查找相似内容

#MyWriting

#MyWriting Social media has become a regular part of people’s lives. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Humans are historically hardwired to indulge in entertainment. This tendency persists to this day, and people's obsession with social media is one of them. Whether or not this is a positive development is up for discussion. Some people see social media as nothing but a setback. In other words, it is as though social media platforms are designed to doom humanity. For example, Instagram and Tik Tok, the two dominating social media apps popular with teenagers, hamper people's attention span. They do so by grabbing the user's attention thanks to their incredibly entertaining, albeit disappointingly short 'reels'. Clearly, exposure to such content is likely to compromise people's ability to do tasks that would require undivided attention, such as studying. On an individual level, this may appear to be trivial, but given that more people than ever are engaging in social media, it raises serious concerns. That said, it's not all bad news. Social media is only an updated form of TV, for example. Just as people in the past were alarmingly addicted to watching television, so are they hooked on social media for some time. The sense of novelty is likely to wear off at the end of the day, and social media will — or has perhaps already - become normal. In fact, most people have been quick to use this seemingly disturbing commodity to their advantage. One such example is teens, and possibly some adults, running a YouTube channel, such as video game enthusiasts. Not only are these people able to tap into their craft in a way that entertains them, but they are also fortunate enough to make the kind of money they otherwise couldn't. But money isn't the be-all and end-all — there is more to social media than just that. The social aspect of it, as the name suggests, is what matters. In particular, it is thanks to social media that all those introverted people finally have the chance to socialize without being overwhelmed by in-person conversations. These people could get in touch with their fellow internet users and carry out conversations on any topics they like from the comfort of their beds. Even more importantly, social media can make people's lives easier on all fronts. For those living far away from their families, it can be such a valuable tool — apps like Instagram have video-call features that connect to users in a face-to-face conversation in a matter of seconds. This would mean that social media only streamlines our lives in terms of communication and thus contending it destructive isn't justified. In conclusion, it goes without question that social media dominates everyone's life in this day and age, which begs the question: does it do more harm than good? It makes sense to assume that it is a force for destruction because, after all, it is undermining people's intellect in certain ways. However, I believe that the financial and social benefits that come with it outweigh any potential threats associated with this medium of entertainment. Written by @ieltsulugbeks in about 40 minutes.

#MyWriting The developments in the field of technology have brought many advantages over the years, one of which is a chance to work remotely. While this mode of work offers people a great deal of comfort in many regards, I believe that it is generally a negative trend thanks to the associated wellbeing risks. Working from home has certainly grown in popularity in the last few years thanks to the access it grants workers. In other words, this way of working has enabled many people to make a competitive amount of money at the comfort from their own room. This is especially true for those who are fortunate enough to be employed by companies overseas – and such companies tend to be large, which also signals to a reasonable pay. In addition to financial benefits, working from home generally increases a worker’s satisfaction with their jobs. Because they don’t need to waste their time commuting, such workers will have enough time to devote themselves to their other, possibly more important, commitments such as their social life. As a result, both their professional and personal life will see improvements. As promising as working remotely may seem, there are several risks involved. For one, spending hours on end isolated from the touch of another human may spell disasters for the person’s wellbeing. In particular, people may grow to become paranoid, making it harder for them to interact with the outside world. This could mean that they are more susceptible to depression since they do not have someone to talk about their feelings, for example. Also, working from home usually means sitting for long hours without breaks, which leads to certain health problems, such as obesity. While there might be some exceptions and even those who work onsite may be leading a sedentary lifestyle, the numbers are much staggering for remote workers. Thus, when working outside people have the chance to at least walk to their offices, which means that they will be leading a healthier way of life in some way. In conclusion, people are increasingly working from home at the moment. The main reason that prompts most workers to turn to this type of work is its perceived benefits such as improved workflow and social life. However, working at home mostly means spending time alone and engaging in disturbingly little amount of exercise, making it an unfavorable development. Written by @ieltsulugbeks in 30 minutes, Band 7

