led刷新间隔从16ms改成100ms，吃音问题瞬间没有了，无语了 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 adx是一个控制板同时管理按键和led，为什么我没有遇到吃音问题呢，因为我的手台不是adx的... #dev
Hashtags
找到 2 条相似帖子
搜索 #rednileanalysis
🔺Continuation from above @rednile12 🛢️ What’s really driving prices? 🔹Oversupply dominates ▪️US output at a record ~13.8 million bpd ▪️OPEC+ (led by Russia) adding 137,000 bpd in December ▪️IEA warns of a 4+ million bpd surplus in 2026 🔹Venezuela factor is limited (for now) ▪️Venezuela exports ~800–900k bpd (mostly to China) ▪️Blockade mainly targets shadow fleet tankers ▪️Estimated 300–500k bpd at risk ▪️OPEC spare capacity can easily offset this 🔹Demand is weak ▪️Sluggish global growth ▪️China slowdown ▪️Energy transition pressures ⚠️ Strategic takeaway This isn’t about oil fundamentals—it’s about US coercive diplomacy. 🔹 Trump’s move: ▪️Injects short-term volatility ▪️Signals renewed energy weaponization ▪️Uses sanctions + naval pressure, not markets, to discipline rivals 🔹 But in an oversupplied world, geopolitics can only spike prices temporarily. 📉Bottom line: Unless the blockade expands or collides with another major disruption, oil prices remain structurally bearish, with volatility driven by headlines—not fundamentals. 🔴 Follow more insights: @rednile12 | #Red_Nile_Geopolitics #OilPolitics#TrumpDoctrine#Venezuela#EnergyWeaponization#Geopolitics#OPEC#WTI#Brent#GlobalEconomy#RedNileAnalysis