#MyWriting The advent of computer games has been a negative development, especially considering its influence on the youth. Do you agree or disagree? Computer games are generally believed to do more harm than good. Their influence is particularly pronounced in teenagers since this demographic tends to be engaged in video games more often. Personally, I believe dismissing this activity as something destructive would be unfair without considering its tangible effects on our young minds. There is a preconceived belief that computers are bad for our health, even more so if it means playing video games. Almost every parent around the world believes that playing video games leads to vision loss, when in reality nearly anything else could cause the same problem. For example, reading books, if done without any breaks, is just as detrimental to eyesight as seamlessly staring at a computer screen. However, with the former, parents of the users have a valid enough excuse to give their children the go-ahead: that reading is a useful activity that enriches the brain. Besides, there is no any hard evidence that computer games directly cause such health problems as the above; it's more a matter of following general healthcare guidelines such as resting one's eyes every thirty minutes. Moreover, without exploring the actual potential of engaging with the digital world, it is almost impossible to conclusively confirm that these seemingly disruptive computers are a threat to the youth. In other words, playing video, as unrealistic as it may seem, has been largely accruing plenty of benefits to youngsters. Take game streamers — professional gamers that play games and explain their strategies while streaming the whole process either on YouTube or Twitch, the two biggest streaming platforms. These teenagers make twice or three times the money they would make otherwise just by playing video games in public. This can hardly compare to the benefits that gaming offers on a deeper level, though. In addition to serving as a source of entertainment, playing video games effectively accommodates a person's intellectual needs. In particular, each digital game has at least one or two quests — like how to unlock a door to the next level — that challenge the player, prompting them to use different tactics and think of different scenarios to accomplish their mission, all of which is bound to nurture their intellect. It is not unlikely that taking on such thought-provoking challenges daily will stand young gamers in good stead for real-life puzzles on the horizon. While unfavorable light has always been thrown on the act of playing computer games, I believe that the trivial issues this 'vice' may cause are not justified enough to nullify its great benefits: not only does playing video games ensure robust finances for most teenagers, but it also offers the gift of intact mind in the long run. Written in 40 minutes. @ieltsulugbeks

Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extent do you agree or disagree? It is true that life expectancy has considerably increased in the past few decades, which some people took to mean that the retirement age should therefore be lengthened as well. However, I disagree with this suggestion for two main reasons. There are several reasons why longevity doesn’t translate to increased retirement age. Firstly, it is work alone that usually causes people distress, thereby damaging their health slowly but surely. In fact, burnt-out has been known to be the direct cause of serious diseases such as heart attack. This means that, in a mere attempt to avoid the same thing that shortens their lives, people are bound to disapprove of raised working time. Secondly, there are more valuable things to spend that increased lifespan on than mundane work: starting a family is one of them. Swamped with an endless amount of work, people simply delay marriage – if not completely abandon it – until it is too late. In other words, these run-down future parents can only do so much in terms of building a family, as they are already too frail to enjoy what was supposed to the ‘rosiest’ part of their lives. For example, they may not be able to have kids this late in a marriage; even if they do, they might live to see their children go off to school – something that parents normally look forward to for years. Thus, extending the age of retirement will further exacerbate this already bleak situation. In conclusion, living longer should not always mean working longer. After all, it is overworking that usually threatens people’s lives. Besides, few things deserve our valuable time except family. (274 words, 45 minutes) #MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse @ieltsulugbeks

It is argued that technology has come to dominate our lives, even in the realm of education. In fact, I agree that people will only rely on digital books and newspapers in the future because of their overall comfort. There are several reasons why e-reading will be all the more popular in the coming ages. Firstly, they are far more accessible than printed books thanks to what is known as “synchronization”. This means that one book can be accessed through multiple devices at any time– a feature inapplicable to physical books, of course. For example, when someone loses their Kindle -- a digital tablet for reading books -- they can easily continue from where they left off on different a device such as a laptop. In this way, users can enjoy their favorite reads from anywhere in the world, without having to buy a new copy and thus saving money. Moreover, online books are far more convenient to use than traditional ones. Students, in particular, do not have to bring dozens of books to school anymore, as e-books are rather compact, accommodating hundreds of books. More importantly, if it weren’t for the internet, academics would be spending hours -- if not days -- searching for bits of information in libraries. But thanks to the user-friendly and all-encompassing database of e-libraries, those seekers of knowledge can find anything they need with ease. Thus, they save their valuable time that would otherwise be consumed by printed books. In conclusion, modern humans are increasingly gravitating towards e-reading. I also believe this medium should be encouraged because of its accessibility and efficiency. (268 words, ~ 30 min) #MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse @ieltsulugbeks

#MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse It is true that affluent countries tend to offer money to the rather deprived ones to help abolish poverty. While financial aid may be a temporary fix, I believe that there are more optimal ways of ending this issue once and for all. There is a reason why developed countries rush to financially provide their worse-off neighbors: to lighten their loads. Usually, in developing countries supply and demand work far too disproportionately – there might be only one doctor per a hundred patients, for example. This means that, unless provided with enough medical workers – something only money can buy – the country’s already frail population is doomed. Clearly, no doctor in their right mind is willing to for free, especially in countries like Africa, where the living conditions are inadequate to say the least. In other words, there are simply some issues that cannot be tackled with anything but robust finances. Money is merely a temporary solution to what could be a mountain of problems. There are other – possibly more effective and sustainable – forms of aid; the most viable one is perhaps education. Poverty is a swirling vortex – once get sucked into it, it is almost impossible to get out of it. This means that if they are not taught to mitigate – or even better prevent – poverty, unfortunate countries stand no chance of fully recovering as a people. To that end, their wealthy allies should not simply give them money, but teach them how to use it, too. For example, sending experienced businessmen to tour in desperate countries can help raise financial awareness of the area, even more so when such tours are open to the public. Surely, the host country is ought to make the most of the presented opportunity rather than see it as a disgrace to their nation. In conclusion, rich countries are inclined to offer financial aid to the needy ones, and for good reason: developing countries can alleviate their existing problems thanks to it. However, in the same way a rich man does not catch a fish for the poor and instead teaches them to fish, so should affluent nations attempt to educate their deprived counterparts. (359 words) @ieltsulugbeks

In a world driven by technology, obesity has become a pressing issue, especially among children. More and more of them are gaining extra weight, which could potentially cost them dear in the future, both in terms of their health and finances. The rise in child obesity could be attributed to one factor: lifestyle. However, that is not to say this trend is irreversible. Children are notorious for their indulgence in fattening products. In fact, almost every grown-up must have eaten excessive amounts of chocolate at some point in the past, as children are wired to love treats high in sugar. Ultimately, sugar is the root cause of many health problems, including obesity. More importantly, though, people that are born after 1995 are more prone to become overweight thanks to the rise of the internet. This means that children born today lead a more sedentary lifestyle than ever since they do not have to do anything physical anymore. In other words, access to smartphones or laptops usually means that almost everything is at one’s fingertips: rather than traveling long distances to attend a class, children can simply watch a tutorial on YouTube now. This increasingly sedentary lifestyle, coupled with unhealthy eating habits, automatically translates to obesity, as calories spending is suppressed. There are several ways of helping children lose weight, but the only long-term solution is perhaps the one that involves their parents. After all, they are the ones that children spend the better part of their lives with and look up to as role models. Thus, ensuring that parents themselves lead an exemplary lifestyle, in which they engage in regular exercise, is a surefire way to end childhood obesity once and for all. In other words, when surrounded with an atmosphere dominated by physical activeness, children are bound to adopt a much healthier lifestyle and therefore avoid future health problems. Also, introducing incentives for every time the child does some sports exercises should help make this way of life highly sustainable over a long period. In conclusion, childhood obesity is on the rise in this day and age, which could be explained by how children increasingly spend their time sitting in one place and eating sugar-based foods. However, certain measures can be taken to mitigate this issue, one of which is the parents setting an example to the younger generation. (390 words, written in 40 minutes) #MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse

Urban population is growing at an unprecedented rate, as are industrial areas. These are the main factors in the loss of natural places. There are several reasons why preserving such spots should be a priority, and it is likely that this trend is reversible. A potential chance to help humanity should be a valid enough incentive to protect nature. It is a fact that natural places such as forests help sustain the environment by cleaning the air people are polluting. Trees, for example, greatly contribute to offsetting carbon emissions by producing oxygen. Thus, ensuring that there are enough trees to sustain the environment should be a global effort. After all, environmental problems are doomed to end humanity at some point in the future. Moreover, natural sights have long served humans as a source of enjoyment. In addition to feasting their eyes on the stunning views of mountains and hills, people rely on these wonders of nature to unwind after work. Spas, for example, effectively help people improve their physical health as well as their wellbeing. Their absence may lead to a potentially frail population, which in turn strains the economy. There are, however, ways to mitigate, or even prevent, this loss. As trite as it may seem, educating the governments and citizens about the consequences of this issue is the way forward. The government officials, much less the general public, have little knowledge of what could happen if natural beauty spots disappeared. One practical way of raising their awareness is perhaps with what is now dominating our lives: social media. Certain media personas such as Mr. Beast – the most subscribed YouTuber in the world – has already launched several projects to preserve the environment and brought them to his audience’s attention. The influence that such big personalities have on people is tremendous, and so if other celebrities also join this endeavor, people are bound to follow suit, at least in order emulate their role models. Eventually, preserving the environment, including natural habitats, will dominate every platform. In conclusion, the ever-increasing population as well as the growing urban centers means that natural places of beauty are under threat. The primary reason why the loss of greenery signifies is its aid to humanity on the whole, which should be a good enough motive to protect these natural sights. To that end, encouraging people to be more attuned to environmental problems through social media should be prioritized. (398 words, written in 40 minutes) #MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse

#MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse Labor force is essential to every country. It is said that a select few who earn high salaries greatly benefit their nation, whereas the opponents of this view claim that people’s salary should be capped. The government will almost invariably need exceptionally skilled labor with sound finances. In times of economic recession, for example, people who earn high salaries may come in use. In other words, when the government fails to support public sectors such as healthcare and education, such patrons may lend them the necessary funding, potentially preventing further nationwide economic doom and gloom. Capping salaries may lead to more harm than good. Granted, this practice may appear to promote equality and therefore lead to harmony in the community – but oftentimes it is too good to be true. Introducing regulations on what seems to be everyone’s lifelong ambition – decent salary – can render them utterly frustrated. Clearly, people do not spend the better part of their lives mastering a skillset at university only to wind up at dead-end jobs. Their misery may escalate so much that they will consider working abroad, which only makes things worse in their home country. That a select few make a fortune may not be welcomed by the remaining parts of the society. These rather unfortunate people claim that the amount of salaries should be controlled, but no one ever wonders why some are wealthy while others are not – it is because they worked for it. Robbing the rich minority of what ordinary people could not achieve is unjustified and — more importantly — would spell a grim future for the country's economy. (268 words) @ieltsulugbeks

#MyWriting#FromMyWritingCourse Everybody has an overwhelming desire to create, especially people engaged in art. Thus, limiting their choice of topics for a work of art may mean an apparent lack of creativity. In fact, I believe such brilliant people as artists should be allowed to splash their thoughts on their canvas as freely as necessary. It is possible that art could be misused in wrong hands. At a time when virtually everything can turn into a ‘trend’, it is frightening to think about what modern art is capable of. Take Artificial Imaging – an artificially intelligent bot that paints a picture of anything at the request of its users, even a paintings as ridiculous someone marrying a cabbage. Clearly, this type of technology poses a major threat to morality, as it is not regulated by the government. Imagine someone asking it to paint a distorted image of an important figure from the past such as Mother Teresa, and the picture goes viral. Not only would this portrayal be demeaning, but it would also change people’s perception of her, making the recent history blurry. As disturbing as allowing technology-based art complete freedom could be, the ability to convey ideas freely is important to actual artists. Since most works of art can be deciphered in endless different ways – because art is a reflection of the artists’ personal perception of the world – it is unjustified to worry about their possible impacts on people. Even if art has an influence on the status quo, it will only be trivial and wane in a short period of time. More importantly, though, confining artists to a particular set of disciplines may undermine their competence and therefore their livelihoods. In other words, telling artists what to paint completely defeats the purpose of their craft, as even the artists themselves cannot control their creativity at all times – it just comes and goes and is particularly active with a select set of themes for each artist. There are many famous artists in history who were exceptionally good at portraying their seemingly unorthodox, albeit brilliant ideas in their paintings. They would not have become who they were, if they had been deprived of clinging on to their niche. It is important to acknowledge the moral consequences of potentially unfiltered art. This, however, is easily offset by the grander meaning of art: freely creating a piece of art solely understood by its creator, no matter what it means to the world. (407 words)

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. It goes without saying that for a nation to flourish its economy needs to be robust, which may lead many authorities to believe that developments in this field should be their sole priority. However, I believe that there are other, possibly more important, aspects to consider. The natural instinct, when a nation is on the brink of a development or recession, is to question its economic soundness. After all, it is wealth that decides a country's fate in most cases. Take the UAE, a previously desolate dessert that is currently home to hundreds of thousands of high-rise buildings. If it hadn't been for its rich natural resources, it wouldn't have gone from abject 'nothingness' to what is now known as the richest nation in the world. In addition to its affluency, this nation is also renowned for its rich culture, which could be explained by the fact that it is a mainstream tourist destination. People from all backgrounds flock to this place in search of a better life, making it all the more popular. Thus, it is safe to say that the economy should, in fact, get a lot of the attention. But it would be unfair if the economy alone received all the credit for a nationwide success. There are usually other rather obscure sectors that inevitably spotlight economic developments as being responsible for any type of improvement in a country. Without a healthy population, for example, it is almost impossible for a society to exist, let alone thrive. One such example is Africa where, despite its rich resources, sickness and poverty run rampant. The economy doesn't signify at this point, as all the existing resources are squandered on treating the ever-increasing diseases. Education plays another important role in this regard. Having quality or poor education can mark the difference between a bright and a grim future for young people that will one day contribute to the national workforce. In other words, it is schools where any type of development begins. Economic strides are certainly essential — it is thanks to them that a country can compete with its counterparts in wealth and power. However, there won't be an economy to boost unless other types of progress, such as the medical and educational ones, receive the same level of attention, if not more. After all, these are the stepping stones to improved economy, which is the path to a better future. #MyWriting#RamadanChallenge @ieltsulugbeks